looks good,nice alternative to Surley, i like the drop outs and the curved seattube, a nice unique arrangement.
Also seems Manitou are all over the + sizing, what with this and the Rocky Mountain.
seems the low pressure shocks and bikepacking + sizes go together quite well.
Will have a look when they get over here.
Looks properly expensive too! £1900 for the base level version with front suss with no dropper. If it was about £4-500 cheaper I might have been interested
There’s a video here that features Trek’s guys saying they committed to 29+ rather than 27.5+ because it’s just better, even though it’s harder to design around.
That seems very cheering to me, and it’s another ringing endorsement of Surly’s idiot-savantism. I really am going to get around to a Krampus…
Looks properly expensive too! £1900 for the base level version with front suss with no dropper. If it was about £4-500 cheaper I might have been interested
I like the look of this, but the stache always seemed a great bike anyway. Why not just launch a separate model (I appreciate its only a name)? I guess they’ll phase the’normal’ Stache out now…
ootallpaul no not ridden one but having worked in advertising/marketing for over 30 years I’m very cynical about the latest greatest thing, Sea Otter is all about marketing and bringing something ‘new’ to the market. Being 5′ 10″ the 29ers I’ve tried seemed to tall so I settled on a Whyte with 27.5 wheels as the geometry/spec/price suited my needs/wants. 🙂
scotroutes I know Surly aren’t based in California but the American market is very different to the UK one and (unless somethings changed recently) the biggest market for off road bikes is America followed by the UK. The images all look like the sort of trails where riding any bike would be fun but I can’t see it’s showing why we need 29+ again just IMHO
As always I guess it’s down to individual choice, if you’re riding a bike of any description then that’s a good thing IMHO 🙂
Oh, and the prices look “brave” for a hardtail that will likely be a second bike.
True, but when you walk into a bike shop that is a trek dealer, likelihood is you’ll be clamering for a ‘cheap’ £2k rigid after seeing how much the trek FS cost these days.
I have 29+ on front of my Stooge. Bit more comfort, doesn’t get hung-up on small trail obstacles and most importantly people look and stare – ” look at your big tyre!” 😆
Who’s ridden 29+ then? Is it just sort of more roll-overy?
I have. Krampus and the new Jones 29+.
There is a lot of fettling with tyre pressures – but that may have been down to the Knards…which are pants in anything bar the dry.
Having all that undampned boing at low pressures gives amazing grip… and rebound if you pop off something.
Adding in suspension..that’ll make it interesting.
Who’s ridden 29+ then? Is it just sort of more roll-overy?
Aye, roll-overy, grippy and not as draggy as a fat bike.
As you have a HUGE contact patch you can run shallow tread tyres that roll along nicely and still get oodles of grip.
Like these:
This from the Surly Blog when the Krampus was launched explains it well:
“The Krampus is a mountain bike….. with more traction, a smoother ride, and better geometry for high speed. The benefit over a fat bike is that this bike uses normal stuff and it doesn’t HAVE to be built like anything special. The bike is nimble like a regular 29er, but confidence inspiring like a fatbike.
The Pugsley makes me want to shift down in to the granny ring and see how much shit I can run over/go through. The Krampus makes me want to up shift, hit the first chunk of shit, and try to jump the rest of the crap. Lean back, hang on, and ride that wild horse.”
Bonesetter- I can’t find where you’ve found the chainstay length of the stache, but 405mm would be crazy especially with 29+ tires. The Zealous Division ( http://zealousbikeco.com/?portfolio=division-frameset ) has very very short chainstays and they only quote at 415mm. I’m a bit confused if I’m honest….