Viewing 7 posts - 1 through 7 (of 7 total)
  • Fat front or suss fork?
  • jamiesilo
    Free Member

    to go on a kona unit – steel 29er set up 1×10.
    used as general transporter and off road where tractor’s not worth it.

    could set either up for about £200 or less.
    if fat: i have carbon forks which’ll take up to a knard /rabbithole combo, though i’m thinking knard + p35s or blunt 35 as they’re now called.

    suss fork could be a reba rl 80mm, cheap as chips on merlin cycle just now

    what should i go for?

    singlespeedstu
    Full Member

    The Knard/RH combo is great fun but f’ing awfull in the mud.

    jamiesilo
    Free Member

    aye?
    mud not too much of a prob as don’t live in UK : )
    how is it on tarmac? read that it’s not too bad if not too low pressure?

    singlespeedstu
    Full Member

    No idea “how it is ” on tarmac as I try not to ride on the road. 😉

    cynic-al
    Free Member

    I’ve only ridden fat, and not 29+, it was nothing like suss.

    I tried half fat, I didn’t see the point at all.

    coastkid
    Free Member

    Knards on Rabbit Holes fly on tarmac!, agree crap in mud!

    front 29+ on a 29er rear would be fine, half fat makes no sense at all- I have a mates Jones SS with fat front sitting here, did nothing for me compared to 29+ each end-until it rained! 🙂 full fat on Nates now for slop trails!

    takisawa2
    Full Member

    Krampus I tried was nothing like I expected. It rolled as well as the Ralphs I use. 29+ front for me come spring.

Viewing 7 posts - 1 through 7 (of 7 total)

The topic ‘Fat front or suss fork?’ is closed to new replies.