Think it’s more about them getting a bigger portfolio of patents with which to counter the constant sniping of M$ and Apple
If they’d developed a mobile OS that was genuinely their own, instead of firstly, copying WinMob, and then, after their boss left the board of Apple during the development of iOS, abandoning the copy of MS’s mobile OS and doing a blatant copy of iOS, then they wouldn’t have a problem. They are being heavily persued in the courts over clear infringement of patents pertaining to Java as well. Eric Scmitt whining about Apple and others purchasing a raft of ‘bogus’ patents because they are ‘afraid to innovate’ is frankly laughable, as Google were the first to offer $4.5billion for them, and were invited to join Apple and MS in a joint venture to secure them, and Google turned the offer down.
If the patents were ok to make an initial offer on, and then lose interest, how come they’re suddenly ‘bogus’ when Google fail to get their hands on them? Google have no coherent policy regarding being a mobile ‘ware creator. They should have just stuck with being the formost search engine and become more closely involved with the development of iOS. Can I attribute any of these claims? If I could be arsed, it’s all over the webz about emails flatly contradicting Schmitt’s rantings about Apple and MS.