Research is very divided on this. Some state that you can frack as close as 250m to a water source others state a minimum of 1000m whilst some think it should never take place. The UK has some of the strictest policies (I use that term loosely, as anything involving energy security can be relaxed) globally.
There’s a new company set up in the UK called Cuadrilla who are drilling for unconventional gas/oil. They’ve been given the go ahead because they could supply up to 1/4 of UK gas demand! The government gets lots of tax and a somewhat stable energy supply. Fracking on a UK level is still small so it ‘shouldn’t‘ have the same effects or anywhere near the same effects as it did in the US.
The US is a different beast all together. In the UK IOCs apply for a licence to drill on the site so the government own all HC resources, therefore rules are stricter and more policies are in place. The O&G in the US on the other hand is owned by whoever owns the land so IOCs organise a contract. This tends to result in more relaxed laws with some detrimental environmental effects, especially on the scale that they take it too!
Anyway, North West Water are clearly not happy with the potential risks and have been undertaking huge studies to check the viability of the drilling. They seem to be happy and considering we have some of the highest water quality in the world I wouldn’t be too concerned. Just glad I don’t live there..
I could go on and on.. think I’ve bored people enough!