Our carriers, are basically big helicopter carriers and can’t field mini-AWACS aircraft, so will have to make do with altitude limited Merlin choppers with a bolt on radar. We can’t launch Hawkeye type aircraft which severely limits the range that our ships can detect incoming missiles or hostile aircraft.
The F35B is very expensive, can’t carry much and isn’t a dog fighter. We should have bought off the shelf catapults, traps, Hawkeyes and Rafales/F-18Es.
They’re a typical British lash-up, an expensive one at that.
Cant really find an argument against that.
Oh and for dealing with the “rag head with an AK brigade” why waste expensive fast jet time when an A-10 or modern version of a Sky-raider, both with huge loiter time and anti ground weapon armour would be much better for the job and cheaper in the long run.
I’ve had that conversation in the pub loads of times, despite the big boys in the US military trying to kill off the A-10, it keeps on, because, like the Harrier, it fills a very necessary rôle, but it isn’t fast and shiny and good for showing-off with.
They’ve clearly never watched the crowd being wowed by a Harrier viffing, or a rolling short take-off into a fast vertical climb.
Trouble with the A-10 is they’re running out of replacement wings, and are having to ground half the fleet.