It is shameful. And it’s a very interesting thread, Emma. Not least because it’s introduced me (and possibly others) to the strange world of Furbies.
As for design; I’m just lowly small-fry compared some of the big design companies out there, but I love what I do, and have belief and pride in my own abilities. If that abomination really is the best a well-repected company like Wolff-Olins can come up with, then I despair, I really do.
It’s seriously bad, and an abject failure. Even Winegums can’t come up with owt to justify or defend it.
An example of good branding is Apple Computer. The iMac product range was the beginning of one of the most successful branding campaigns in recent times. An Apple product is instantly recognisable, distinct from it’s competition, and there is a perception of quality and reliability about Apple stuff. The brand and logo has even become fashionable.
The London 2012 logo is the antithesis of good brand design. Supposedly designed to appeal to ‘young people’, it fails spectacularly on every level. A mate of mine was working with a youth project in east London, and some of the Lympic promotion bods came down to do some photo propaganda type stuff. The bought loads of t-shirts to give to the kids, to wear in the photos/
All the kids refused to wear them, because they were ‘well butters’ (crap). Says it all, really. 🙄