Done by real doctors carrying out real research.
Apologies if this sounds insulting, but from that statement I’m jumping to the conclusion that you aren’t a scientist. Statements and ludicrous assertions do not become true, scientific “facts” just by putting a name after them in brackets (edlong, 2014).
Have you actually checked out any of the “evidence” cited in support of some very stark assertions? Maybe have a peruse of the references in the footnotes of the article. Oh no, sorry, there doesn’t actually appear to be a proper list of citations at the end. Good luck googling from the random references in the brackets then.
I tried to find, for example “Rowan, 2010” as it apparently provides the evidence that backs up the statement that “Use of technology under the age of 12 years, is detrimental to child development and learning” but I got some stuff about a bishop and some bloke at the University of Bath who did Cassava: an appraisal of its phytochemistry and its biotechnological prospects.
This is bullshit (very badly) dressed up as science with a few stylistic cues that look vaguely like science if your last exposure to it was O Level Chemistry. Please apply some critical thought before promoting this crap as anything other than a sales and marketing tool that plays to the fears of parents in order to sell garbage.
Did it make me think? Yes, it made me think that there are some pretty cynical people out there who will try and make a quick buck by playing on fear and ignorance, and that there are plenty of idiots out there who buy this shit.