Johnbot – Member
"That's what I think is going wrong with GT, there seems to me to be alot of sanitisation on the red to make it safer."
Honestly, I don't think there is, at least not recently (further back I can't speak for, I stopped riding before GT in its present form existed and only started again a couple of years ago). There's quite a lot of changes made to make it more sustainable- like, we (trailfairies) took an unsighted kink out of Falla Brae because it was right after a short sharp descent and was causing noobs to brake heavily and rip the trail to bits. Rather than repair the trail every 6 months we did a wee tweak to remove the cause. Stuff like that. You could call it sanitising I guess but the aim isn't to make it easy, just to make it last. But the red's well designed and pretty safe as it is.
My own opinion, is that really busy trails will tend to be a bit more bland, because a lot of features just aren't practical. You've seen how roots get torn apart by the traffic and the same goes for a lot of dirt work, it needs a seriously armoured surface and perfect drainage and that restricts options a lot. Also needs to be careful of speed change etc, which I gather means that new trails are going to tend to avoid steepness. Jumps need to be fairly tame as the takeoffs and lips blow out so fast, the jump becomes unpredictable. When a feature wears out the question always gets asked whether it should be replaced, since it'll just wear out again. All in all it gets harder to work with the ground that's there, which is a real shame. But I still love the red, it's not difficult but it doesn't have to be.
(stains snobs sometimes slate GT for its lack of technicality, yet nobody says the same of Kirroughtree, which always strikes me as interesting since KT is smoother and more featureless for most of the red)