Enduro rider caught...
 

[Closed] Enduro rider caught doping*

Posts: 40432
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Didn't see this on the forum yet, quite surprised at the wishy-washy response to this - although I suppose the topic has gone nuclear since this.

So who's your money on?

[url= http://wideopenmag.co.uk/news/17368/doping-hits-the-mountain-bike-scene ]http://wideopenmag.co.uk/news/17368/doping-hits-the-mountain-bike-scene[/url]

* sort of


 
Posted : 11/01/2013 2:23 pm
Posts: 66087
Full Member
 

Not named? WTF?


 
Posted : 11/01/2013 2:24 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

6 month ban - September to March

W.
T.
F?


 
Posted : 11/01/2013 2:27 pm
Posts: 9058
Free Member
 

Far, far too lenient.
We cannot afford to get tarred with same brush as the roadies.
I really hope that when he returns to racing (actually I hope he will do the decent thing and not return but the kind of person who cheats like that is unlikely to the decent thing) that the other riders will get together and refuse to race against him. All on the start line, we won't begin until he is removed. It would put the organisers of his first race in an awkward position but I think peer pressure of that kind will be a bigger disincetive than bans or fines.
.
Actually, where do organisers stand? Could they have a rule saying they will refuse entry to anyone who has ever failed a drugs test? I know there were issues with lifetime bans from team GB at the olympics but could race organisers just say we aren't having you, go away?
.
I know there are other ways to cheat but drug taking is a deliberate, premeditated action, not a lapse of concentration or spur of the moment error and we cannot afford to give second chances to these people.


 
Posted : 11/01/2013 2:32 pm
Posts: 6
Free Member
 

odd behaviour from the FFC, giving the rider a ban during the off season.
Surely naming and banning properly seems more in order?


 
Posted : 11/01/2013 2:45 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

probably a french dude, hence all the secrecy and convenient ban dates.


 
Posted : 11/01/2013 2:48 pm
Posts: 40432
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Wonder if that indicates the rider could be of the French persuasion?

Can anyone find a results list online? Seems to have gone from the Avalanche Cup website.

Conspiracy alert!!!


 
Posted : 11/01/2013 2:49 pm
Posts: 6
Free Member
 

I assume a French rider as FFC have the jurisdiction over the case?


 
Posted : 11/01/2013 2:54 pm
Posts: 9058
Free Member
 

[IMG] [/IMG]
.
.
[IMG] [/IMG]


 
Posted : 11/01/2013 2:54 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Dan Atherton

😉


 
Posted : 11/01/2013 2:57 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Well done on finding the results.


 
Posted : 11/01/2013 2:57 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Dunno who this is, but the positive test is for the same diuretic that Kolobnev was done for during the 2011 TdF - he was eventually cleared of intentional doping due to traces of the drug being found in an over-the-counter medecine that he's been recommended by his doctor.

Hopefully the FFC have seen evidence to suggest that the positive test is from this type of contamination and that's why they've handed down a minimum ban.

However, without anything to support this it's just as easy to start getting outraged and fire up the pitchforks.

Regarding race organisers, I think that if races are sanctioned by the national federations then they have to abide by the WADA code, so they can't impose extra punishments on riders who have served their ban (similar to what overturned the team GB/BC ban on former dopers).

It's a different story for non-sanctioned races, they can do what they want. To be honest I thought that the Megavalanches were unsanctioned!


 
Posted : 11/01/2013 2:58 pm
Posts: 3722
Free Member
 

That's 2011. You need this one...

[img] [img]

Ash from TransProvence is all over this and fuming!

EDIT - whoops!


 
Posted : 11/01/2013 2:59 pm
Posts: 40432
Free Member
Topic starter
 

I assume a French rider as FFC have the jurisdiction over the case?

La Reunion island is a French territory.

So J Absalon is in the frame as well as the dedicated enduro riders. Hmmmm.


 
Posted : 11/01/2013 2:59 pm
Posts: 9058
Free Member
 

The doping took place at the Megavalanche event on 26th November 2011 in St Paul (Reunion) and the result established on 20th December 2011. It took until May 2012 for the report to be made and conveniently took until 6th September 2012 for action to be taken. Thus the racer has been allowed to race a full season following the doping coming to light.


Can you edit yours Rikos to save a bit of confusion? Don't want another Lord McAlpine incedent now do we (whole other can of worms there!)


 
Posted : 11/01/2013 3:00 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Enduro rider caught doping

Jeez, really?? The last thing i'd want to do before doing an enduro is smoke a joint 😯


 
Posted : 11/01/2013 3:01 pm
 MSP
Posts: 15842
Free Member
 

We cannot afford to get tarred with same brush as the roadies.

I have to laugh at people who seem to think that drugs are only used in road cycling, they are just as rife in every other cycling discipline and any other sport.


 
Posted : 11/01/2013 3:05 pm
Posts: 3722
Free Member
 

Ah, @TransProvence says that anyone on the 2012 results list is NOT the guilty party. So we need to compare the two and see who's missing from the 2012 sheet I posted...here this time to avoid any Lord McAlpine-isms...

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 11/01/2013 3:06 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Not sure you can do it like that Rickos - drug testing is done for at least the first 3, and then on randomly selected riders, even if they didn't finish. So you need the full START lists, eliminate all FRA/REU riders who did the 2012 edition, then work out who didn't ride/isn't riding in the ban period.

Or just wait for the riders name to leak.


 
Posted : 11/01/2013 3:14 pm
Posts: 40432
Free Member
Topic starter
 

There's three absent from 2011's top five Rickos.

Amour and two Wildhabers.


 
Posted : 11/01/2013 3:14 pm
Posts: 2432
Free Member
 

The French forums are all over this. It appears there isn't too much [i]love[/i] for the guilty party 😉


 
Posted : 11/01/2013 3:17 pm
Posts: 40432
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Gotcha. 😉


 
Posted : 11/01/2013 3:23 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Very clever ocrider.

This may help others that are as thick as me.

http://translate.google.com/#fr/en/amour


 
Posted : 11/01/2013 3:29 pm
 ianv
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

The French forums are all over this. It appears there isn't too much love for the guilty party

which ones? I looked on bigbike and 26in and there was nothing.


 
Posted : 11/01/2013 3:35 pm
Posts: 919
Free Member
 

Well perhaps the fans (us etc) should find out who it is and out them. As too should the sponsors.

It would be a shame if this is kept quiet.

If you cheat at this level you really should be banned for life. If you know you cheated and got caught there is no excuse. The sport should be trying to be a role model FFS !


 
Posted : 11/01/2013 3:40 pm
Posts: 66087
Full Member
 

ocrider - Member

It appears there isn't too much love for the guilty party

Is it Bert Jetaime?


 
Posted : 11/01/2013 3:41 pm
Posts: 251
Full Member
 

[i]Well perhaps the fans (us etc) should find out who it is and out them[/i]

they're named in this thread.


 
Posted : 11/01/2013 3:41 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I'm going to hazard a guess that if it's who I think it is, it's likely to be a mistake. My local chemist warns me every time I get something whether or not it's likely to lead to a failed doping test (maybe Frank Schleck needs to use my chemist too). About 50% of what I get fits into that area and you'd have to be a moron to dope at the Mega for such a low placing.


 
Posted : 11/01/2013 3:45 pm
Posts: 251
Full Member
 

[i]you'd have to be a moron to dope at the Mega for such a low placing[/i]

most of us would be quite happy with 4th 🙂

Maybe they were just doping generally, not just for that race?


 
Posted : 11/01/2013 3:47 pm
Posts: 9058
Free Member
 

you'd have to be a moron to dope at the Mega for such a low placing.


You didn't ocrider's hint then?
I know it's not a podium but it's not far off
.
[EDIT] waswas beat me to it. Name ans shame away.


 
Posted : 11/01/2013 3:49 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Ah... my bad, wasn't reading properly.


 
Posted : 11/01/2013 3:54 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I even included a link for all the thick people, I was expecting to get told to remove it because it was too obvious!


 
Posted : 11/01/2013 3:54 pm
Posts: 34456
Full Member
 

this rider always seemed as miserable git

when Al Stock joined the kona enduro team there seemed to be a noticeable lack of love from the guy

i wonder what kona thinkabout all this

ill pop over to their fb page and ask......

oh and an off season ban is a ****ing joke


 
Posted : 11/01/2013 3:58 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I'm going to hazard a guess that if it's who I think it is, it's likely to be a mistake. My local chemist warns me every time I get something whether or not it's likely to lead to a failed doping test (maybe Frank Schleck needs to use my chemist too). About 50% of what I get fits into that area and you'd have to be a moron to dope at the Mega for such a low placing.

Assuming what you are buying/getting is for medical purposes then so long as you can produce a TUE (therapeutic use exemption) then you able to take that drug. It might not apply to all drugs, but if you need something for medical reasons then you are able to take it.

Most chemists wouldn't have a clue what it on WADA prohibited/banned list. It also isn't for the chemist to tell you if something is banned, that is ultimately down to the athlete to check via WADA.

As for this case in particular, the drug found is a masking agent that can be used to cover up another banned substance. I doubt it would be taken by mistake.


 
Posted : 11/01/2013 4:02 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

mtbmatt - Well I don't ride in anything sanctioned but the last few times I've been in there they usually ask me if I'm doing sporting events if I'm taking anything involving opening the airways (so a bad chest/cold). I have two lots of stuff at home they were clear contain prohibited stuff. If I was a serious competitor I'd be going to the docs about it but obviously it's not so important.


 
Posted : 11/01/2013 4:04 pm
Posts: 34456
Full Member
 

does this mean that I move up 1 position at the megavalanche last year?


 
Posted : 11/01/2013 4:06 pm
Posts: 9058
Free Member
 

i wonder what kona thinkabout all this

ill pop over to their fb page and ask......

oh and an off season ban is a ****ing joke


If enough of us do (not just STWers but bikers in general) Kona will have no wish to be associated with him and will let him go. Hopefully they will do that of their own accord.
It's going to take some pressure from the fans/other riders to stop him getting sponsored again. If they won't ban him properly there are other means of stopping him racing again.
.
As someone said above, accidents happen, but not with masking agents.


 
Posted : 11/01/2013 4:17 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

That ban and the anonymity are a complete and utter joke.

Having said that, (and I know internet rumours and angry mobs are great fun), before we all march off en-masse to the Kona Facebook page, should we maybe consider the whole 'innocent until proven guilty' thing?


 
Posted : 11/01/2013 4:22 pm
Posts: 9058
Free Member
 

He must have been proven guilty for him to be banned. But generally yes. However, somewhat tricky if he's been given anonymity.
Am I in danger of creating a Lord McAlpine incedent all of my own?


 
Posted : 11/01/2013 4:26 pm
Posts: 40432
Free Member
Topic starter
 

before we all march off en-masse to the Kona Facebook page, should we maybe consider the whole 'innocent until proven guilty' thing?

And that his identity is hearsay at the moment of course.

🙂


 
Posted : 11/01/2013 4:50 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

And that his identity is hearsay at the moment of course.

Yeah, that's what I meant! Clearly whoever it is is guilty!


 
Posted : 11/01/2013 4:52 pm
Posts: 9058
Free Member
 


And that his identity is hearsay at the moment of course.

Yeah, that's what I meant! Clearly whoever it is is guilty!


Good point.
Agreed.
.
...the anonymity are a complete and utter joke

Bugger. How do we find out for certain?


 
Posted : 11/01/2013 5:01 pm
Posts: 1711
Free Member
 

The only sure way is to analyse pictures of his face and compare his jaw line. The roadie forum people are experts at this.


 
Posted : 11/01/2013 5:11 pm
Posts: 2432
Free Member
 

which ones? I looked on bigbike and 26in and there was nothing.

OK, only the one, but by far the most active forum (velovert)

Although as people have pointed out, it wouldn't take a genius to hold the results sheets of the 2011 and 2012 Reunion Megavalanche and compare and with a little extra information, can reduce the number of suspects down to one name.

It is imperative that the athlete is properly licensed to the federation at the time of the hearing of them to legally apply any sanction. However, in this case, the athlete concerned has, according to what the federation told me on the phone this morning, not held a FFC licence in 2012. Therefore it was up to the AFLD (Agence Français de Lutte contre le Dopage) to decide upon the penalty.

Loose translation from http://justaboutvelo.com/2013/01/chasser-puis-cacher-pour-ne-pas-que-ca-se-sache/
The same blog entry has deduced that the incriminated has a right to demand anonimity and this seems to have been granted, although IMO its a damn good way to get a mob of angry villagers sharpening their pitchforks and lighting their torches.


 
Posted : 11/01/2013 5:30 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

How long before the top hit on google for Lord McAlpine brings readers here?


 
Posted : 11/01/2013 5:40 pm
Posts: 9058
Free Member
 

Only if we keep mentioning Lord McAlpine


 
Posted : 11/01/2013 5:45 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

A French Enduro rider done for doping? How come Juan hasn't been on this thread yet?


 
Posted : 11/01/2013 5:47 pm
Posts: 30656
Free Member
 

Lord McAlpine's been done for doping in an enduro race?

Who'd a thunk it.


 
Posted : 11/01/2013 5:57 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

If the stuff about the FFC licence is correct then can it be the rider who has been mentioned earlier?
Is he not French and has he not been racing some the Super Enduros in 2012 - for which you would need a full licence of some sort?. Maybe the rider in question has dual nationality and has a licence with their second country?


 
Posted : 11/01/2013 6:34 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

A French Enduro rider done for doping? How come Juan hasn't been on this thread yet?

No one has mentioned Stans rims yet. Now that I have he will be along shortly to bash them no doubt.


 
Posted : 11/01/2013 6:50 pm
Posts: 40432
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Lord McAlpine's been done for doping in an enduro race?

Does he ride an Orange McAlpine?


 
Posted : 11/01/2013 7:16 pm
Posts: 30656
Free Member
 

Does he ride an Orange McAlpine?

More than likely. After all, it is the chosen bike of p[b][NOPE! - MODS][/b]


 
Posted : 11/01/2013 7:17 pm
Posts: 34456
Full Member
 

so far im the only person ranting on fb

So if a Kona team rider received a ban and was stripped of his wins for doping, would kona still have love for the man?
Unlike · · 3 hours ago
You and Tim Hutchinson like this.

Chris Kimberley and if say the riders own cycling body had responded with a laughable 6 month off season ban......
3 hours ago · Like · 1


 
Posted : 11/01/2013 7:19 pm
Posts: 3188
Full Member
 

link to velo vert forum :

http://forum.velovert.com/topic/95139-dh-race-world-cup-series/page__st__20160

news announced on page 1345 .


 
Posted : 11/01/2013 7:50 pm
Posts: 34456
Full Member
 

from fbook

The Kona Bicycle Co. What's going on? We don't have the Oprah channel here.
44 minutes ago · Like


 
Posted : 11/01/2013 9:55 pm
Posts: 806
Free Member
 

Zangolin - you can get round the licence thing at SuperEnduro by getting an Italian doctors cert that you are fit to race, I.e. physically ok.


 
Posted : 11/01/2013 10:43 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Zangolin - you can get round the licence thing at SuperEnduro by getting an Italian doctors cert that you are fit to race, I.e. physically ok.

Ah interesting - I guessed you might be able to race without a licence as per UK enduros etc. Just though it might be very unusual for an elite/pro level racer to not have a full licence?


 
Posted : 11/01/2013 11:22 pm
Posts: 9058
Free Member
 

You can race non-UCI sanctioned races without a licence (for instance 24hr World Champs, organised by WEMBO)
I don't know if the race in question is UCI sanctioned.


 
Posted : 11/01/2013 11:34 pm
Posts: 11809
Full Member
 

4th place

Looked at the wrong results sheet, though Cedric Gracia was in trouble, that would have been an MTB-wide disaster!


 
Posted : 12/01/2013 4:29 am
 hora
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

One of the 2 top finishers?
The article says stripped of all medals so we should find out soon..


 
Posted : 12/01/2013 7:44 am
 hora
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I thought NV competed/finished 2nd in 2011?

The womens winner?...


 
Posted : 12/01/2013 8:07 am
Posts: 40432
Free Member
Topic starter
 

Looked at the wrong results sheet, though Cedric Gracia was in trouble, that would have been an MTB-wide disaster!

Big relief that it wasn't CG!

hora - did you miss the bit where someone told us who it (allegedly) is?


 
Posted : 12/01/2013 10:07 am
Posts: 806
Free Member
 

I would have hoped that if the whole Lance thing taught federations anything, it's the damage to their credibility caused by a token ban.

Amazed the French federation haven't been more open.


 
Posted : 12/01/2013 10:16 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

If it is the previously mentioned rider then, looking at the link to facebook above, Kona would be taking action.

Surely they would already be aware of this? Regardless of any official channels surely as an industry insider they would have heard rumours?


 
Posted : 12/01/2013 10:28 am
Posts: 34456
Full Member
 

The Kona Bicycle Co. Hello Chris, we are looking into this currently. Rest assured that if one of our athletes was caught doping, that is certainly a breach of their contract and the would be dropped from the Kona Team.


 
Posted : 12/01/2013 10:37 am
Posts: 1442
Free Member
 

We cannot afford to get tarred with same brush as the roadies

Why not? It might make people realise that cycling doesn't just happen on the road or track.
And what makes you think off road cyclists don't dope? Because they 'have never tested positive' 🙄


 
Posted : 12/01/2013 10:43 am
Posts: 40432
Free Member
Topic starter
 

The guy identified above is in his late 30s so near the end of his pro career anyway.

Just looking at an interview with him from last year I found this gem...

[b]Race results don’t come for free. Tell us about training: How, where and how much of it?[/b]
It’s my secret. lol But it’s only when you take a pleasure to ride on a bike , and always push your limits . You need to be a challenger rider.


 
Posted : 12/01/2013 10:54 am
Posts: 31
Free Member
 

If it is Karim...then very sad he has trained and ridden with us many times...


 
Posted : 12/01/2013 11:47 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

What would compel someone to contact a complete strangers employer with information based on nothing more than rumours in an atempt to have them sacked? other than being a complete prick of course.


 
Posted : 12/01/2013 11:58 am
Posts: 40432
Free Member
Topic starter
 

You are GW and I claim my £5.


 
Posted : 12/01/2013 7:51 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

As someone said above, accidents happen, but not with masking agents.

It's a diuretic. It's not like you buy them over the counter as masking agents; there are loads of ways to end up taking them without perhaps knowing. I'd be more inclined to see what the real story is before getting all righteous about it. It's entirely possible he was doping but 6-months suggests a technical violation, not that the authority decided he was on a serious dope run.

Even Bassons got a 1-year ban for missing a test from the French authorities (and doping is illegal in France) so I imagine there's more to the six months than just they want to let him off; he's hardly a well known name outside his own particular discipline.


 
Posted : 12/01/2013 8:49 pm
Posts: 34456
Full Member
 

duirdh - Member
What would compel someone to contact a complete strangers employer with information based on nothing more than rumours in an atempt to have them sacked? other than being a complete prick of course.

obviously I am a prick!

but I stand by my actions

its in karim and konas intrests to clear this up as soon as possible


 
Posted : 12/01/2013 9:14 pm
Posts: 30656
Free Member
 

Is duirdh the evil twin of Druidh?

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 12/01/2013 10:01 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Mibbe I'm the evil twin!!

Pretty close username tho. I've thought about asking the mods to change mine to avoid confusion


 
Posted : 12/01/2013 10:11 pm
Posts: 9058
Free Member
 

So, what's the latest news from the rummour mill? Is it the bloke hinted at above or are we still uncretain? Anyone here have any inside knowledge they are willing to divulge? (we promise not to tell anyone)


 
Posted : 18/01/2013 9:46 am
Posts: 34456
Full Member
 

so anyone know anything more about this

cedic gracia and brian lopes were chatting about it on twitter


 
Posted : 29/01/2013 9:43 pm
 hora
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Ressurection. Frenchies say he will be stripped of all wins and titles in goodtime. That says to me a multiple winner...

Anyone?


 
Posted : 29/03/2013 5:40 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Karim Amour of Team Kona was mentioned - but not heard any more about it -so probably not him?.
This quite interesting from back in Jan:
[url= http://www.pinkbike.com/u/mattwragg/blog/Doping-in-Enduro-Crime-and-Punishment.html ]http://www.pinkbike.com/u/mattwragg/blog/Doping-in-Enduro-Crime-and-Punishment.html[/url]


 
Posted : 29/03/2013 6:31 pm
 hora
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

The release said all titles and wins though. So a multiple winner?


 
Posted : 29/03/2013 6:41 pm
Posts: 9058
Free Member
 

Thread resurection: Do we have an answer yet?


 
Posted : 20/10/2013 9:48 am
Page 1 / 2