If time trial bikes are meant to be streamlined / aerodynamic, they dont have dimples like a Golf Ball?

like this?

dimples

zipp wheels do.
i’m sure i read somewhere about someone making tt frames with dimples or a textured finish.

as mrmo said.

I’m thinking it is due to the shapes used… bikes have lots of long tubes, if these were dimpled, then wouldn’t the turbulent flow caused by the first part of the tube start to cause drag on the next bit?
then there’s the question of speeds too, golf balls can fly about at up to roughly 150mph, (according to a 2 second google search!), the mass flow of air across the ball at this speed will alter the reynolds number of the situation.
Sooo, the dimples may not actually provide anything but drag at lower speeds, speeds more comparable to bike speeds.

This is, of course, just guesswork. You could verify things by giving your bike a nice think coating of hammerite, and see if that helps!!! : )

i should also point out, if it makes a difference the UCI will ban it.

It’s not worth the effort at the slow speeds the frame is moving at. A rotating wheel rim is moving a lot quicker hence zipp’s dimples. However, lots of experts don’t think those speeds are high enough otherwise team GB would use Zipp wheels instead of Mavics.

Ridley use some odd paint which allegedly reduces drag, however they also have those strange split forks/seatstay frames so I’m entirely convinced.
Surely having stepped sections would work as well?