It’s all just maths, folks – put in which ever assumptions take your fancy and see how it comes out 😛
I’m not trying to prove anything – just curious to see how the numbers looked, but bear in mind –
Full body weight on a crank in 24:36 means mashing up a 1 in 1 (i.e 100% gradient) hill on a 26″ wheel, and even then, you’d only see that torque stalled with the pedal at the 3 O’Clock position – if you’re still moving forwards, the torque will be lower.
In more realistic gears (say 32:28) the torque on the cassette is much less – it would need a 140kg / 22 stone rider out of the saddle up a 1 in 2 (i.e 50% gradient) hill to reach the ~230 Nm at the cassette;
Wear comes about from things that happen repeatedly. If a sprocket slipping is marginal in a one off, worst case scenario, then it’s unlikely to happen repeatedly in “normal” riding and hence unlikely to be the cause of wear.
FWIW, I use a torque wrench, because I don’t trust myself. I tend to be a bit ‘agricultural’. My baseline is the rear hubs on bay window VW busses – 340Nm (bent a 3/4″ drive tommy bar!).
Working out the rough figures above has convinced me that I should make sure to give it enough beans when tightening the locking ring – YMMV 🙂