Viewing 27 posts - 1 through 27 (of 27 total)
  • Moving to a Compact crankset – Questions
  • eyerideit
    Free Member

    Morning all,

    I’m about to swap my Standard cranks for a compact set and I’m not sure it. Mainly ride in and around London/Essex so I’m not sure if it will benefit me – only time will tell.

    I’ve got a few questions for the collective.

    Have you done it and how was it for you?

    If I don’t like it can I put standard rings on a compact arms?

    Should I shorten the chain length?

    Thanks in advance

    tracknicko
    Free Member

    why do you want to swap?

    no the rings are not interchangeable due to BCD

    dont need to shorten chain, but may be neater if you do.

    strackbaz
    Free Member

    I went from a double 53/39 to a compact 50/34, as I was struggling on the local steep hills. I also changed the cassette from 12/25 to 12/27 and it’s made a massive difference.

    The downside to this is I’m quite often running 50 front to 12 rear on the descents, but I’m hitting around 40mph and probably couldn’t go much faster.

    This has suited me, although my riding is very hilly. If it was flat, I wouldn’t have changed.

    thisisnotaspoon
    Free Member

    I prefer it, the 50t seemed more usefull, expecialy with a 12-27t cassette I could do an entire day in the chilterns and only use the inner ring on 2 or 3 hills. So that’s an advantage in a flat area where you would spend a lot of time in just a few gears without the long decents to make big gears an advantage. My car doesn’t have the engine from an F1 car, so isn’t geared for 200mph, my legs aren’t as big as Caverndish’s* so I don’t need that big a gear either!

    Yes rings are available, but the smaller BCD means they wont be as stiff as normal chainrings obviously.

    Chain will be a link longer than nececary (assuming it was long enough before), I prefer leaving an extra link in the chain so that it’s long enough to re-join without a quick link in an emergency, just press out an inner/outer link and re-join.

    *well they probbaly are, but it’s mainly blubber

    ransos
    Free Member

    I have a 50/34 ultegra on my bike. I don’t like it at all – there’s a massive jump between the rings which necessitates two shifts at the back at the same time. It really should be something like a 48/36, which combined with an 11-26 cassette should still give enough at the top and bottom end. For the OP, I can’t see any reason to change from a standard.

    eyerideit
    Free Member

    The reason I’m changing is that the current cranks are bit of an antique – same as the ones below. The rings are getting to the point of being worn out so I bought some 105 with an external BB from the forum, I neglected to check if they were standard or compact :oops:. So I’ve got them now and I thought I’d givem them a go.

    I’m running at 11-23 cassette and my most comfortable gear is 53 – 17. So my thinking is with a compact I’ll ride more on the smaller cogs and have more in reserve. Until I fit it and do some rides I won’t really know.

    ianpv
    Free Member

    I ran a standard, then a compact for a few years, and have been riding a standard again for the last 12 months or so.

    Pros of the standard is the nice gap between chain rings, and the 39 is useful in a fair amount of situations. Cons are that I spend a lot of time in the 53/21 53/19 53/17 sort of area. 39/27 will get you up anything but can be a bit of a grunt. And of course it looks like a proper bike.

    Pros of the compact are that you can basically stay in the 50 all day, and a lot of the time you’ll be on a nice close ratio bit of the cassette with a better chainline if you are not generating monster power numbers. Cons are when you shift down to the 34 you feel like road runner and the bike stops unless you double or triple upshift. And they look rubbish.

    That said, I’m changing back to a compact, mainly for the 50. I’m going to swap out the 34 for a 36 or 37 to get rid of that big drop in gear. That should cover all bases for a reasonably fit rider. You’ll not be spinning out 50-11.

    eyerideit
    Free Member

    Cheers Ianpv, I was thinking the same of getting rid of the 34 for a 36.

    ourmaninthenorth
    Full Member

    What you really need is a triple. Lots of big gears, enough in the middle and plenty of tiny ones to winch you up the steepest climbs.

    What? What did I say?

    😀

    thomthumb
    Free Member

    50-36 works well for proper riding. for commuting (which is invariably slower) i find it massively annioying because i spend a lot of time hovering arround between the rings. seem to change at the front a lot.

    Haze
    Full Member

    I’ve never ridden a standard but can +1 what the above have said regarding the need to upshift 2 or 3 when dropping to the small ring.

    I spend most of the time on the 50 and went 11-23 on the back, hadn’t considered a 36 on the front…

    eyerideit
    Free Member

    ourmaninthenorth – Member
    What you really need is a triple. Lots of big gears, enough in the middle and plenty of tiny ones to winch you up the steepest climbs.

    What? What did I say?

    I’ll get a triple when I’m 60, but until then a double will do me just fine.

    MulletusMaximus
    Free Member

    I’ve gone back to a double for the above reasons of annoying gearing between 50/34. I’m now running 53/39 with 12/25 and now find the gearing a lot more user friendly.

    I don’t really utilize the higher end gears on the 53 ring but that’s better then forever changing between rings IME.

    ransos
    Free Member

    What you really need is a triple. Lots of big gears, enough in the middle and plenty of tiny ones to winch you up the steepest climbs.

    I have a triple on my audax/ winter bike. IME, it’s the only way to get close ratios and a wide range at the same time.

    fourbanger
    Free Member

    Trying to put a triple on my GF’s bike at this moment, but the Ultegra STI’s are only for a double. Sorry for the thread hijack, but anyone want to swap for some triple STI’s?

    eyerideit
    Free Member

    I’ve got 105’s triple, I’ll be happy to swap

    ourmaninthenorth
    Full Member

    I used to have a triple on my road bike but stopped using the inner ring – now use a standard and have a compact for long hilly days. Quick swap.

    Have a triple on my winter/commuter/do everything bike. Have no issue with them.

    fourbanger – might be interested. Mail me.

    Haze
    Full Member

    I’m going to swap out the 34 for a 36 or 37 to get rid of that big drop in gear.

    Don’t know what chainset you have or are thinking about, but in my case I’ve just read that Shimano don’t do a 36T ring in 110mmBCD.

    ransos
    Free Member

    Don’t know what chainset you have or are thinking about, but in my case I’ve just read that Shimano don’t do a 36T ring in 110mmBCD.

    Pretty sure TA and Stronglight do…

    eyerideit
    Free Member

    Haze – Member
    I’m going to swap out the 34 for a 36 or 37 to get rid of that big drop in gear.
    Don’t know what chainset you have or are thinking about, but in my case I’ve just read that Shimano don’t do a 36T ring in 110mmBCD.

    FSA do some

    Haze
    Full Member

    Cheers for the links, will try one out 🙂

    bristolbiker
    Free Member

    You can get a Stonglight 38T for around a tenner. My latest geared commuter is running 50/38 compact with 12-25 cassette and it’s pretty much spot-on. I spent ages experimenting with 52/38 standard and tried the usual 50/34 compact etc etc, but the bigger inner ring on the compact helps reduce the gaps and the lower BCD gives massive scope for changing both ring sizes over a (relatively, compared to standard) huge range.

    eyerideit
    Free Member

    I changed the cranks over last night andhis mornings ride in I was using 50:14 and it felt very comfortable. It’s a pretty flat ride in so there was no need to change. My work rate didn’t seem any different to riding in a 53:17.

    So I’m getting more inches and it’s easier to turn the cranks, bit of a win so far. 😀
    [img]http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7176/6985321434_e5899555e4.jpg[/img]

    bristolbiker
    Free Member

    So I’m getting more inches and with the massive tailwind it’s easier to turn the cranks

    FTFY 😉

    To go at the same speed with a higher ratio you must have been turning the cranks slower….. if that feels easier/fits your natural cadence better, then great, but you’re not getting something for nothing.

    glenh
    Free Member

    Triple FTW!

    Enables a big enough gear to go fast, without any big gaps in the ratios/between rings.
    Plus, it has the advantage on not destroying my knees on 15%+ hills.

    Kryton57
    Full Member

    eyerideit – Member
    Morning all,

    I’m about to swap my Standard cranks for a compact set and I’m not sure it. Mainly ride in and around London/Essex so I’m not sure if it will benefit me – only time will tell.

    I’ve got a few questions for the collective.

    Have you done it and how was it for you?

    I ride the same as you (I live near M25 J25) and some Herts as well I have a compact double, no issues at all.

    njee20
    Free Member

    Thing is… 50/11 is still a monster gear, it’s a serious rider who finds that inadequate.

    I think I’ll go compact on my next road bike, the winter bike is compact, the summer bike is standard. I’d always preferred the standard, but having swapped back this time I’m not sure I do anymore, always seem to be in the ‘crossover’ bit.

Viewing 27 posts - 1 through 27 (of 27 total)

The topic ‘Moving to a Compact crankset – Questions’ is closed to new replies.