- This topic has 115 replies, 48 voices, and was last updated 12 years ago by ernie_lynch.
-
Ending National Pay Rates
-
grumFree Member
It has been unfair for a long time that somebody living in a low cost area on a national pay scale will have more disposable income than somebody in a high cost area.
Surely the correct right wing mantra would be that if some people are better off because living costs are lower, then people should move to those areas, thus levelling things out? Rather than whining about unfairness and expecting the government to sort it out.
aye it’s a tricky one – there are so many what ifs that there are always going to be winners and loser whatever decision is made.
And strangely with this government the losers are always women, the poor, northerners etc etc, and the winners are always well off people from the south east.
Labour-run towns and cities in the north west will bear the brunt of massive government council cuts, the M.E.N can reveal today. The interactive map above shows at-a-glance how deprived urban communities will be ravaged by the coalition’s plans – while leafy shires in the south will escape unscathed. Councils in red will lose up to one fifth of their government grants in the next two years, while those in green will see drops of as little as four per cent. The map shows instantly how communities in Greater Manchester, Merseyside, Newcastle, Hull and Central London – which have some of the highest levels of poverty in the country – have suffered the most. It appears to contradict the claim of communities secretary Eric Pickles that his cuts were ‘progressive’ and ‘fair between different parts of the country’.
MikeypiesFree MemberI will be quids in but it will make it hsrder for me to move north as i’ll have to swallow a pay cut.
If it is a lower cost area houses will be cheaper so you will need a lower wage
As for academies, i’ve never seen one that pays anything other than very much the same as the nstional scale
yet but it will happen just wait
anagallis_arvensisFull MemberMikey, yes but swallowing a pay cut of any significance and the knock on effect on pensions would be hard. I would imagine i’d wait till retirement and the do it.
As for local or even school based pay scales… Isnt that just going to cause wage inflation as everyone will want the best?
StonerFree MemberSurely the correct right wing mantra would be that if some people are better off because living costs are lower, then people should move to those areas, thus levelling things out?
indeed grum but with fixed pay rates, currently the increase in demand to work in a preferred location doesnt lead to a bid down in salaries to “level” things out. I imagine one intention is to permit the bidding down of salaries in attractive areas until demand and supply balance.
loumFree MemberIn a way, I’m quite glad they’re going for this and the top rate tax cut, true Conservative idealogical policies.
It will really help define them for those too young to remember the last time. I think a lot of younger voters were struggling to see any clear distinctions between the parties, and were happy to just vote for change, or not even vote.
Previously, I was quite concerned that the media industry support and constitutional changes (removing a large section of anti Conservative voting) would lead to two or three terms for CMD, but not anymore. The Lib Dem involvement will lose them a lot of their traditional support too.
This is probablly the best thing to happen for the Labour party for a long time, demonstrating to the electorate that there are real choices to be made, and any changes will be easily reversed.anagallis_arvensisFull MemberI’m not pleased i was planning to take my teaching talent to go and help the northern scum. Now i may have to emmigrate to Scotchland and then i’ll have to keep my views on their rugby team under wraps!!
mountainmanFull MemberSo how many of us work for minimum wage or just above,teachers don’t thats for sure.
I work in social care,have lots of responsibility only get a fraction of social services,social workers pay.
Still have to run a house and support a family and try to run a car with petrol topping £6.50 gallon and no bus service to speak of ,so car is only option in practical terms as odd shifts and wkends,buses don’t exist on sundays or after 7.00pm if you live out of town.anagallis_arvensisFull MemberWell get a different job then! Isnt that how we roll in this country?
MikeypiesFree MemberSurely the correct right wing mantra would be that if some people are better off because living costs are lower, then people should move to those areas, thus levelling things out? Rather than whining about unfairness and expecting the government to sort it out
possibly true but there are limited jobs with national wages in these area which are much sort after as the wages are above the local level.
loumFree MemberSorry to hear that a-a.
Seems a shame that a policy supposed to promote a “more responsive workforce” has the opposite effect and fixes you where you are, rather than allowing you to move where needed.
But, as I said above, It shouldn’t be long term.And good luck today, should be a great day’s rugby to top a really good tournament.
thekingisdeadFree MemberThis is probablly the best thing to happen for the Labour party for a long time
I’d agree with you if Labour had a half competent leader. Ed Miliband should be slaughtering Osbourne on the tory ideals being introduced…..except he’s not 🙁
loumFree MemberIts certainly better for them than their last leadership contest. 😉
rootes1Full MemberI used to work for the Environment Agency.. they had equal pay across england and wales..
they ended up with lots of people in cheaper parts of the country and struggled to recruit in the Southeast…
over time they have move more and more none location specific jobs to cheaper areas of the country.
MikeypiesFree MemberMikey, yes but swallowing a pay cut of any significance and the knock on effect on pensions would be hard. I would imagine i’d wait till retirement and the do it.
But if your mortage is lower and you stay in the same area it will not be a problem but yes pensions would be lower on retirement 🙁
As for local or even school based pay scales… Isnt that just going to cause wage inflation as everyone will want the best?
What is more likely is that well run and funded schools/LEAs that can and do pay top dollar will attact the top staff and the ones that cant wont. With the budgets as they are there wont be much cash to splash
CaptJonFree MemberIt is a good policy if you want to create infighting in the unions. The govt has already tried to buy off older members of the Teachers Pension Scheme, and older members make up 30% of the unions fighting the changes.
anagallis_arvensisFull MemberBut if i can do ok living here and pay a bigger mortgage i would be better off when i retire up north, cash in equity get somwhere cheaper and all with a bigger pension too!
Zulu-ElevenFree MemberUnless values crash in the South East property bubble and you end up in negative equity, unable to afford anything up north – whereas otherwise you’d have paid off your smaller mortgage up north 😉
anagallis_arvensisFull MemberBut thats an unknown and the houseprice variation will not be reduced by this policy. I have 30 years to go anyway.
stevewhyteFree MemberSo you work down south, get paid more, accrue more capital wealth from investing in property, you get a bigger pension and when you retire you sell your house and have more in the bank.
Quality tory thinking. Its shit like this that really will push some regions over the edge, and not just Scotland.
I would love there to be a refurendum in the Norther counties to see if they want to stay in England or Join Scotland when we go independant.
mrmoFree Memberover time they have move more and more none location specific jobs to cheaper areas of the country.
slightly off topic, why should all jobs be focused on the southeast anyway. Does it not make sense to move as much as possible outside the london bubble.
Do we really need most civil servants in london? as for regional pay? such is life for most people anyway.
stumpyjonFull MemberI consider myself to be right of center, expect people to work for a living, am not a fan of the public sector, don’t have a lot of time for the current arguments over public sector pensions etc. I think a lot of the public sector unions need to grip – right that’s my credentials out of the way.
This current proposal is bonkers! We need to encourage people away from the honey pot areas and I do think someone doing a job, be it teacher or bin man across the country should be paid the same (apply a weighting on top for certain areas, but keep it visible) for the same work (or as commented above more stressful work in the more deprived areas of the country).
Up until now I’ve put the divide and conquer left wing rantings into the same category as the Diana and JFK conspiracies, I don’t think I can do that anymore.
Whilst we’re on mental policies, abolish the 50% tax rate!!!!!
Not withstanding the recent threads around whether people paying 40% tax are wealthy or not I think we can probably agree the people currently paying the 50% rate are not looking down the sofa for spare change. In fact these are the same people who are directors in middling size firms who have been awarding themselves payrises for poor performance whilst holding down the pay of their workforces. Couple with the fact these are not the people who’ll jump ship to the nearest tax haven either.
I didn’t vote for call me Dave, I’m glad I didn’t, but I didn’t think he would be this stupid and selfish and out of touch.
I just wish there was a right of centre party out there that wasn’t the Tories, one that actually had principles (not that everybody would agree with them and that would be a good thing).
v8ninetyFull MemberI just wish there was a right of centre party out there that wasn’t the Tories
Wasn’t that NuLab? Not quite sure where postmodern labour position themselves, they seem to have difficulty stringing a coherent sentence together, unfortunately.
What would it take to bring us to a early general election? I would put a lot of effort into ousting this government sooner rather than later, if I knew how…
projectFree MemberDoes anyone know if the mp,s are going to getter lower wages in the north and scotlandshire, to match the wages of the northerners that actually have a job in the private sector.
Me thinks not.
julianwilsonFree MemberI forgot just how close I am on the political compass thingy to Sinn Fein. 😯
Who’s for an independent Devon then? 😆
ernie_lynchFree MemberI’d agree with you if Labour had a half competent leader. Ed Miliband should be slaughtering Osbourne on the tory ideals being introduced…..except he’s not
It is a fact that the “floating voters”, that rather small percentage of the electorate which are extremely important, and who’s opinions are the only ones that actually matter when it comes to winning elections, prefer a Labour Party which has very simular policies to the Tory Party, otherwise they will simply vote Tory.
So Ed Miliband complies with the very easy and lazy solution of placating the hopelessly irrational floating voters who lack any understanding or commitment (I have considerably more respect for traditional Conservative voters than ill-informed half-wits who think choosing a political party to vote for is like shopping for a pair of shoes).
The alternative to this easy and lazy solution is to provide an inspirational leadership built on sound democratic structures which builds up the base support to such a level that the whims of floating voters become considerably less important.
This however requires a lot of extremely hard work over a considerable period of time and is fraught with difficulties, including the fact that large democratic parties are hard to control and maintain discipline over, and a hostile press has to be bypassed.
So Ed Miliband aware that he probably won’t be around for very long will opt for the easy and lazy solution of allowing the media/press to set the agenda whilst he concentrates on convincing all those who voted Tory last time that he is in fact no different to them – just a lot nicer.
If anyone is unhappy with the state of British politics (the one party Tory/LibDem/NewLabour state) then I would suggest that you blame first and foremost the British electorate. And then secondly, blame the Labour Party for no longer having the courage and commitment to fight for the principles which it was founded to fight. And blame Tony Blair too.
SpudFull MemberI’d love to see how they’ll work this out and implement it. It is open season on the public sector, just because they can. It’ll mean the lowering of standards within organisations as talented staff won’t be attracted to the lower paid areas of the country. No mention of how they can apply this to those of us who have national roles. I’m getting rather sick and tired of the public sector bashing from the all the green-eyed private sector workers, well guess what, it’s not a special club in the public sector, anyone with the right qualifications and skills can apply. Once again it should be raising standards nationally not lowering certain groups’ pay to meet the lowest common denominator.
Zulu-ElevenFree MemberIt is a fact that the “floating voters”, that rather small percentage of the electorate which are extremely important, and who’s opinions are the only ones that actually matter when it comes to winning elections, prefer a Labour Party which has very simular policies to the Tory Party, otherwise they will simply vote Tory.
So, what you’re saying is that in a democratic country, the tory parties policies are fundamentally more palatable to the majority of the public than those of the left wing.
Democracy eh? How much better life would be in the socialist republic of Ernie-land 🙄
ernie_lynchFree MemberSo, what you’re saying is ……..
It’s pretty clear what I’m saying. I like to write in easy-to-understand English.
druidhFree MemberZulu-Eleven – Member
So, what you’re saying isthat England is a right-wing country.
Is anyone surprised?
brFree MemberIts a reasonable proposal, as long as it is across the board and covers ‘all’ the public sector, from Teachers to Nurses to MP’s. But like most things, the hardest bit will be the transition, and of course TJ having his salary reduced 🙂
In a way benefits are already covered as Housing Benefit is regionalised, ie based upon rent.
El-bentFree MemberSo, what you’re saying is that in a democratic country, the tory parties policies are fundamentally more palatable to the majority of the public than those of the left wing.
When it comes to taxation, yes. When it comes to trashing the likes of NHS and other services, no.
People like a bit of socialism when it comes to paying for something collectively, knowing that they could not afford to have it individually.
Zulu-ElevenFree MemberWell, like I say DruidH – thats one of the constraints you get from being a lefty living in a democratic country – every few years you get to see your dreams crushed as the majority of the public remind you that your policies are bollocks 😆
druidhFree MemberZulu-Eleven – Member
the majority of the public remind you that your policies arebollocksnot wantedCaptainFlashheartFree Memberevery few years you get to see your dreams crushed as the majority of the public remind you that your policies are bollocks
Much lollage.
grumFree MemberZulu-Eleven – Member
the majority of the public in the south of England remind you that your policies arebollocksnot wantedTandemJeremyFree Memberso more money to the rich and the richest areas, less money to the poorer.
Terh south east already sucks huge sums out of the economy – and they want more?
Its hardly a surprise but it is vindictive nasty and unfair – there is already London weighting which is unfair in itself
SpudFull MemberThis should go hand in hand with regional levels of income tax and NI too. If the pay of the public sector workers are lower in certain areas then so should costs and this should be reflected in the tax etc that those areas pay. Bet that won’t be altered by Gideon though…
ernie_lynchFree MemberHave you suddenly become a convert to democracy Zulu-Eleven ?
Not long ago you were describing it as a “silly little experiment” which you wanted to get “rid of”
Zulu-Eleven – Member
Dark ages, No Ernie, not at all – far more of a fan of a military coup returning HRH to power and getting rid of this silly little experiment in “democracy”
Posted 2 years ago
Zulu-Eleven – Member
I said that we should get rid of this silly little experiment in “democracy” – and I stand by the argument that its a failed experiment, since we don’t have democracy, we still have a division between classes of legislators and legislatees.
Posted 4 months ago
El-bentFree MemberHave you suddenly become a convert to democracy Zulu-Eleven ?
Now I understand him giving advice out to Druid about feeling crushed. You would feel the same way too if the majority still wanted democracy and thought your little coup d’etat idea was bollocks.
The topic ‘Ending National Pay Rates’ is closed to new replies.