Viewing 40 posts - 1 through 40 (of 90 total)
  • how many more have to die at the hands of the NHS?
  • totalshell
    Full Member

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-devon-28029149

    another life passes when it would have probably been easier to save and yet , again all we have is ”the NHS will learn, we must change this and that we ‘re very sorry, steps have been taken”

    no they havent when will i see a doctor nurse health care proffesional in the dock.. sometime no time never. if as a plumber i make an error fitting a boiler that doesnt but may injure someone i expect to be in court and yet NHS staff seem immune incompetance laziness simple couldnt care less seem everyday in cases like this young lads..

    why does nobody EVER get punished if they did it would soon stop ..

    thisisnotaspoon
    Free Member

    Because if you put every Dr in the big house for 25 years each time they made a mistake that decreased someones chances of survival rather than increasing it, they’d either all be in jail, or become accountants, and we’d all end up dead (but with very accurate tax returns).

    And it’s not like plumbing in a boiler, there’s not an instruction book with the patient telling them how to fix them.

    project
    Free Member

    why does nobody EVER get punished if they did it would soon stop

    Because nobody complains loud enough and long enough, its almost seen as negative to complain about poor service in the NHS, yet when you get some dodgy fruit in Lidl, a thread starts, or the local bike shop, car garage, dealership, workmate or manager screws up we get threads.
    Lets also remember those that investigate complaints in
    the NHS are usually the senior managers responsible for their failings to train and supervise their staff, think stafford hospital, shipman, stoke manderville, jimmy savile (pervert), etc, etc.

    dbcooper
    Free Member

    Well initially I call troll, but I can’t seem to help myself from responding.

    I agree with thisisnotaspoon.
    I think the idea that the NHS needs to be mistake proof is costing the NHS and all of us dearly. It is a very, very hard job, there are umpteen unpredictable factors, and the hand wavers in this country appear to be killing the NHS.
    Before long we will have a system that delivers similar (OR NOT AS GOOD) levels of service as the NHS, but we will each have to pay individually for our services.

    So my message to you OP is, shut up, or get involved with developing systems that could help improve things, insead of handing out outrage and blame.

    In fact the familiy concerned have said in your own link “We didn’t want it to be about blame, we wanted it to result in good learning.”

    If we start punishing Dr’s and Nurses for mistakes or institutional errors, people will leave the NHS and we will be left with a worse srvice.

    Given that the NHS has been rated as the best in the world I feel very lucky to be a recipient of its services, and think we should be working to improve it rather than moan about it.

    project
    Free Member

    Thisisnotaspoon, lots of jobs dont have a text book answer, but with experience, and training things get done,advice is sought and very occasiionaly something may go wrong, thats when the H and S, police, regulatory bodies and customers step in and ask questions and sometimes prosecute, sometimers resulting in prison sentances or bankruptcy, nhs staff just move somewhere else.

    ex nhs employee.

    pondo
    Full Member

    From that article you posted –
    ” – 37,000 people are estimated to die of sepsis each year in the UK
    – From the time sepsis first takes hold, healthcare workers have just hours to deliver the right care”

    ernie_lynch
    Free Member

    if as a plumber i make an error fitting a boiler that doesnt but may injure someone i expect to be in court

    In my years working in construction I have known plumbers to make a multitude of mistakes, I can’t recall any of them ending up in court.

    Are you allowed to make “small” mistakes ?

    What small mistakes are health care workers allowed to make ?

    tonyd
    Full Member

    I know a few doctors, they all work incredibly hard and long hours. As far as I can see there are no hard and fast rules in anything much, least of all medicine. Unless someone is willfully negligent or worse how you can you demand they get prosecuted?

    I refer you to a very good post from an earlier thread – move to America, you’ll fit right in.

    fasthaggis
    Full Member

    Given that the NHS has been rated as the best in the world I feel very lucky to be a recipient of its services, and think we should be working to improve it rather than moan about it.

    This^^ Not that bad practise and accidents should be ignored, but people tend to lock on to the horror stories, like the one that the OP posted ,or people left in corridors and forgotten about, or an ambulance response time that then changes an outcome. Mistakes are made and shit does happen ,yet incredible work is going on every day that will never get a mention.

    totalshell
    Full Member

    certainly not a troll i write as a regular user of the nhs, i ve seen the good brilliant and the cack and ugly and frankly i ve been in a cardiac are unit on an night preying that i dont have an issue as the nurse/doctor in charge have already proven thier incompetance to me..

    i m staggered that none of these killers are held accountable, not even taken for retraining, suspended never mind criminal proceedings, phone hackings worth tying up the courts for 9 months but levels of incompetance that lead to a healthy lads death are not?

    pondo
    Full Member

    i ve been in a cardiac are unit on an night preying that i dont have an issue as the nurse/doctor in charge have already proven thier incompetance to me..

    I’m sure you’re well-qualified to make that judgement, too.

    notlocal
    Free Member

    I’m a Paramedic, and there is always that nagging doubt with certain patients of “what if”. Thankfully there are more good news outcomes than bad in emergency medicine. They don’t sell as many newspapers though.
    All too often the press report on RTC victims being taken to hospital. They never mention the previous hour taken to maintain a life and extricate the casualty from a lump of twisted metal.

    thisisnotaspoon
    Free Member

    i m staggered that none of these killers are held accountable, not even taken for retraining, suspended never mind criminal proceedings, phone hackings worth tying up the courts for 9 months but levels of incompetance that lead to a healthy lads death are not?

    1) He had sepsis, I’ve never heard of it befor the article so won’t go read wiki and become and internet expert, but the BBC article says 37,000 die each year from it, there are only 145,000 Dr’s in the NHS, so if you want to prosecute each one each time someone dies of sepsis then you’d better plan on moving to another country as the NHS won’t have any Dr’s left in 5 years.

    2) They didn’t kill a healthy lad, they failed to cure a very sick one.

    dbcooper
    Free Member

    FYI My youngest girl nearly died of sepsis, there was a way the Dr’s could have seen it coming. My husband wrote to the PCT and pointed out how they could have seen it coming. As far as I know they have plans to incorporate his suggestions.

    BigButSlimmerBloke
    Free Member

    i m staggered that none of these killers are held accountable

    if you have evidence of there being something to be accountable for would you not be better taking it up with the police rather than a mountain biking forum?
    Or are you one of these people who thinks that the NHS should be funded like Ryanair but should still provide a business class service?

    globalti
    Free Member

    It’s annoying to see people attacking the NHS when they are lucky enough to be able to benefit from the best free healthcare in the world. Anywhere else in the world you need to be either extremely wealthy or extremely lucky, otherwise your doctor or hospital really could kill you through sheer incompetence. Friends of mine in Africa will pay a fortune and take massive risks just to get out of Africa for medical treatment.

    It’s doubly annoying when you have friends and family who are health professionals and you have first-hand knowledge of their dedication and have seen the stress they suffer when things do go wrong for them.

    The OP ought to ask the mods to remove or re-write the title to this thread as it offends me and many others, I’m sure.

    mt
    Free Member

    The Stafford 1200 anyone? Our we all happy with what happened there, are we happy with the persecution of the person that went public?

    “It’s annoying to see people attacking the NHS when they are lucky enough to be able to benefit from the best free healthcare in the world.”

    It’s good but not the best, it’s not luck it’s bought and paid for out of our taxes. It can be outstanding but can also be the complete opposite for some, they and their families can be treated better when things go wrong.
    It’s not a sacred cow never to be criticised, the NHS must open to comment and criticism when things go wrong, that’s part of how the service will improve. I’d not like to be without it but I’d like to be better as I’m sure you all would.

    packer
    Free Member

    Surely the problem here is not that individuals in the NHS are incompetent and making mistakes, it’s that the service as a whole is stretched to breaking point.

    If so then the answer is not punishing or blaming anyone, but to increase investment in the service.

    robdixon
    Free Member

    By its own admission, one in 20 deaths in NHS hospitals are avoidable, and that is very likely to be a conservative estimate given the massive under reporting of adverse events.

    What’s key is how quickly learning is applied to avoid mistakes being repeated and on that front the NHS scores very badly – it takes decades for best practice to be uniformly adopted by all Trusts – great if you’re a patient in one of the better trusts and risky if you’re in one of the Trusts that are improving slowly.

    Up to 2/3 of NHS staff at some Trusts would recommend their own organisation to their families based on the quality of care and thats speaks volumes about the size of the problem and opportunity for a step change in quality and safety.

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/health/healthnews/9901354/Doctors-dont-trust-their-own-hospitals.html

    Drac
    Full Member

    Thisisnotaspoon, lots of jobs dont have a text book answer, but with experience, and training things get done,advice is sought and very occasiionaly something may go wrong, thats when the H and S, police, regulatory bodies and customers step in and ask questions and sometimes prosecute, sometimers resulting in prison sentances or bankruptcy, nhs staff just move somewhere else.

    The NHS deals with millions of people 24 hours a day 365 days a year. If you are indeed an Ex-NHS employee then you’re a blinkered one. Very occasionally things go wrong in the NHS, they get fined massively, compensation claims go in and staff are struck off. Having dealt with a disciplinary case for just such a thing I know this to be very much true. That’s a tragic story but very few details are given on it. Sepsis is now a very high priority part of the NHS, there’s some very strict protocols to follow, I’d not be surprised if that case was partially behind it.

    My wife developed sepsis after our first child, the GP nearly missed it I annoyingly didn’t spot it either. It did just look like anaemia from childbirth. I was out for the day with our 5 day old child when I got a phone call from my wife saying she felt worse, I advised her to visit the local MIIU. She did and the same GP came to see her and this time spotted it, the GP was mortified she’d missed it.

    My second child developed it the night after she was born, a HCA spotted it and alerted the Midwife who contacted SCBU. Within 10 minute she’d had IV antibiotics which saved her life, she looked bloody awful when I got there.

    Tragic when things go badly wrong in the NHS but no matter how many protocols you set up they will happen, Patients don’t always tell you there history, how the feel or what past medics history they have. Al this can make it very difficult to asses, diagnose a patient. Then there’s the case that sometimes symptoms don’t actually show how you’d expect for a certain illness or injury.

    suburbanreuben
    Free Member

    The only serious criticism of the NHS was its poor record on keeping people alive. On a composite “healthy lives” score, which includes deaths among infants and patients who would have survived had they received timely and effective healthcare, the UK came 10th.

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/health/nhs/10907823/Britains-NHS-is-the-worlds-best-health-care-system-says-report.html

    olddog
    Full Member

    You’ve got to compare NHS to other healthcare systems as well to understand whether it is good or bad on this. (as per Telegraph story above)

    And to contradict myself – the NHS is not a single entity, certainly the healthcare delivery part of it isn’t. It’s hundreds of hospitals and other secondary care units plus 1000s of primary care providers – over 1 million staff.

    The way to minimise problems in such a system is through (a) enough and properly trained staff (b) creating culture of incident reporting and review – the first is something that can be done for the NHS as a whole, but healthcare is expensive, how much tax do you want to pay? The second, although can be encouraged and monitored, is substantially down to culture and governance in the individual organisations.

    El-bent
    Free Member

    It’s not a sacred cow never to be criticised, the NHS must open to comment and criticism when things go wrong, that’s part of how the service will improve. I’d not like to be without it but I’d like to be better as I’m sure you all would.

    But this isn’t about improvement, the OP and his ilk, are merely attacking it because it is “socialised healthcare”.

    ernie_lynch
    Free Member

    Up to 2/3 of NHS staff at some Trusts would recommend their own organisation to their families based on the quality of care and thats speaks volumes about the size of the problem and opportunity for a step change in quality and safety.

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/health/healthnews/9901354/Doctors-dont-trust-their-own-hospitals.html

    I’ve looked at your link and I can’t see any evidence that refers to alleged negligence by healthcare workers, which is the OP’s point and what this thread is supposedly about.

    There can be all manner of reasons why doctors and nurses might not recommend their hospital to their friends and families, eg, understaffing, lack of funding resulting in poor hygiene levels, lack of available procedures, poor patient food, lack of medical equipment, etc, none of which is necessarily the result of negligence by healthcare workers – the OP’s point.

    Junkyard
    Free Member

    i m staggered that none of these killers are held accountable,

    there is a difference between failing to diagnose a disease and killing someone.

    one in 20 deaths in NHS hospitals are avoidable

    100% of all accidents are avoidable [but only after the event].
    re : http://www.telegraph.co.uk/health/healthnews/9901354/Doctors-dont-trust-their-own-hospitals.html

    12 per cent said they disagreed or disagreed strongly

    Probably a more accurate way of reporting it if slightly less sensationalist

    Tragic when things go badly wrong in the NHS but no matter how many protocols you set up they will happen,

    THIS we need to be able to differentiate between tragic error and incompetence Knee jerk reactions from NHS haters is unlikely to be helpful in doing this.

    olddog
    Full Member

    Also, the 2/3rds point is misleading as well – only 12% expressed a negative view – with 25% as neither positive or negative – and for this to be any use you’ve got to benchmark the results against other systems.

    What is more useful and interesting is the variation between the trusts and looking at why those that score very badly did so.

    Drac
    Full Member

    THIS we need to be able to differentiate between tragic error and incompetence Knee jerk reactions from NHS haters is unlikely to be helpful in doing this.

    /takes deep breath.

    I agree with Junkyard.

    The media is very deliberate in some of their reports in hiding details the investigation will be there for the public to see so not sure why they do this other than to sell papers. This leads to people ranting “Bloody NHS”, there’s ways to complain all trusts now have policies and contact points. I here people moan every day about the service they receive but they choose not do anything official because they can’t be arsed. Good on this family for pursuing such a thing, there’s another mother who set up a contact point for NHS trusts to contact her about a rare condition her son died of after it was missed but the NHS. Not sure I can give details so I won’t.

    The NHS is very much under huge threat of going private, you will then need to pay for you care in cash, loans of insurance. Good looks in getting a cheap insurance if you have any genetic problems are you family has a complex medical history. And don’t think for one minute the care you will get will be any better, it won’t as everything will be done for profit so they’ll have to financial justify why they used certain procedures and items.

    Sancho
    Free Member

    stupid headline stupid reporting and stupid forum title,

    I just wish people would stop thinking everyone can be cured and that people die from diseases etc.
    Its not down to money or bedside manner, or incompetence, its just incredibly difficult to save peoples lives when the diseases are so difficult to pin point and treat effectively.

    hopefully the totalshell can learn a bit more before posting such stupid nonsense

    wanmankylung
    Free Member

    The NHS is staffed by people. People make mistakes. You show me someone who never makes mistakes and I’ll show you a liar.

    My job involves assessing people to determine if they are safe to go home from hospital with any one of a hundred levels of support. I have to use my judgement to make a decision. I have an incomplete set of information on which to base that decision. Patients lie and patient’s family members lie. I don’t always get it 100% correct and people do occasionally end up back in hospital. Some people go home and instantly get a different illness which sends them to intensive care. Some people leave hospital really safe on their feet without any walking aids and completely independent with all daily tasks but as soon as they go home they fall and bang their head and die – could you see that coming or cope with the mental doubt that you could have done something different when you couldn’t possibly have predicted that outcome? And all that for less than £30k/yr…

    I hope there are no perfect people working in the NHS as it is not the place for them.

    thejesmonddingo
    Full Member

    I assume the OP has private medical insurance,which is freely available in this country,and so has decided to avoid the risky NHS.I have looked after a few people who have had poor experiences of private medicine,but I am sure he doesn’t want to hear about them.

    wwpaddler
    Free Member

    Mistakes / misjudgements happen because human beings are involved and human beings will always make mistakes. Some of us have jobs where the consequences of these errors are minor and insignificant, others have jobs where the consequences can be life changing / ending. To combat this you have to have back up systems but these cost money and each back up system you add has diminishing returns attached to it so at some point it’s not worth adding a back up system to the 1,2 or 3+ systems already in existence.

    We all have multiple ways of gaining access to the NHS be it GP, ambulance, A&E, NHS Direct, midwife, community nurse etc. unfortunately if they all make the same / similar mistake / misjudgement (maybe the patient presents atypically). then the consequences can be tragic.

    wanmankylung
    Free Member

    Out of interest, would the kid on the OP have been able to be treated privately, or would he have been sent to the NHS because there was no profit in treating him or he was too complex a case?

    piemonster
    Full Member

    stupid headline stupid reporting and stupid forum title,

    +1

    barnsleymitch
    Free Member

    To the OP: Yes, there are staff in the NHS that could be deemed incompetent, to use your terminology. However, there are thousands more that do an incredible job under sometimes extreme circumstances that never attract the attention of the media. Tell me, in your job, do you ever have to make decisions that could result in this kind of tragedy? I do, day in day out, and guess what? Sometimes things go wrong. Before you start writing inflammatory thread titles and using phrases like ‘these killers’, stop and think for a minute. How would you feel, knowing that you had set out in your career wanting to help people and ‘do no harm’ that your actions may have contributed to a persons death? Cases like this are tragic enough without resorting to hysteria, scapegoating and branding people killers.

    cheers_drive
    Full Member

    Making a mistake under pressure whilst trying to save someone’s life who would otherwise die – as many would without the NHS – is very different from the institutional bad practise and cover ups such as Stafford. The former is unfortunate to say the least but is preferable to a US style the NHS being destroyed by ambulance chasers, the latter should be eradicated and those responsible prosecuted accordingly.

    ChubbyBlokeInLycra
    Free Member

    If the NHS has one serious fault, I’d say it’s a blame culture in senior maangement who see problems as being someone’s fault and resolution is by way of finger pointing and scapegoating, instead of maybe being systemic problem that may need changes to the organisation, practices, whatever. And that can act as a pretty effective block to implementing the changes which need to be made to improve the service. All of which can be prety demoralising for front line staff, many of whom not only work incredibly hard but do so often under extreme stress, and in return are accussed of incompetence for making mistakes that most of us would never put ourselves in a position to make.

    Missidentify a patient’s x-rays, patient who needs cancer treatment doesn’t get it, dies, while patient who doesn’t have cancer starts an invasive, distressing and totally unneccessary course of treatment. If that was you who got that wrong, could you live with it?

    jackthedog
    Free Member

    OP – if you could click your fingers and close the NHS to new patients right now, would you?

    Are you aware that the NHS is being privatised on a massive scale, right now? Does that information make you happy? Tell me the ways in which you think your healthcare provision is going to improve over the next few years? I’m genuinely interested to know what your take is on this.

    teamhurtmore
    Free Member

    Are you aware that the NHS is being privatised on a massive scale, right now?

    Really who’s running the share shop? Where do you register for shares?

Viewing 40 posts - 1 through 40 (of 90 total)

The topic ‘how many more have to die at the hands of the NHS?’ is closed to new replies.