Home Forums Bike Forum Cotic Solaris project **some may find this offensive!**

Viewing 33 posts - 1 through 33 (of 33 total)
  • Cotic Solaris project **some may find this offensive!**
  • rosscopeco
    Free Member

    I’m not sure how this will be received by all on here as it may be a bit controversial but here goes anyway…

    The short story…I’m saving the pennies for a UK custom made frame in either 853 or 931/953 , which will be based loosely on the Solaris geometry but with a few personal tweaks and touches. I’ve ran my Rohloff for almost 10 years now without a hitch so I’d love to experiment a little more with a Bushnell EBB and some custom ‘internal’ routing but that for a future experiment.

    Given that I’ve just started working for myself, every penny is a prisoner so I decided to start ‘playing’ with a standard Solaris frame which I’d been running the Rohloff on with a chain device.

    My number one priority was to properly marry a Rohloff hub to the frame. Not with a stock horizontal dropout (Solaris Simple) which IME is a bit of a faff but with something specifically designed for the job. Over the years I’ve fitted Rohloff’s to every bike in my stable but always felt that I was fitting a round peg into a square hole.

    After much fretting, I opted for a Swinging Stainless dropout from Paragon with Rohloff specific inserts and IMO it works and looks perfect. I also had all the standard cable guides removed and had some custom guide installed in the down tube. I lastly sand blasted the whole rig and sprayed it with a clear lacquer which I’m really loving the look of.

    Surprisingly, the finished product is 1/3 lb lighter at 28.66 lbs inc Time Attack pedals

    So…it is a Marmite thing for you?

    [/url]
    Untitled[/url] by Rosscopeco[/url], on Flickr

    [/url]
    Untitled[/url] by Rosscopeco[/url], on Flickr

    [/url]
    Untitled[/url] by Rosscopeco[/url], on Flickr

    [/url]
    Untitled[/url] by Rosscopeco[/url], on Flickr

    molgrips
    Free Member

    28.5lbs? Sounds very heavy for what it is.

    ononeorange
    Full Member

    Interesting. The front end looks low to me but then I like mine high.

    More importantly – wheels / tyres logo misalignment! What are you thinking of?! Nice paintwork on the house too.

    rosscopeco
    Free Member

    I agree, 28.5lbs is a tad ‘heavy’ by todays standards but to put it in perspective I’ve lost almost half a stone over the last few weeks and it was free! I’m still a little fat but I’m happy!

    Yes, the tyre / wheel aligement is socking, sorry 😳

    ir_bandito
    Free Member

    dropout porn! I love those swingers.
    Did you not think about a non-Rohloff dropout and using a Monkeybone on the brake mount? I think it looks tidier, but would it work with the inboard brake?

    28lbs sounds about right for a steel frame with a Rohly.

    trail_rat
    Free Member

    Yeah even going for stupid light stuff will only lose you about 5lbs

    My ragley td1 w/rohloff dropout and carbon rigids + rohloff is still 24lbs

    Most of the weight difference will be in frame and forks

    D0NK
    Full Member

    DS drop out looks neat, NDS looks rather clunky but I guess that’s a rohloff thing.
    Nice anyway, always fancied a custom frame but reckon I’d make the wrong decisions at design stage and end up paying a fortune for something not 100% – I’m rubbish at deciding things.

    ChunkyMTB
    Free Member

    Only a mother….

    Singlespeed_Shep
    Free Member

    28.5lbs? Sounds very heavy for what it is.

    The Brooks, dropper and rohloff with be at least 15lb’s of that 😆

    Nice bike, big fan of swingers here too.

    rosscopeco
    Free Member

    Did you not think about a non-Rohloff dropout and using a Monkeybone on the brake mount? I think it looks tidier, but would it work with the inboard brake?

    Yeh, I ran the old rig with a self made Monkey Bone. It certainly made things a little easier and looked good but still a faff when the rear wheel needed removing.

    Only a mother….

    😆

    stevenk4563
    Free Member

    Did you get it professionally laquered or was it a rattle can job?

    no_eyed_deer
    Free Member

    My number one priority was to properly marry a Rohloff hub to the frame

    …am I missing something here, or was this not done? I kindof expected to see some amazing Rohloff-hub-based gearbox contraption brazed into the adapted bottom shell of a bike frame.

    That would have been amazing.

    Instead all I can see is a fairly ordinary bike with a bit of dead badger to sit on… 😕

    😉

    TooTall
    Free Member

    Cowardly. No grass, weeds, shabby patio or fence in the picture. How can STW operate with pebbledash, painted wall and gravel in bike photos?

    There are some grey stones in with the red tho – poor job 😀

    Oh – the bike? Tidier than most for the mounting.

    Sven
    Full Member

    That looks close to what I consider a perfect bike!

    timmys
    Full Member

    Brooks + dropper is certainly something I’ve never seen before!

    rosscopeco
    Free Member

    Did you get it professionally laquered or was it a rattle can job?

    Rattle can, I’ll wait and see how it holds up, if it’s crap I can get it clear powder coated for £40 inc a quick sandblast clean.

    Brooks + dropper is certainly something I’ve never seen before!

    Beauty is in the eye of the beholder. It is a Ti brooks if that make any difference 😀

    timc
    Free Member

    paintjob lets it down

    Edric64
    Free Member

    No mud clearance ?

    bikebouy
    Free Member

    Personally I’m not keen on the saddle nor the silly mudguard on the forks, but that’s it really. In the main it looks like a neat bike, bit clean so get it dirty.

    rosscopeco
    Free Member

    No mud clearance ?

    Plenty, the same as the standard Solaris, if not a wee tad better as the chain line is a tiny bit longer to take the slack out of the chain.

    Personally I’m not keen on the saddle nor the silly mudguard on the forks

    Agreed! It doesn’t look the best but it keeps the mud of my face. I’ve yet to see an aesthetically pleasing mud guard

    Edric64
    Free Member

    Just though that the tyre looked really close to the seat tube ?

    oxym0r0n
    Full Member

    I think it looks a lot better than it did with bits of rust everywhere – one of Cy’s reflective wrap stickers would look good I think. Visually the brooks and mudguards look weird but whatever works for you!

    I considered custom before going for my first 29er but was completely unsure about geo so ended up buying a Solaris but would have def bought one with sliders if one was available. All the best with saving for your dream machine!

    Rickos
    Free Member

    Looks like you’ve dropped the bb quite a lot by putting the rear axle higher up, which has seriously slackened the seat angle. Is it not a pig to climb on now?

    honourablegeorge
    Full Member

    Rickos – Member
    Looks like you’ve dropped the bb quite a lot by putting the rear axle higher up, which has seriously slackened the seat angle. Is it not a pig to climb on now?

    About half a degree I’d say. I’m surprised it hasn’t burst into flames altogether

    rosscopeco
    Free Member

    Actually everything is as per the standard Solaris geometry. I spent a lot of time ensuring everything was kept the same. It still climbs like a mountains goat, although I cannie.

    PimpmasterJazz
    Free Member

    *Like*

    mintimperial
    Full Member

    Oooh, I like that. Anyone who does a cut-and-shut to stick Paragon dropouts on a Cotic to fit a Rohloff has to be alright in my book, good work. Plus: bonus nutter points for the Brooks/dropper combo. Splendid.

    Paint job’s a bit boring though, you could have gone for something a bit less, well, grey?

    nosedive
    Free Member

    love that. put a longer fork on and lose the spindly cranks it would be perfect

    garage-dweller
    Full Member

    Disc mount on the pivot bit? If so that is neat.

    Needs a proper colour paint job though that is duller than my mondeo estate.

    seadog101
    Full Member

    It was sounding so nice until I actually saw those dropouts. Agreed they do an efficient job, but at a visual price.

    And that mudguard…. wwyt?

    rosscopeco
    Free Member

    Re the ‘boring’ colour, my thinking was simple in that if I get a nice pretty colour (like cotic orange which I love) then there will be lots of tears and snotters when it inevitably gets scratched and scuffed.

    I think I’m a relatively careful person when it come to protecting the paint finish but given I have a propensity to topple most times I’m out it’s not long before I’ve inadvertantly marked the finish.

    Maybe I should just GAPOB 😉

    zippykona
    Full Member

    That mudguard, my one that only pokes out the back works fine.
    Cut the front off and the ladeez will be round the block.

    Rickos
    Free Member

    Actually everything is as per the standard Solaris geometry. I spent a lot of time ensuring everything was kept the same. It still climbs like a mountains goat, although I cannie.

    Fair enough, must be the photo or something.

Viewing 33 posts - 1 through 33 (of 33 total)

The topic ‘Cotic Solaris project **some may find this offensive!**’ is closed to new replies.