Viewing 40 posts - 41 through 80 (of 85 total)
  • is chris king worth it?
  • PJ266
    Free Member

    http://tinyurl.com/y9vjoue

    It was aluminium.

    I still stand by King headsets though (and I have steel steerers 😛 So it probably wont affect me)

    PJ266
    Free Member

    Ok that link doesnt work

    http://tinyurl.com/y9vjoue

    Better.

    Dibbs
    Free Member

    That pic appears to be the only one that appears when people start moaning about the steerer damage caused by CK headsets. If this "damage" was such a serious problem you'd think the web would be groaning under the weight of pics of damaged steerers 🙄

    I bought my CK stuff a couple of years ago when the exchange rate was much better, I haven't been tempted lately 🙁

    YoungDaveriley
    Free Member

    I've had a Hope headset for 8 years.It had some freshgrease when It went onto its'second bike a year ago. I like having a Yeti that hasn't got a CK headset.

    jd-boy
    Free Member

    nickc
    Full Member

    That Hincapie bike had touring forks on it that perhaps weren't really up to being hammered on one of the hardest road races on the calender

    mrmo
    Free Member

    dibbs, i know where you are coming from, but having seen the nice deep scores on my well adjusted headset i am not convinced. They may be well made, but the design has, IMO, a major flaw. If King used the same wedge set up as everyone else and paid Dia-Compe the licence i might think again.

    Having used Campag, Dia-compe, and even bodged shimano in the past and present, nothing else i have come across has shown the same issue. For the money King wants i don't want any issues, however minor they may be.

    missingfrontallobe
    Free Member

    big-chief-96 – Member
    Is Chris King really worth spending the extra money on or is it better to go cheaper?

    Surely it depends on the frame? Cheapo Halfords Apollo, no, but a decent quality frame would surely benefit from a quality headset?

    For the record I've got a CK headset fitted to my Cove, part of the reason being I wanted a "fit & forget" headset, rather than bearings to replace, cups to pit etc. And as & when I need to get some new cranks, I'd probably consider the CK BB too.

    Daffy
    Full Member

    7 sets of King wheels, no problems with any of them and most were bought second hand. 10 min home service every 6 months – year depending upon use. I know one set of hubs is 9 years old! No new bearings, no play, just faultless singlespeeding.

    5 headsets no maintenance at all. The two non king headstes I had (Cane Creek I8 and FSA Orbit) both lasted less than a year.

    Have replaced the I8 with a CC110 as it's an integrated dohicky.

    Northwind
    Full Member

    Dibbs wrote,

    "If this "damage" was such a serious problem you'd think the web would be groaning under the weight of pics of damaged steerer"

    Maybe so, but how many photos have you seen of damage caused by an FSA headset? Even if it's not widespread, it's still a premium product with a possible performance issue. And IMO, it's just not significantly better than any of the decent FSAs, and no doubt plenty of other headsets. Not to mention that you can buy about 3 Orbit Xs for the price of one King.

    hora
    Free Member

    I've never serviced my King headset- am I supposed to? (genuine question). It feels smooth to me.

    Another thing- Ive seen a few pics of snapped carbon road forks. Even a website dedictated to them posted on here once. Why doesnt everyone boycott carbon forks?

    In part I think its user error and not ensuring your headset is properly torqued.

    PeterPoddy
    Free Member

    Yeah, yeah, yeah. Yawn.

    The King haters always bring out the pic of Hincapie's Trek. But if you Google it, the second hit gives you this:

    The accident which ended George Hincapie's 2006 Paris-Roubaix was almost certainly the result of damage from his first crash that could have been identified if he had stopped and changed to a backup bike

    From here –
    http://www.operationgadget.com/2006/04/trek_to_investigate_hincapie_c.html

    So basically, the chances are you're all talking bollox. 🙂

    hora
    Free Member

    Treat your bike, because its worth it (innit)

    Driller
    Free Member

    STW members in talking bollox like they're engineering experts shocker!

    hilldodger
    Free Member

    So basically, the chances are you're all talking bollox.

    S'what internet's for innit !!

    talking sense = boring, spouting bulwarks = fun 😉

    PeterPoddy
    Free Member

    talking sense = boring, spouting bulwarks = fun

    Oh yes indeed. Hence my smiley. 😛

    hora
    Free Member

    I bought another brand headset (hope?) once and it came in about 6 seperate bits. I subsequently lost two of the (probably) important bits so never used it.

    PeterPoddy
    Free Member

    I bought another brand headset (hope?) once and it came in about 6 seperate bits. I subsequently lost two of the (probably) important bits so never used it.

    But that's not the fault of the headset, is it?

    I can think of 7 parts in a King headset:
    2 bearing cups
    Crown race
    Thin white washer
    Top cover for top race
    Top cap
    Bolt

    😀

    hilldodger
    Free Member

    I can think of 7 parts in a King headset:

    8 if you include the smug grin 😀

    hora
    Free Member

    Thin white washer

    Wheres that?!

    PeterPoddy
    Free Member

    8 if you include the smug grin

    Natch! :mrgreen:

    Hora, thin white plastic washer fits between the upper bearing cover and your stem/spacers.

    Here –
    http://chrisking.com/files/pdfs/NoThreadSet.pdf

    Although it's not in the diagram, if you look under 'Final assembly and ajustment' it refers to a 'scuff washer'. That's it!

    tails
    Free Member

    FSA for the WIN

    cookeaa
    Full Member

    I think the problem is people think their MTB is some sort of highly tuned, precision engineered machine and that a fancy bearing holder pressed into the head tube will make “All the Difference” the fact of the matter is that given their use MTBs are closer to a piece of agricultural equipment than a bloody F1 car…

    I have yet to have a problems with any FSA headset I think the price tag of CK Headsets means people tend to Install and maintain them with a touch more care and attention than something that costs 20-25% as much, which might go some way towards explaining their supposedly bullet proof reliability, but the fact of the matter is that functionally a ~£100 CK headset does nothing a ~£25 FSA doesn’t…

    Treat an FSA like you would a CK component (install carefully, maintain properly and regularly) and it’ll probably last just as long…

    Hubs? Very loud, sure they engage faster but a Hope at half the price is hardly a crap component, it works almost as well, I’m pretty sure the Bulb on the back of My DH bike is over a decade old and has had a couple of not too gentle previous owners, there is something to be said for being able to source standard, reasonably priced spares rather than having to get your LBS to order an overpriced “Custom” bearing in…

    BB? Again I’m very impressed with my Hope at half the price of CK, very serviceable, a definite improvement on the stock Shimano HT2 efforts, I’m sure CK jobbies are as good as hope, but again given the same levels of maintenance and care (and Abuse) I can’t see how they would last significantly longer…

    All of this is simply my opinion of course, If you can see the value in CK parts and afford them then great it does nobody any harm, plus there is the shinyness factor to consider…

    But to answer the OP is it worth it? Nah I don’t reckon so…

    PeterPoddy
    Free Member

    but the fact of the matter is that functionally a ~£100 CK headset does nothing a ~£25 FSA doesn’t…

    Correct. It just lasts longer.

    But to answer the OP is it worth it? Nah I don’t reckon so…

    And I do. Because a £25 FSA lasts one year, and a King lasts me at least 6 (My oldest so far) Making the King worth £150. And for my own bikes I've never bought a new one, only used ones at about £45. So that's saved me £105 on one headset alone.

    And another thing, exactly how many used FSA headsets come up for sale, compared to Kings? Err, none, maybe?

    That alone speaks volumes! 🙂

    I should point out that I love running bikes on the cheap. I'm currently running a drivetrain (Chain, cassette, rear mech, 2 chainrings and rear hub) that cost me the princely sum of £45, made up from mostly lightly used components I got silly cheap. Why? Because it will last just as long as if I'd bought it all new for £250. That's VFM to me. And a headset that saves me £105? That's VFM too. Making it 'worth it'.

    It's very difficult to argue with maths like that you know….. 😉

    hilldodger
    Free Member

    Do people really trash 'non-King' headsets in a year 😯

    I've used all kinds of 'cheap' h/s and all have lasted at least a couple of years, then got a good price on an 'old style' Hope and that's lasted 3 bikes/5 years and still no sign of problems.

    As cookeaa says, just buy it if you like it/can afford it, no need to try and justify it as 'value for money'

    cookeaa
    Full Member

    Like I said Buy an FSA and treat it like it was a CK you'd spunked ~£100 on and it'll last far longer, The reason you don't see 2nd hand FSA's very often is that it's pointless trying to sell something that cost relativly little to buy new, leave it in the frame when you flog it…

    As I said buy it if you can afford it and see the VFM… Each to their own, I just reckon there are better VFM Equivalent components about.

    rob1984p
    Free Member

    By repute the CK tandem special hub is the strongest hub out there. a very rare and expensive beast but apart from a rohloff the only hub not to fail under mtb tandeming

    I can't comment on the CK tandem hub but comparing it to the Rohloff of which the only truly questionable aspect is flange failure albeit rare isn't hardly sounds like praise. I do not believe remember ever seeing a failed Shimano tandem hub although edco tandem hubs were renowned for problems.

    I have used CK ISO and ISO 20mm hubs in 823's when the 823 was fresh out and thought the hubs were pants, the rear refused to stay tight (yes I had the exorbitantly priced tool the price of which was justified by saying "it's anodised aluminium" I didn't fuel the fire and ask if they had an anodised steel one) the front hub was ok but also seemed to need frequent adjustment.

    As for the headsets, overhyped nonsense, I had one that was significantly undersized when compared to FSA and Hope offering so creaked, I also had one on a hardtail that wore a worrying groove in my alloy steerer.

    I would have Hope hubs and accept that every now and again the cartridge bearings need replacing or have high end Shimano ones not current XT for the adjustableness. As for headsets FSA seem great and cheap, I had one of the first hope ones a few years ago and was very impressed at the abuse and mistreatment it took.

    As regards BB I have no experience but if I was some sort of bearing whore I would look at BETD reconditioned Shimano cups.

    PeterPoddy
    Free Member

    Do people really trash 'non-King' headsets in a year

    Oh yeah. Last FSA I had did well, 14-16 months IIRC. The OE one on my Pitch lasted about 15 rides. I've fitted a cheapie I was given, but that's getting stiff already.

    It's wierd. Some things I smash up pretty quickly (Headsets, SQ taper BBs, back wheels mainly) Other stuff people have terrible problems with last me forever (EG – Chains, forks, tyres) and I do look after my kit very well too, as anyone I've sold to will tell you. Odd really. If a £25 headset lasted me 3 years, I'd still be using them…..

    hora
    Free Member

    rob1984p you do know that for a while after new you have to retighten them dont you?

    adstick
    Free Member

    Cane Creek S3 lasts years, costs £30 and is a 'better' design. I fit them to a wide variety of well maintained and badly maintained bikes and I've not seen one properly fail. If you do knacker the bearings they cost £15.

    So, no King not worth it in my opinion. Regardless of the o-ring issue…

    rob1984p
    Free Member

    hora – Member

    rob1984p you do know that for a while after new you have to retighten them dont you?

    Hora, thanks I did know that but they were far more attention seeking and problematic than any other hub I have ever experienced (bar the current XT on my XC bike which had every single one of the problem people have experienced with them)either as a user or mechanic.

    Adstick, I think the Cane Creek S3 is the same as the Orbit XLII we were sent some oe ones that were a mix of both Cane Creek and FSA branded bits, I would agree that they are a great option and I have / have had them in several bikes. IIRC the FSA uses needle bearings which spread the load far better.

    tails
    Free Member

    Everyone knows king owners don't ride there bikes.

    owenfackrell
    Free Member

    I don't have CK but can't belive the stories of people have xx for y years with out touching them becuase if this was the case then CK would be making a fortune in the engineering world with such long lasting equipment. My Mavic wheel bearings have just been changed after 3 years and a lot of use. My headset is 2 years old and was a chep one but then i use a mudguard to protect it from the worst of the crap and that is still fine.

    Edit: IMHO

    PJ266
    Free Member

    Everyone knows king owners don't ride there bikes

    You mean like George Hincapie? 😉

    hora
    Free Member

    owenfackrell – My King kit is the stuff that works spot on but looks worn. you know the stuff where you wouldnt get much if you tried selling it but you know it works perfectly and is worth more than what it'd fetch.

    owenfackrell
    Free Member

    hora – Member
    owenfackrell – My King kit is the stuff that works spot on but looks worn. you know the stuff where you wouldnt get much if you tried selling it but you know it works perfectly and is worth more than what it'd fetch.

    I have an awful lot of that sort of stuff 😀

    freeform5spot
    Free Member

    there are issues with rear hub freeze below about -6 degrees or so.

    apart from that I have had no issues with any of the CK that I have had and love them!

    mrmo
    Free Member

    You mean like George Hincapie?

    that is why it failed, it got used. 😉

    handyman
    Free Member

    i have headset it is 8 years old, it was secondhand when i bought it, it has done 4 frames one of the frames wore out after six years the rear pivots ovalised it was a turner which i did maintain and changed bushings as neccessary, the headset is as good as new i regrease once a year, i have used it for racing long and short distance winter summer etc i paid £45 ish for it so it has cost me just over a fiver a year and it will last another 8 years i reckon

    the_lecht_rocks
    Full Member

    headsets and hubs on all my bikes.
    regularly cleaned and regreased / lubricate ring-drive and they're FLAWLESS.
    one of the hubs is 9 years old, and although the black anodising is looking a little violet, they're tigjht and smooth and the flange facings haven't cracked like my previous hope hubs in the 90's.
    king is like an expensive watch. if you can afford it, you'll buy it and you better look after it 😀

Viewing 40 posts - 41 through 80 (of 85 total)

The topic ‘is chris king worth it?’ is closed to new replies.