David Lynch for me though I’ve seen all his films and prob less than half of Cronenberg’s.
Lynch has the stronger ouevre, although he’s made less films. Never put out anything bad – even his weakest stuff is pretty cool, always watchable and interesting whereas Cronenberg has dished up the occasional biscuit-arsed film. Not even that really, just he’s made a few routine efforts wheras a Lynch film always seems like an event. Get the impression that Lynch is the creative force behind the entirety of his films – is he not frequently the writer, does the screenplay, big influence on the music etc whereas Cronenberg often ‘just’ directs?
David Lynch also made Inland Empire and got it released – has Cronenberg ever baldly shown his arse in the same way? That film is amazing – actually never seen anything like it.