How good are your navigation skills when mountain biking?

Bike Forum

How good are your navigation skills when mountain biking?

58 posts & 45 voices | Started 7 months ago by Sue_W | Latest reply from portlyone

Tags:

No tags yet.

Pages: 12 Next »

Sue_W - Member

Having just spent the day practicing navigation skills for my Mountain Leader (mainly searching for large boulders across bogs and crags!) it made me think a bit more about the importance of being able to navigate properly in the hills regardless of the weather conditions.

It's something that hillwalkers / mountaineers take pretty seriously, but what about mountain bikers? How would you rate your navigation skills - would you be ok if the weather changed to zero visability? Or if the trail didn't appear on the ground the same as on the map?

Some of the navigation skills for mountaineering are transferable to biking, such as identifying landscape features, but is there a mountain biking equivalent of pacing and timing to calculate distance?

Posted 7 months ago #
Nipper99 - Member

You shouldn't be on the hill full stop unles you can use map, compass now how to triangulate etc. Not sure if there is a mtb 'naismiths' rule though.

Posted 7 months ago #
RealMan - Member

I managed to get around the wall at afan.

Posted 7 months ago #
crispy bacon - Member

but is there a mountain biking equivalent of pacing and timing to calculate distance?

Yep it's called a GPS

Seriously I always take a map with me just in case but I also run 'My Tracks' on my phone which shows my position Lat & Long.

Posted 7 months ago #
JImmAwelon - Member

Hey Sue, I have been lost plenty of times as a walker in Snowdonia. MTB navigation is a piece of pish compared to walking.

For 1 you are usually following a linear path.
and 2 you have the chance to use a cycle computer to give you an idea of the distance travelled which has got to be so much better than pacing. Most bike leader courses require you to turn up to training with a computer.

James

Posted 7 months ago #
crazy-legs - Member

Generally very good, I'm a bit of a map geek and I have a good sense of direction.

Most embarrassing one recently was a slight miscalculation on High Street in bad weather which lead to an unorthodox but actually quite fun descent. Certainly wasn't the route that I'd planned though!

Posted 7 months ago #
votchy - Member

Mine are crap, only been riding wyre forest for 6 years and still can't find my way round

Posted 7 months ago #
B.A.Nana - Member

being able to triangulate is a bit OTT, but certainly being able to take a bearing, map read and quickly interpret map to ground is pretty important

Posted 7 months ago #
parkesie - Member

Mine are pretty good do alot of walking and riding by map and compass.

Posted 7 months ago #
still s8tannorm - Member

I don't think many mountain bikers think much about it. We offer mtb navigation courses and those who attend are often surprised how bad their nav' skills are and actually just how easy it is to get 'displaced from your map'

I do wonder if the increase in trail centres may have meant a decrease in navigation skills, I don't think the reliance on satnav in cars has helped much either ... there was something on radio 4 that said 'they' expect the general populace to lose the ability to read a map (even a basic road map) within the next 2 generations.

Posted 7 months ago #
matt_outandabout - Member

^ wot still_sandagetbigusernameaboveme said.

Most mtb'ers have v poor nav skills, and things like sat nav and trail centres mean that there are fewer times that we need to break out any form of navigation skilz these days.

(and a good computer + GPS can help bike nav a LOT)

Posted 7 months ago #
ton - Member

mine are very good.
30 years of biking/walking have helped.

Posted 7 months ago #
cheez0 - Member

Have always arrived home after a ride, so I guess my nav skills are OK.

Always carry a compass and map of where I'm riding though, just in case, but also for exploring new areas/tracks. (usually Exmoor)

Posted 7 months ago #
Steve-Austin - Member

Never ever got lost, but i'm never really sure where i am...

Posted 7 months ago #
Sue_W - Member

Ah, that's interesting, I didn't realise there were navigation courses for mtb'ers. What do they cover?

Re the use of computers / GPS etc - I can understand how they are more useful when biking than when on foot (as it's not that easy to hold a map in front of you when on a bike). But there's obviously the possibility of technology failure, so carrying map / compass as back-up makes sense (which many of you seem to do). However, unless practised regularly, do you think map based navigation skills could be lost?

Posted 7 months ago #
kudos100 - Member

Absolute shite. I haven't used a map in years. GPS will be my next purchase.

Posted 7 months ago #
Rorschach - Member

Mine are 100%.I can get lost every time I ride.

Posted 7 months ago #
gusamc - Member

I carry Satmap, relevant OS:50000 and compass (and I used the compass until about a year ago when the Satmap took over).

In unknown areas I tend to read a little bit ahead (map or satmap) and work by feature - stream, end of forest, low point, crossing/footpath etc etc etc - ie turn R after 3 paths and a stream sort of carry on, so you are sort of mentally following the route, and do a map check every so often to confirm it's not gone hideously wrong, you usually have a followable path, so you have something that you can 'assume' you can follow.

As for distance don't know of naismiths for MTB but I know my normal flat speed so can approximate at uphill and downhill - but I can't see it being that close)

I suspect I wouldn't do a new to me 'wilderness route' if I thought the weather would close in, and I also try to plot routes in sort of circle/oval round a middle car park so your bailout is pretty easy (obviously this depends on available tracks)

Posted 7 months ago #
crikey - Member

Not really needed for the kind of riding most folk do, despite some who will claim to venture into the far off wilds. As above, bikes use pre existing trails, so if you get lost, you can always go back.
Maps and compasses? More extraneous stuff to carry in your already voluminous back pack...

Fell runners tend not to carry all that stuff, with much higher chance of being proper lost...

Posted 7 months ago #
ade ward - Member

I have done walking group leader course with a number of night nav So can find my way about ok and in the past done a number of trail quests involving less accurate navigation
For me the gps is another tool used along with map and compass not instead of
Trail quests got a bit boring after gps was allowed it removed some of skill for me

Posted 7 months ago #
buzz-lightyear - Member

"Lost" is a relative term! I've been briefly miss-located on a few occasions in the hills but have developed a strong sense of location and direction.

My rule-of-thumb is that the further from the car and the nearer to dangerous terrain you are, the better your location estimate needs to be. You have to pay close attention to your location at all times in places like Cairngorm and The Cuillin for this reason. Having some sort of "escape plan" for which you reserve enough energy to execute is a good idea. Even then I've had the odd unexpected "mini epic" [remembers exhaustion from a failed attempt to escape a wicked Easter snow storm on the Gleshiel Ridge]

I don't really ride my bike anywhere that needs much nav (it's all pretty, twee hills and woods around here) except following unfamiliar country lanes. Often lanes are very old, sunken and twisty so the vital views you needs to work out where you are are absent. That's when the map comes out. Most of my nav effort is spent trying to locate all the sneaky trails that aren't on any map.

Posted 7 months ago #
allyharp - Member

I have Kenny Wilson to thank for navigational skills. Anyone who's followed more than a handful of his routes will surely have experienced not following a path of any sort, and had to resort to triangulation techniques in the general direction intended.

Posted 7 months ago #
TandemJeremy - Member

I came to mountain biking from hillwalking so being orientated in the landscape is just what you do.

I carry a map in areas I ain't familiar with and consult it but the key thing is to remain oriented. Be aware of direction and the lie of the land

Posted 7 months ago #
thomthumb - Member

my skills are probably above average for mtbers.

some of my mates wouldn't have the faintest idea about reading contours - or even id a bridleway/ foot path.

Posted 7 months ago #
slowoldgit - Member

What TJ said.

Sue, you might find trailquests a good way to learn and practice the skills. And have fun, of course.

Posted 7 months ago #
djglover - Member

As a marshal, I have rescued people off the KIMM with hypothermia in thick clag, so I'd like to think know a thing or two about navigation. However, when cycling, I would much rather follow the gps around. In unfamiliar remoteish terrain I alway have the OS map in the bag with a compass incase of technology failure though.

When fell running in the lakes, I have just set off in a random direction without a map or gps before though. I did get lost in clag, but I didn't die.

Posted 7 months ago #
matt_outandabout - Member

Re the use of computers / GPS etc - I can understand how they are more useful when biking than when on foot (as it's not that easy to hold a map in front of you when on a bike). But there's obviously the possibility of technology failure, so carrying map / compass as back-up makes sense (which many of you seem to do). However, unless practised regularly, do you think map based navigation skills could be lost?

Aye, head down hill...
As TJ says, you can have a great idea of the 'lay of the land' - and only refer to map as and when awkward choices / cunfuzzlement occurs.
I have no fear of being lost - ahem - temporarily misplaced - as it is part of the fun of being out there, besides which I ensure all my staff can navigate to ML standard, so likely have better skillz and opportunity to dust them down and practice than most...
I do think that many people would be able to access far more interesting and varied rides if they had the navigation skills and judgement to head out on more interesting rides than a lot of trail centres offer. Like coaching for skills, maybe spending a bit of money on a training course is better than the latest '2012 uber new supermakeyoubetterriderinBNG forks'....

Posted 7 months ago #
Sue_W - Member

Just to add, far from being a chore or boring, today's navigation training was really good fun. Most of us were already pretty experienced in the mountains, so today was more of a refresher, with more and more difficult challenges being set - cue 'find small boulder in featureless but quite complex terrain off the side of tryfan'

A lot of the skills I'll keep in mind when mountain biking, especially as most of my riding is over the upland expanse of the carneddi mountains with it's maze of sheep tracks. Just glad that I've got about 20 years experince of trotting round the mountains!

Posted 7 months ago #
hsmith - Member

mine are a bit shit tbh but i always ride with someone who knows where they are going, problem solved!!

Posted 7 months ago #
bigj205 - Member

Local trails, I just take my gps, more to record stats than anything else.
Anywhere I don't know I take gps, map and compass.
As a past Outdoor Pursuits instructor I know how to use them
I have never heard of a Naismiths for bikes.... I just estimate, but then I don't really use Naismiths whilst walking either.

Posted 7 months ago #
br1zz - Member

I often come off course on the bike.
The map is in my camelbak, which means stopping, taking it off, unfolding map, finding compass if necessary, etc. it's a right faff !

Also, you can cover 1km in what, a few minutes ? When walking I wouldn't normally take a bearing over much longer than that so you'd have to be stopping all the time !
On the other hand, 20 minutes off course is a long way off course on a bike !

Posted 7 months ago #
druidh - Member

I have to say that I find a visible GPS a lot more useful while cycling than I do when walking, mostly because of the speed differential. Shoot past a turn-off when zipping down a hill and you can travel some distance before realising it, meaning you might have a big climb just to get back on to your route.

I do occasionally practice my micro-navigation skills - just in case the technology fails.

As for an equivalent of Naismiths Rule for bikes - I can't imagine there's anything too useful. I've managed to develop my own formula for longer trips based on a few years worth of data, but even then it needs tweaked according to terrain etc. and it's pretty much useless for shorter distances.

Posted 7 months ago #
grum - Member

I did a day's training with a guy I know from Langdale mountain rescue testing out his navigational skills training on me before setting it up as a business. He seemed to think I was reasonably good.

http://www.mountainsplus.co.uk/

Grew up around lots of hill-walking and map reading though - it's generally me that navigates if I go out in the Lakes with other people, and we very rarely get lost (I've got lost-ish on my own a few times though). Do agree that GPS is very handy for biking though - even just knowing a rough altitude can be v useful.

Posted 6 months ago #
geebus - Member

A lot better/worse now that I've got my old Touch Pro II with massive battery and memory map working nicely :). Five and a half hours and only down to half battery used, with GPS and screen on all the time!

I do have some 'skills', but out of practice in actually using them, so end up floundering around an OS map or print out a bit more than I should when not using the GPS. (To be fair, same before I got the GPS system sorted - I like it more because it means that I can just keep riding without having to stop and work out which turning I'm supposed to be taking every few hundred meters.)

Posted 6 months ago #
seosamh77 - Member

I'm a bit of a map geek, in that, before I travel a route it's pretty much memorised before I set off. I usually only use paper maps when out and I study them alot beforehand, and I generally study satelite imagery too, so I've usually got a fair idea what to expect when out, I pretty much visualise a route in my head. Though i've got a new phone these days, so GPS is a bit of a novelty for me recently.

At the end up though, on a bike, you need to be really lost before you're fecked. As it's quite easy just to track back the way you came. Which is something that is more difficult as say a walker.. For example walk 15 miles, get lost, it's a bit harder to track back than cycling 30 miles and getting lost.

Posted 6 months ago #

RSS feed for this topic

Pages: 12 Next »

Reply »

You must log in to post.

Singletrack Mountain Bike Magazine

Bike Forum

How good are your navigation skills when mountain biking?

Reply »

Don't miss…

Singletrack

Website & Forums

Exits