Viewing 37 posts - 1 through 37 (of 37 total)
  • Is being Tall an advantage for MTB??
  • maxtorque
    Full Member

    So, as someone best described as “a lanky streak of …..” i wonder if being longer of leg carries significant advantage when riding a bike off road?

    I mean, more leg means more suspension right?

    When you look at most of the World Cup DHers, the ones constantly on the podium over the years seem quite tall (Peaty, Minnar, Gwin etc) but clearly, the smaller guys and girls can do aright too (Hart, Bruni etc).

    I also quite clearly remember being told by our very own Jedi that “once we sort out what you’re doing with your legs, you’ll be pretty decent on a bike” which i think was a compliment of sorts 😆

    So, how tall are you, and does that match your Rad Skills in t’gnar ??

    funkmasterp
    Full Member

    5ft 9″ with zero rad skillz! I simply point the bike down and hang on. 29+ wheels are my friends 🙂

    prawny
    Full Member

    It’s an advantage during the sales and when you want to fit a decent length dropper.

    Average height with slightly short legs so royally f’d here.

    RustyNissanPrairie
    Full Member

    I’m 6’6″ and rad to the maxx

    gavinpearce
    Free Member

    6’6″ and fairy rubbish!

    RustySpanner
    Full Member

    Everything in proportion innit?
    Taller people move more to maintain relative position.

    And as a dwaff, I don’t have to duck whilst going under canal bridges and can still get bargains in the sales.
    🙂

    fifeandy
    Free Member

    Height generally brings weight.
    Weight brings momentum.
    Momentum is key on the downhills.
    So yes, i’d generally consider height to be an advantage for gravity based MTB.

    singlespeedstu
    Full Member

    My Garmin showed more ascent than my mates Garmin today and he’s on a medium frame and i’m on a large so it must be true.
    I also manged to climb over fences much easier than he could so it must be double true.

    welshfarmer
    Full Member

    At the OMM bike just finished 3 of the top 4 riders were well over 6 foot with 2 of them over 6,6.

    dyls
    Full Member

    Nino is 1.73cm or 5′ 8″

    Bez
    Full Member

    6’5″ here. I don’t claim to be any good (especially these days) but I do think the long limbs help as far as suspension is concerned (in certain scenarios more than others) which is partly why I’ve always preferred rigid bikes.

    RustySpanner
    Full Member

    fifeandy – Member
    Height generally brings weight.

    Pies generally bring weight too.

    #genuinelyscottish?

    Lester
    Free Member

    max, how tall is Jedi 🙂 think you might have answered your own question 🙂

    plumslikerocks
    Free Member

    Tall chaps tend tha have the advantage of “longer levers” which helps to get those pedals turned round. A fit 6ft3er still weighs more than a fit 5ft9er so I’sd expect endurance to take a bit more work.

    fifeandy
    Free Member

    @Rusty: Pies do indeed bring weight, but a tall pie eater will still likely have more momentum than a short one.

    corroded
    Free Member

    Tall chaps tend tha have the advantage of “longer levers”

    This. Good for climbing. No idea if it affects descents.

    chilled76
    Free Member

    The 3 fastest dh riders I’ve known personally and ridden with over the years have all been 6ft3 to 6ft5.

    Taller folk ride bigger bikes which are always longer.

    Longer bikes makes for more stability and easier navigation of big terrain.

    I personally believe it is an advantage however slight

    I’m 5ft10

    damascus
    Free Member

    Are we talking mtb dh or mtb xc?

    I’m 9 inches taller than my best mate but probably 2 or 3 stone heavier. We are both an athletic build although he’s probably stockier than me. (6ft3 and under 13 stone)

    This mean on the climbs with his xs bike, xs clothes, xs shoes and at least a 2 stone advantage he is usually quicker uphill. He also has more skill than me so he is quicker on the technical dh. On Singletrack dh I can hold my own.

    Where I find I get an advantage is on the flat or slight up hills or pedally downhills. This is where he finds his lack of weight a disadvantage.

    I’d guess over a short race weight doesn’t matter as much but over a longer distance it adds up.

    Chris froome is the best of both worlds. 6ft1 and 10.3 (ish) stone when he won the tdf

    If we are just talking dh then every little bit of weight counts but it’s also about how big your balls are too and your skill level.

    cynic-al
    Free Member

    . Good for climbing. No idea if it affects descents

    Xc riders are rarely tall because it’s about power to weight as well.

    Kuco
    Full Member

    XC doesn’t seem to hold them back especially the women. Just look at the Olympic XC, other than Jaroslav, Nino and Carlos aren’t particularly tall.
    Men
    Nino Shurter 5’8″ Gold
    Jaroslav Kuhavy 6’2″ Silver
    Carlos Coloma Nicolas 5’8″ Bronze

    Women

    Jenny Rissveds 5’5″ Gold
    Maja Wloszczowska 5’7″ Silver
    Catharine Pendrel 5’5″ Bronze
    And Emily Batty is only 5’3″

    Dilwyn
    Free Member

    Troy Brosnan seems to do ok.

    nickc
    Full Member

    When you look at most of the World Cup DHers, the ones constantly on the podium over the years seem quite tall (Peaty, Minnar, Gwin etc) but clearly, the smaller guys and girls can do aright too (Hart, Bruni etc).

    I think you may have answered your own question. 😆

    chakaping
    Free Member

    Longer bikes makes for more stability and easier navigation of big terrain.

    The stability is surely relative to the rider’s body weight distribution, but you may be onto something with a long bike getting over lumps better.

    In answer to the OP, which was DH-focused…

    Sam Hill = 5ft 7in
    Aaron Gwin = 5ft 8in
    Troy Brosnan = 5ft 5in

    So I’m gonna go with “no”. The received wisdom about “big guys tracks” went out the window when Troy won at Fort William anyway.

    theprancinghorse
    Free Member

    I’m tall, and i always found it to be a disadvantage, you centre of gravity is higher so i think it makes you less stable. Or maybe i’m just crap off road, either way i have fun!

    FOG
    Full Member

    We have a riding mate who has actually given up mtbing because he is too tall! (6′ 5″) Actually he is just crap. Unfortunately he believes he is great on a road bike. Actually he is just as crap but is very fit which tends to compensate.

    dragon
    Free Member

    More about power than height.

    Northwind
    Full Member

    One thing that always used to strike me, was that tall people on older bikes looked like a ship’s mast, all topheavy and too tall for the amount of long. So many bikes added tiny amounts of length for each height increase so you’d see some where the reach, wheelbase etc were reasonable for me on a medium but the XL went mostly up.

    (I’m normal sized, but my mate ChrisL of this parish is not, and I think last year when he got his Mega 290 is the first time he’s ever had a bike that fits. And it’s not just us knobbers, Ben Cathro on Santa Cruz ended up with reach headsets etc in his bike to try and get it to work)

    Logically more arm and leg is an advantage and a disadvantage so it becomes about working with and around those. Modern longer drop dropper posts probably help more too.

    Rorschach
    Free Member

    Being co-ordinated and fit is an advantage.

    maxtorque
    Full Member

    Rorschach
    Being co-ordinated

    Ok, now i know where i’m going wrong…… 😆

    PaulGillespie
    Free Member

    Taller riders have a higher centre of gravity which is not great for cornering…that’s EXACTLY why I crash lots on corners and my shorter friends don’t! Science innit

    P-Jay
    Free Member

    I’m decidedly average both in height (5′ 10″) and mad skillz.

    I think like a lot of things it has it’s pluses and minuses – I did wonder once when you look at the likes of Peaty, Minnar and Warner (we was good once) whether being lofty helped with DH somehow, but if anything If you listen to them it’s been a hinderance – Warner reckons the first bike he’s owned that fitted him was an XXL Gaint XC bike about 2/3 years ago, Minnar is saying the 29er V10 is finally big enough for him etc.

    gravesendgrunt
    Free Member

    We all have different body geometries and whatever size we are a bike that fits us and makes things easier and not a battle is a bike that is naturally faster and more fun as things just click into place. I’m sure that one of the very longest of DH bikes with 29 inch wheels and long chainstays would indeed be one of the quickest and most stable bikes there is but only with the guy or girl tall enough that it fits properly and they can harness it’s potential.
    So…..with these big 29er DH monster trucks now appearing ‘perhaps’ we could indeed see an era where the bigger peeps begin to dominate if they don’t already.

    I’m 5’7″ with relatively long legs/short torso and reach so I’d probably have more chance getting pushed down a start ramp in a shopping trolley than on top of Minnars new V10 😀 but…..he may not fit in the trolley as good.

    Ming the Merciless
    Free Member

    Yep, because God hates short people and at 5’5 my luck is a syphillitic tumour.

    chiefgrooveguru
    Full Member

    Absolutely – for putting bikes on roofracks.

    andyrm
    Free Member

    And then of course you have Nico Vouilloz….. Size of a small child but still terrifyingly fast at 40+, so obviously didn’t get the “tall = fast” memo!

    markgraylish
    Free Member

    I’m 6’4″ and scared of heights so any short arse has an immediate advantage over me when riding skinnies. Or anything with a steep roll in or dodgy transition at the bottom…
    Or any riding in a cross wind… 🙂
    I’m also cursed with relatively short legs for my height (33″) so don’t a great standing over advantage either.

    shermer75
    Free Member

Viewing 37 posts - 1 through 37 (of 37 total)

The topic ‘Is being Tall an advantage for MTB??’ is closed to new replies.