Sorry 'wetgrassagain'
Running CS4 on 24" 2.93 4Gb
Sorry 'wetgrassagain'
Running CS4 on 24" 2.93 4Gb
Doesn't the iMac have DVI out anyway? I'd have thought iMac plus fancy screen would be great for usability if the standard CPU/graphics card have enough grunt for what you do.
I'm a techie, not a designer though, any screens OK for xterm
Ok, now you've got all that off your collective chests, answer me this. I have an 24" IMac 2.66GHz Intel Core 2 Duo - 4Gb thank you very much and want to change my out n'about, meeting clients, HP lappie for a Macbook Pro 17", but windows 17" laptop, £450ish, Apple Macbook Pro 17" £1800ish!!!!
aviemoron: are they really the same thing though?
I thought my 13" macbook pro was a bit of an indulgence but I tried to build a dell that was genuinely comparable and it was the same price in the end...
Whats the spec of the HP? If it's got integrated graphics etc. it's going to be more like a Macbook.. you do still pay a bit of Apple Tax though.
When I bought my Pro, like for like, it was only about £150 more than the cheapest (Acer I think), and roughly on a par with equivalent Thinkpads, which is a reasonable quality comparison. I thought the extra was worth it becuse I work with *nix a fair bit, and I wanted to play and learn about OSX. Also it allowed me to play games and do my usual home computer stuff as well as hacking a bit of perl or shell scripting without rebooting. Though I bought it as an Ebay import and it was around £1200, which helped.
This was a few years back, first of the Core2 Pros.
a £450 17" windows laptop is gonna be a turd.
surely you're not comparing the cheapest 17" laptop with a 17" macbook pro.
what i'm super impressed with is the battery (on my 15") - really is a good 6 hours doing proper work!
Got a 13" macbook pro and am very happy with it. If your simply requiring a laptop to show customers stuff on, maybe the 13 or the 15" base spec?
Love the build quality, mac os, trackpad, and battery.
All though can anyone offer advice on how to calibrate the macbook screen? the colours are abit off and I cant seem to improve them using the mac tool in systems preferences so currently use Adobe rgb profile.
mastiles_fanylion - Member
Take the point about the monitor, but as a designer the imac screen is a quantum leap forward from what I was using 10 years ago!
[old bloke]You should have been designing/artworking 20 years ago then - CS10 board, films, overlays, Omnicrom, Letraset, marker pens, Rotring pens, Agfa cameras. It would take two days to do what you can do in an hour now - and another two days to get the Cromalin colour proofs back from the repro house...[/old bloke]
In fact, I miss those days - it was a real skill that is now lost forever.
mastiles_fanylion - Member
ooh i've got some rotring pens, lovely things they are. Maybe i'll clean them up and get them functioning againAnyone remember the 'taptaptap' you would periodically hear as someone in the studio was trying to get ink into the nib of a .17 Rotring... (followed by the 'ohh f*ck' as they accidentally hit the nib on the desk and bent it.
And the agonised yelp
I've still got the scars from where I've taken the tips of my fingers off!!
If your work really is critical then do not get a Macbook Pro with the thirteen inch screen.
I was under the impression that no laptop or very few, had an 8 bit screen?
If you compare the screens of the Macbook Pro 13" and 15" side by side you can definitely see a difference. But whether this difference is critical to you is entirely subjective.
Just to be pedantic, I've spent the last 20 years of my life as a design separation artist/manager/head of design, and when reading CVs of potential design separation candidates, I used to bin the ones where said candidates couldn't spell sepAration!
Please feel free to now call me names!
I used to bin the ones where said candidates couldn't spell sepAration!
Would you also bin the ones from people who use Quark Xpress and Quark Express?
(Funny though - the last time I checked - I use InDesign now - the program didn't actually have QuarkXPress in its own dictionary)
Sorry to bring this back on topic; I use a MBP 15 (Mid 2008 one, 4GB RAM) along with a 23" ACD. It easily outpaces a colleagues Dual G5 2.5. For instance on one project we run a set of specs, MBP: 90seconds, G5:4 minutes.
Unless I found myself doing lots of HD video day-in-day-out (and lets face it, I'm a programmer most of the time, so not likely to happen soon), then I would get a Mac Pro, but the Core2Duos are more than powerful enough for almost any other media workload.
MBPs rumoured to be getting matte screen option for the 15" in September, so I'm waiting till that happens before replacing this one.
Does anyone still use Quark!
This topic has been closed to new replies.