So are we proud of our investigative journalism to the point that we'd be content to not win the 2018 WC host role because panorama and the sunday times peed in FIFA's pot...
...or does the lucrative ends of the tournament justify a more cynical silence as to the means?
How moral should we be?
EDIT: sorry, bit of background:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/9238520.stm
England are "underdogs" to win the right to host the 2018 World Cup according to the bid's chief executive ahead of Thursday's vote by Fifa.
Andy Anson is concerned about the impact of a BBC Panorama programme investigating the bidding process airs on Monday (2030 GMT).
"It's a small group of 22 people. If you hurt one of them it has an impact on others, that's inevitable," he said.
"It is certainly not going to win us any votes."
The England 2018 team fears there could be a backlash against the bid from Fifa executive committee members meeting in Zurich.


