It was a good design in it's day but let's be honest derailleurs are a poor design from an engineering perspective. A design only embraced by the conditioned masses who know no better.
Bike Forum
[closed]
Derailleurs have had their day. Discuss!
-
Posted 2 years ago #
-
do we really have to feed the trolls?
Posted 2 years ago # -
Keeps 'em quiet and contented. Less likely to question the status quo I guess
Posted 2 years ago # -
Posted 2 years ago #
-
I think it's a miracle they've ever worked. However they seem to be way cheaper than the alternatives
Posted 2 years ago # -
when something like a rohloff/alfine gets light enough (& small enough to fit, sealed, at BB) then, yes, maybe you're right
Posted 2 years ago # -
Posted 2 years ago #
-
Posted 2 years ago #
-
Yeah, your right on both counts. The latter because they're built by people gravitating to the the cities in Taiwan and China trying to earn enough money to send back home.... Do they get a fair wage, do they ****?
Posted 2 years ago # -
fair enough.
Odd timing as today I rode a derailuered (and full suss) bike for the first time in 10months as opposed to an alfined HT.
Hated it for the first 10 minutes or so, as I found the steps between the gears way too narrow and pissing about with the front mech frustrated me at the complexity of getting in the area of the gears I wanted.
Then it clicked, it was much faster - more involved but much faster. Ended up battering my time for a a local loop I do (I know, new bike syndrome and all that) mainly down to the higher top speed, but certainly in part at being able to pick a better gear for each hill as opposed to a grind up.
They are cheap and light and it's not that often they break whilst doing a good job... it'll be a long time before they go I think.
Posted 2 years ago # -
Good point Saccades. Every engineering solution has it's weak points and no design is going to be totally satisfactory.
As regards your times, perhaps it's not just about how fast you go but about enjoying the journey? And....doing a lot less cleaning and maintenance at the end of it!!Posted 2 years ago # -
It's still lighter and cheaper than the alternatives so I think it'll be with us for a while yet.
Posted 2 years ago # -
dérailleurs are rubbish - they wear out all the componemts far too quickly.
It costs me almost as much per mile to run an MTB as a superbike. 10 p per mile in drivetrain wear alone
Alfine is cheaper as well.
Hub £150 other bits up to £250. ( Crankset and shifter) Now price up a complete decent drive train for dérailleurs.Posted 2 years ago # -
Spot on there TandemJeremy. Particularly relevant if you're comparing one Shimano 'system' to another, despite the fact that they're all probably made in Taiwan. I'm a hypocrite after all....
SGS 501 Alfine £135 from bikecomponents.de plus 10 euros postage. Despite that I ending up buying mine from 18 bikes. £220 built up with DT Swiss 4.2d rim and DT competition spokes. I'll take the last one in stock, thankyou!Posted 2 years ago # -
As Keith Bontrager said to this argument, dérailleurs have had many years of development and though an inferior system to internal gears have been refined to such a degree that they work as efficiently as they are ever going to. Internal gears have only been around for a short time and so still need a lot of refinement. I think the OP point would receive a different set of answers in say ten years time.
Posted 2 years ago # -
Not for along time IMO. They're cheaper, lighter, offer a better spread and give better weight distribution. Also, I've never really had a problem with bent mech hangers etc. (although it is obviously an issue), and as long as you don't neglect them they last long enough.
Posted 2 years ago # -
Dérailleurs are not cheaper than an alfine
Complete alfine set up of drivetrain amnd rear whell and crankset is about £250. Get a decent rear wheel, cassette, crankset and shifters for that if you can
add to that the longer lasting chain and sprockets
Posted 2 years ago # -
An Alfine can only give you the range you'd get from one of your chainrings on a derailleured setup. How's that going to work for moderately fit somewhat overweight biffers like me somewhere with some steepish ups like the Qs?
It doesn't. Give me derailleurs.
Posted 2 years ago # -
gearbox in the BB has to be best solution, CofG/unsprung mass wise
Posted 2 years ago # -
bottomless pockets and rohloff.
Posted 2 years ago # -
Depends how picky you are with defining decent TJ. You should be able to get Deore level stuff for that money, and I'd consider Deore to be decent enough.
I have no experience of an alfine though, or any idea what the quality is like.
Posted 2 years ago # -
I must say that in this day and age what with interwebgoogleblogstweets the sheer mechanical crunchiness of a chain being mangled by derailleurs is a refreshing reality check. I hope my car's gearbox doesnt work the same way!
Posted 2 years ago # -
The only solution is singlespeed. £23 for a complete drivetrain (£4 cog, £6 chain and £13 on a Deore chainring), does me a couple of thousand miles on the commute.
</troll>
Posted 2 years ago # -
hub gears OK for commuting and shopping bikes, very old tech 100plus years- weight all wrong still is
bb mounted gears better - might get lighter but still way too heavy
how many bikes in world??? reckon most bikes don't have derailleurs
like my short cage shadow mechs
Posted 2 years ago # -
It costs me almost as much per mile to run an MTB as a superbike. 10 p per mile in drivetrain wear alone
I am genuinely interested in how you worked out the figures, for both, please talk me through it.
Posted 2 years ago # -
G-boxx. the frame will cost a fair few ££ but in teh long run it works out cheaper becuase they come with cranks, shifters etc etc.
or for £700 get a schmidt and have 18 or 20 gears, but you still need a rear mech. I wonder iof you could combine a schimdt and a geared hub?
Posted 2 years ago # -
I don't think the derailleur has had its day by a long way. It may not be perfect but the combination of weight, price, gear spead, ease of use, weight location and durability is well beyond any alternative. Maybe one day, other stuff will surpass it but right now, it's easily king of the hill.
Posted 2 years ago # -
Complete alfine set up of drivetrain amnd rear whell and crankset is about £250. Get a decent rear wheel, cassette, crankset and shifters for that if you can
Wrong end of the argument TJ, 9.9 out of 10 mountain bikes sold have dérailleurs specced as standard, whereas Alfine and the like are almost always after market devices, contra to your argument, you have to find the equivalent specced Alfine bike for the same money as say a Deore (where I'd put Alfine in the Shimano family) for the same money.
As for dérailleurs being rubbish from an engineering POV, OK, the parallelogram version being going nearly 70 years virtually unchanged, designed for 3 widely spaced gears, it happily copes with up to 11, in mud or whatever. Theres plenty of life left there.
Internal hub gears have their advantages, but IMO they are minimal against a well looked after traditional drive-train, and personally I'd find the additional cost of merely a different way to change gears not really worth it...
Posted 2 years ago # -
At least I haven't been speaking in the wind, people finally spell dérailleurs correctly.
Posted 2 years ago # -
theboatman - Member
It costs me almost as much per mile to run an MTB as a superbike. 10 p per mile in drivetrain wear alone
I am genuinely interested in how you worked out the figures, for both, please talk me through it.
2000 miles ( on the tandem which wears drivetrains quickly) is a cassette, 4 chains, 4 chainrings £200+ therefore 10+ p per mile.
Solo not far behind that 2000 miles is one cassette, 2 chains, 2 chainrings over a hundred pounds = over 5 p per mile
roughly speaking.
Posted 2 years ago # -
You can hardly claim tandem use as normal though and I reckon I get a lot more life than you're talking about from my drivetrain which I don't change chain or chainrings on so say even at worst estimate, 2000 miles for £30 (cassette) + chain (£15) plus a middle chainring (£20) plus 1/3 of a granny ring (£3) and 1/3 of a big ring (£10) = £78
so 3.9p per mile.
Anyway, the original premise in this thread was that derailleurs are a poor engineering design. Actually, while they may not be an elegant design (bashing/pushing the chain around over teeth) they are a supremely good real world design where they work with high efficiency, little maintenance and low weight. Internal hubs are currently heavy and inefficient in comparison though they should be lower maintenace. They've still got some catching up to do.
Posted 2 years ago # -
TJ - Didn't you have a Rolhoff once upon a time?
Posted 2 years ago # -
sooty - no - I want one but can't afford the outlay.
Got an alfine coming for the solo
Posted 2 years ago # -
Derailleurs are actually a very good, cheap and simple design that work very effectively in horrific conditions over a wide range of gear combinations. That, my friend, is good engineering.
Internal gearing, as yet, cannot really compete on all fronts.
Posted 2 years ago # -
Hmm, lets see, why are matches still in use if 'far superior' lighters(Bic,Zippo) are available? Because of their simplicity and functionality, that's why.
Posted 2 years ago #
Topic Closed
This topic has been closed to new replies.
