Viewing 14 posts - 1 through 14 (of 14 total)
  • Dinner plates and aero bikes
  • cynic-al
    Free Member

    Been having a good lolling at super aero bikes I’ve seen, often £3k+, with 28T cassettes.

    But some of the prologue riders seem to be on 25s FFS!

    chilled76
    Free Member

    Larger chainring and running higher up the block (bigger cog) makes for less friction losses in the drivetrain.

    One if the negative aspects about srams mtb 1x system is the 10t cog is something like* 15% worse for losses than an 11t.

    *I’m plucking this figure off the top of my head but remember it was a surprisingly large number

    fifeandy
    Free Member

    Also, aero bikes are not exclusively for flat riding, 28 really isn’t that big for a rolling course. Especially if paired with a semi rather than full compact.

    mrblobby
    Free Member

    Larger chainring and running higher up the block (bigger cog) makes for less friction losses in the drivetrain.

    This. Single 58t up front on my TT bike too and 25t or 28t big sprocket depending on course.

    bencooper
    Free Member

    Yup, it always amuses me that people obsess about the slight extra drag of a hub gear, but are happy to run an 11t cog.

    legend
    Free Member

    cynic-al – Member
    Been having a good lolling at super aero bikes I’ve seen, often £3k+, with 28T cassettes.

    What should they be running?

    Is it possible to get cassettes that don’t start at 11?

    I’d like one that was something like 14-30

    PJ266
    Free Member

    I’d like one that was something like 14-30

    Look up cassettes for youth gearing

    fifeandy
    Free Member

    Yes, plenty of options finish at a 12.
    Think maybe some cassettes for junior racing stop at a 14.

    Look up cassettes for youth gearing

    Yeah, a “schoolboy block” as we used to call them. I never found one that went over 25 though, so I gave up looking.

    HoratioHufnagel
    Free Member

    One if the negative aspects about srams mtb 1x system is the 10t cog is something like* 15% worse for losses than an 11t.

    … but remember a drivetrain is something like 95% efficient.

    So if you’re losing 15% extra of a 5% loss, that means a loss of 5.75%.

    So the drivetrain is now 94.25% efficient.

    These minute marginal gains might make a difference at the absolute top end of the sport, but i’d doubt anyone else would notice.

    aracer
    Free Member

    It’s still not comparable though is it? 15% extra loss on a highly efficient drvietrain (I thought it was nominally ~98% efficient when well serviced?) is still far less than the losses in a hub gear. Not only that, but you’re only using the 11T cog for a small part of the time, the time when you’re going really fast and the other losses are huge – the rest of the time you’re in more efficient cogs. A hub gear provides significant losses all the time (not that I think it’s that big a deal, just pointing out the difference).

Viewing 14 posts - 1 through 14 (of 14 total)

The topic ‘Dinner plates and aero bikes’ is closed to new replies.