Viewing 36 posts - 41 through 76 (of 76 total)
  • Met Police new poster campaign…. #ACAB
  • P-Jay
    Free Member

    It’s a terrifying but worryingly true reflection of the Police in our capital – it doesn’t stop there though – a relation of my Wife was until recently a serving office in South East (not MET though).

    She left saying “it’s not like it used to be” now her FB feed is an endless stream of really hateful right wing posts from pages like “Britain First” and “Immigration Watch” and helpful notes how she can now “say what she thinks” no she’s left the Police – it’s hopelessly depressing.

    When I was a kid my Dad used to say that most coppers sign up because they enjoy telling people what to do – they were bullies with a mandate, but the service has changed a lot since then and I believed that most Coppers genuinely want to work for the whole community – but she’s really made me question that – she at least is no different the Coppers who used to call my Indian Mate a “P**i” like it was the most normal thing in the world, they’re just better trained in PR now.

    dknwhy
    Full Member

    So you’re saying an entire race just needs to project itself better

    Not saying that at all and I’m not tying “street talk” to any ethnicity.

    bigjim
    Full Member

    Probably better to establish the facts before getting excited though.

    which facts?

    nach
    Free Member

    My own anecdata to add: A non-religious friend born in Britain, who worked organising international activities on behalf of the British Government, with a family originally from India, was stopped and searched by Police in Brixton roughly once a week for the few years she spent there. I’m sure they did their maths beforehand though.

    edlong
    Free Member

    Take two people both going for the same job, one is black and from a notorious and rough estate in East London, the other is white and from a not so rough estate.

    If I was hiring, in this scenario, and the candidates were otherwise equal in terms of qualifications etc. I’d probably be inclined towards hiring the black person – they are likely to have gone to a shitter school and therefore if they’ve achieved to the same level as someone who went to a nicer school in the leafy suburbs then that, to me, is more of an achievement. (For reference, I’m white, middle class, and privately educated)

    andymc06
    Free Member

    .

    Junkyard
    Free Member

    Pretty sure easygirl has mentioned before about being a police officer

    I agree that he has said he is a serving officer

    The problem is two things are at work here

    1. black people commit more more street crimes so they will be stopped more often that is just policing. TBH i would imagine 90 % ish of searches are on men but we dont call the police sexist we accept that ,men commit most crimes
    I bet they stop folk under say 25 disproportionately as they also commit most crime etc.

    2. the police have a reputation for being a bit racist because they are/were a bit racist.
    serving officer making type 2 statements dont help any nor do they help persuade us thathere decisions are type one decisons ONLY.

    The duggan poster is real BS in comparison to the others [ they really hit home to be fair] and blaming the police for the riots – WTF does that say about a society that riots for a dead gangster?- is poor reasoning IMHO.

    re the 28 x claim I have no idea how the poster got to 28 x more likely but I am happy to see their working I fear none will be forthcoming as it is just BS. As to why they BS liked that I guess we will never know.

    P-Jay
    Free Member

    @Junkyard

    Got any stats to back that up?

    Also does it matter? What if more murders were committed by people with ginger hair, would that make it right and proper that the Police atop and search every Ginger person they see?

    The most prolific murderer in the UK wore a beard – should the police stop and search every bearded man to check for blood stains?

    As for Mark Duggan, I’m told he was a notorious criminal with a long history or offending – does that mean the Police are okay in executing him because they thought he had gun, or perhaps someone said he might do – did they give him opportunity to surrender? No they stopped and shot him down in the street.

    Same goes for Azelle Rodney, they drove into the car he was travelling in, shot out the tyres and shot 8 times with an assault rifle without provocation. You can watch the video on UT if you like, the Police loved it. Of course the Police decided that they’d rather not have any evidence shown in court – so they didn’t allow it.

    And Jean Charles de Menez, he actually managed to surrender and was in the process of being arrested before one of the coppers changed their mind, dragged the arresting officer off him and shot him in the head 3 times, then waited for 30 seconds and shot him another 4 times – just to be sure. He was killed for ‘looking a bit foreign’.

    duckman
    Full Member

    S’funny,but I used to get stopped cos I was a wee scrote. I didn’t realise that it was actually an exercise in stereotyping me and persecuting me based on the expectations of my behaviour by da po-po.

    As an aside; P-Jay; do you have your own theme music as you tour around sticking it to the man?

    Junkyard
    Free Member

    Got any stats to back that up?
    Which part ?
    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/crime/7856404/Police-statistics-shed-fresh-light-on-link-between-crime-and-race.html
    as an example

    I would ask you for evidence of your views as well but

    He was killed for ‘looking a bit foreign’.

    He was not but he was, IMHO unlawfully killed

    amusing you wrote like that then asked me for facts

    P-Jay
    Free Member

    @Junkyard thanks for those stats – did you have them before you made your claim or did you google them to back up or existing thoughts – again not that it matters to me – it just another justification for a bigoted view – Black people (or poor people) commit crimes, it doesn’t give them justification IMO to harass people for looking like someone else.

    As for Jean Charles de Menezes – you could spend hours reading though all the reports on, well the scant amount that the Police didn’t supress – it all boils down to officers deciding that he looked dodgy and he walked onto a train, they acted at Judge, Jury and Executioner.

    @duckman – I use “the theme from shaft” by Isaac Hayes.

    enfht
    Free Member

    The Met may be a lot of things including “useless” but they are not racist. Duggen was not innocent.

    JefWachowchow
    Free Member

    As an aside; P-Jay; do you have your own theme music as you tour around sticking it to the man?

    Who doesn’t! I usually have Starsky and Hutch or the Professionals for when I’m riding around town, granted I’m usually on my way home from the pub, while pulling sweet broady’s around every possible corner and jumping off curbs etc.
    I don’t live in London though.

    nickc
    Full Member

    Duggen was not innocent.

    do a search, the best you’ll come up with will be preceded by the word “Alleged”.

    after he was shot, the police described him as a drug dealer, (something his family deny; he worked at Stanstead airport), and un named Police sources (via the Telegraph) described him as a “well known gangster”

    Those police, they never tell fibs to back up their cases, though, they’ve never done that in the past, ever.

    MSP
    Full Member

    But he did have a gun.

    nickc
    Full Member

    Maybe.

    The original police statement said they saw an officer throw it into the grass at the side of the road, 3 of them then changed their minds and said they saw Duggan draw it from his wasitband. The cab driver says that Duggan opened the door, and started to leg it…

    The gun didn’t have Duggan’s fingerprints on it (conveniently it was wrapped in a sock), and he didn’t have gun powder residue on him.

    MSP
    Full Member

    He didn’t fire the gun that is clear, and there are serious questions that have never been answered about the police actions in that minute that ended in his death, but he was in possession of a gun.

    The police spin after the fact was deplorable, IMO it was that spin that caused the further problems. But he was not just an innocent attacked vindictively because of his colour, he appears to have been at least on the periphery of gang crime and getting in deeper.

    Using him as an example in the posters, with the wording used, again IMO, lessons the impact of the other posters, which really do highlight very serious problems.

    MSP
    Full Member

    I do believe there are big problems with the attitude of many police officers. But it isn’t a one sided equation, just in the past couple of days a police officer has been beaten to death in Liverpool, apparently because of his job (although I have yet to see any evidence for that reason) and only in the past year or so the 2 officers killed in Hattersley Manchester.

    nickc
    Full Member

    but he was in possession of a gun.

    This is public knowledge because that’s what the police told everyone.

    There’s scant evidence that Duggan was carrying it. The Cab driver didn’t see one, certainly not one tucked into the waist band of his trousers. According to the police the only witness told reporters he saw a gun. The witness denies that they ever said that. apparently he threw it 20 ft away after he’d been shot; at the trial an Army surgeon testified that that would be almost impossible to do after being shot twice in the chest

    Junkyard
    Free Member

    again not that it matters to me – it just another justification for a bigoted view

    it not my fault facts dont matter to you as you maintain your bigoted view- Everyone on here knows I am a bleeding heart tofu munching sandle wearing doo gooder. your insult could not be wider of the mark. Still its has not surprised me as your judgement is piss poor as can be seen by what you write.
    Clearly it makes sense to stop the people most likely to commit crimes
    That is male generally. That is black generally for street crime*. Whether you or I like this fact[ or what the causes are for that matter] is neither here nor there it is still a fact.
    Stating this does not make me a bigot it makes me capable of understanding data

    Black people (or poor people) commit crimes, it doesn’t give them justification IMO to harass people for looking like someone else.

    I am relived I never said the police has the right to harass anyone to say not least because its illegal to harass ;what a daft thing to say. IMHO even police hating stereotypes like you should not be harassed. However it still makes more sense to stop and search a young male than an elderly pensioner in a mobility scooter.

    it all boils down to officers deciding that he looked dodgy and he walked onto a train, they acted at Judge, Jury and Executioner.

    are you no longer saying he was shot for “looking a bit foreign”? DO you no longer wish to defend your claim?

    Those police, they never tell fibs to back up their cases, though, they’ve never done that in the past, ever.

    I am not sure we can expect that his family either knew the truth or accepted the truth or would be totally honest either.
    Who here could not and has not been a law abiding citizen with a loaded handgun being followed by the police in a gangland crime unit eh? It could happen to anyone.

    This polarised view is unhelpful. Its like we have to pick a side and ignore facts and just cling to that view.

    He was more than likely involved in crime and the police response, to put it mildly, was OTT and a killing IMHO

    * black people are also more likely to be the victims of crime as well as are males. AM i still a bigot or damn those facts again…your choice eh.
    IMHO duggen had the gun but the police committed an unlawful homicide in his arrest.

    EDIT:

    The Cab driver didn’t see one

    I might be being naive here but if i had a gun on me and i was getting a cab I might just hide it form view.

    ninfan
    Free Member

    NickC – the jury concluded unanimously that Duggan had a gun in his possession in the minicab in the minutes prior to being shot

    8 jury members thought he threw it in the grass as he jumped out of the taxi, before any police officers were on the pavement, one thought he threw it away as he was evading he police, one thought it more likely than not that it was still in his hand

    8 of the ten jurors thought it was a lawful killing, two were not sure (open conclusion) none thought it was illegal

    Junkyard
    Free Member

    What was the verdict of the jurors in the Birminghams six or the Guilford four or Maquire seven then Ninfan?

    Its frightening than no officer has ever been convicted of murder despite all the deaths in custody that have occurred as well

    nickc
    Full Member

    ninfan, absolutely. Took them nearly a month to decide.

    ninfan
    Free Member

    Sounds like they pondered carefully over the copious amounts of evidence before making a decision then doesn’t it!

    Junky – I thought the police only fitted up black people?

    For what its worth, I thought this was an interesting intervention in the ongoing debate in the US about similar issues:

    [video]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T7MAO7McNKE[/video]

    nickc
    Full Member

    Sounds like they pondered carefully over the copious amounts of evidence before making a decision then doesn’t it!

    That’s one way of looking at it.

    trambler
    Full Member

    Blimey that U.S. cop was simmering, no doubt it was all a front in conspiracy theorists eyes.

    grum
    Free Member

    That is male generally. That is black generally for street crime*. Whether you or I like this fact[ or what the causes are for that matter] is neither here nor there it is still a fact.

    Has this actually been established as a fact? More young black males being arrested/charged for street crime doesn’t necessarily prove it at all.

    MTB-Rob
    Free Member

    Police picking on a Scotsman

    Junkyard
    Free Member

    I thought the police only fitted up black people?

    They can be racist against other races as well given the opportunity

    @ Grum yes its true for the Met area

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/crime/7856787/Violent-inner-city-crime-the-figures-and-a-question-of-race.html
    it is not arrests or charged it is

    proceeded against

    which means the victim described them as that race.

    It would make more sense to discuss the causes and only a racist or a loon would suggest that black people are inherently more criminal and we should discuss economic deprivation ,social isolation, gang culture possibly even absent fathers [ not one i would support] etc as the causes.

    This fact does not mean the met are not institutionally racist, that easygirls comment was untrue or that stop and search is not abused in racist manner.
    Even if it was done perfectly fairly, its not obviously, a disproportionate number of black people would be stopped.

    nealglover
    Free Member

    d to be” now her FB feed is an endless stream of really hateful right wing posts from pages like “Britain First” and “Immigration Watch” and helpful notes how she can now “say what she thinks” no she’s left the Police – it’s hopelessly depressing.

    It’s quite reassuring that she felt she had to leave the Police because her bigoted views were not tolerated.

    alpin
    Free Member

    just finished watching Babylon….

    anyone think the series and the posters could be linked? not directly, but given somebody the nudge to do it?

    iamsporticus
    Free Member

    My prejudice of the police is tainted by unpleasant interactions over several decades with a (probable) minority and is reinforced by numerous media reports of misconduct

    It does seem to me that the actions of the few have a much greater affect on how the public view them/you than the 1000’s of other coppers doing an honest days work keeping us safe

    Despite my antagonism (well founded) the ACAB hashtag is pretty offensive

    Cheers!

    alpin
    Free Member

    #hashtag was in reference to they on the poster…. not my opinion. Sorry

    Sandwich
    Full Member

    I have a son who was in a car that was stopped and asked to drive to a vehicle inspection place late one evening after the driver blew negative on the breathalyser. While the car was being inspected the lads were abused by the assembled officers. These were 3 Middle class white lads who I have known for years from a good school. Thankfully they kept their cool and used their wits to yessir nossir the uniformed yobbos. My respect for the local force is no more.
    Like an invading army they get no more help from me which is a terrible indictment.

    Tom_W1987
    Free Member

    It’s a terrifying but worryingly true reflection of the Police in our capital – it doesn’t stop there though – a relation of my Wife was until recently a serving office in South East (not MET though).

    She left saying “it’s not like it used to be” now her FB feed is an endless stream of really hateful right wing posts from pages like “Britain First” and “Immigration Watch” and helpful notes how she can now “say what she thinks” no she’s left the Police – it’s hopelessly depressing.

    When I was a kid my Dad used to say that most coppers sign up because they enjoy telling people what to do – they were bullies with a mandate, but the service has changed a lot since then and I believed that most Coppers genuinely want to work for the whole community – but she’s really made me question that – she at least is no different the Coppers who used to call my Indian Mate a “P**i” like it was the most normal thing in the world, they’re just better trained in PR now.

    Police force needs to be run like the Army, whereby most officers are degree educated. That would sort out a lot of the chaff.

Viewing 36 posts - 41 through 76 (of 76 total)

The topic ‘Met Police new poster campaign…. #ACAB’ is closed to new replies.