Top tube is what matters most. Seatposts are adjustable
Well, yes, this is mostly an aesthetic thing. Okay, the background is that someone ordered a custom fillet-brazed frame from me, and he provided the measurements, including “frame size 60.5cm c-t” – so I built a frame which measures precisely 60.5cm from the centre of the BB to the top of the seat tube. The actual top tube is 35mm down from this, to give room for the collar and the fillet.
Now he’s trying to argue that no-one measures frames this way, and I should have made it 60.5cm to the top of the top tube, with the seat tube extending some arbitrary amount beyond that.
So wondering what everyone else thinks – I’ve already checked, and with the odd exception of Surly I can’t find any other manufacturer or framebuilder on the planet who measures frames this way.
In reality, all he’d need to do is put the seatpost up a bit and use a slightly more angled-up stem. The TT length and all other angles are as specified, of course…