His life and career are in tatters
but if he’s innocent, they shouldn’t be.
But the accuser should remain anonymous. If further evidence appears and leads to a conviction, she should retain the right to anonymity, given the alleged crime.
The sad thing for him is that shit sticks. Just like with Jim Davidson, they’ve both been found innocent or the CPS have not proceeded with the prosecution but both people will always be ‘the guys who were arrested for kiddie fiddling’
Reading some of the responses here that are pretty much along the lines of he’s been found innocent but still might be guilty, it seems that some people still think that where there’s smoke, there’s fire.