Viewing 6 posts - 1 through 6 (of 6 total)
  • Is Jiving Johnny Correct After All?
  • peteimpreza
    Full Member
    Jamie
    Free Member

    I always thought there was something in it.

    Problem is, it’s a hell of a thing to prove.

    ohnohesback
    Free Member

    If only he could comment…

    kimbers
    Full Member

    just saw the interview on news24, very depressing stuff

    i also thought jivehoney might even be on to something!

    Junkyard
    Free Member

    Few would doubt the possibility of a paedophile ring at the time or possibly even now.
    What they doubted was his purple core and his triangle of control where it was deliberately used [ and covered up] as a means of control by the nefarious state/illuminatti/lizards [ ranging form the royals to the pope apparently] for world control.

    Paedophiles will exist in all areas of life, some may know each other and cover for each other. they may have had sophisticated networks that covered for each other but this is utter pish.

    ernie_lynch
    Free Member

    You would need to be incredibly naive to be surprised that pedophilia and child abuse exists among the rich and powerful, perverts and abusers are not restricted to the lower classes.

    This does not prove the point that, quote : “child abuse is central to the control structures of the political and religious elite”.

    If nothing else the police inquiry referred to in the OP link completely undermines the ridiculous claim of an international pedophile conspiracy involving the Queen, the Pope, and of course the police.

    Judges, police officers, MPs, teachers, doctors, charity workers, can all be pedophiles, it doesn’t need a conspiracy theorist to point that out.

Viewing 6 posts - 1 through 6 (of 6 total)

The topic ‘Is Jiving Johnny Correct After All?’ is closed to new replies.