So I test rode a trek with kashmina front and back; I didn’t end up buying the bike as it was far too expensive for what was on offer, but that’s another story- now one of the little things that really impressed me about the suspension was if you dropped the bike onto its wheels it compressed a little and stopped: zero bounce. It felt so responsive to ride, low stiction but supportive and good on bigger hits.
Since then I’ve bought a new bike with exactly the same fork, same year, SKF seals etc but minus the kashima. 36 Talas 160 if it matters. This fork doesn’t seem to perform the same, granted I’ve not ridden it much yet and I’ve probably got a little tweaking of air pressure/rebound to do. LSC is off at the mo. There seems to be quite a bit of stiction when pushing down on the fork that I did not find with the kashima fork.
Does the kashima really make that much difference? Anyone ridden the same fork with and without?
Could it be something else, there are lots of reports of sticky talas forks on the net and if I’d not ridden the trek I’d assume that’s how they are…