My CPU fan is whizzing its little nuts off here. I know it's old ground but for heavens sake:
STW in Chrome, with ads on:
80% CPU to run the flash ads, 6% to run the browser
STW in Chrome, with ads off:
0% CPU to run the flash ads, 3% to run the browser
STW in Firefox, with ads on:
66% to run the browser (incl Flash)
STW in Firefox, with ads off (and I can scroll again without the Cotic banner):
0% to run the browser
This is not funny and nor am I trying to sh1tstir about adblocking, but its a real drag on other apps and it's making my computer work far harder than it needs to, makes the browsing experience crap and not to mention that Cotic banner borks my scrolling when I browse in Firefox with the ad in place. With all that, what do you think the solution Im forced to use is? Do STW towers not care about this at all?
I know the ads are a source of revenue, but it's getting beyond a joke when they are hogging so much of the system resources. Fine line – satisfy your advertisers and alienate your customers?
Without wanting to sound too much like a Charlie Brooker hate character, it seems to run fine on a mac under both Firefox and Safari. Maybe STW towers is all OS X?
That cotic backdrop is a bit richard whiteley tie though.
Currently on a MacBook 2.4 ghz with 4 gb of ram, but I usually use a Samsung NC10 with 2 gig and its fine on that – I'm not on Snow Leopard yet though.
nope, no issues here. Vista and running firefox. CPU runs at max 30% to drive firefox, but bounces between 10-30%. Core2duo/2.2GHz, 2Gb RAM… nothing super special.
I really want to run chrome as my default browser but because it doesn't have an effective adblocker yet and I have STW open all the time I cant use it – I have to stick with FF.
Its a pretty poor show when your choice of browser is mainly driven by the behaviour of one website.
Not on this PC, but on both my others – one which is a quad core and one which is a PIII. The PIII is ground to a halt with it. I assume it depends on software versions?
There's a number of sites that at times are almost impossible to navigate without some assistance – this one and the Telegraph are the most significant IMO.
I personally have taken to mainly watching the main forum RSS feed instead of browsing the normal topic list page since the Cotic background appeared. 🙁
Is there any chance that SingleTrack could perhaps have a higher priced mag subscription which allowed the purchaser to tick a box in their userprefs and remove the ads?
Absolutely kills my old laptop. All the fans come on max and the whole thing runs like a dog.
completely unusable with the ads on.
Fine on my main desktop PC and work PC (even when I allow the ads and don't re-jig the layout)
Though it does seem to randomly crash firefox on both PCs. 🙄
Yeah that was discussed earlier in the Cotic thread. No real idea why something staying still would make the scrolling jerky. Fine on my PCs but a few people have reported it and TomDB was investigating.
Background image shouldn't add any drain to the CPU once loaded.
Flash? Well Adobe have made lots of really bad performing plug-ins for all sorts of browsers. If you've got one of their bad ones then a couple of flash ads can work your machine real hard. Recent versions of Firefox paired with older versions of flash can be a real pain.
Nah it's bad on my laptop even with latest firefox and latest version of flash.
No idea why the static cotic background is causing some folk issues, but it apparently is. I did suggest that having a fixed background overlayed over a scrolling one might be the issue, but not so according to Tom so all very odd.