Graun

Beeb

Not sure what old BJ is trying to achieve here..

Personally I’m very much gaining quite a strong dislike for the man.

“ancestral dislike of the British Empire”

Don’t all Americans?

In all seriousness, can anyone link us to what Boris has actually said/written rather than outrage reportage of what he’s supposedly said and how offensive it is?

There was IIRC discussion about this before Obama became president.

http://www.theguardian.com/world/deadlineusa/2008/dec/03/obama-grandfather-maumau-torture

Lol, major history fail:

Mr Johnson … has argued that America would never give up control of its own affairs in the way that the UK has done as a member of the EU.

The US is a union of states who gave up almost ALL their powers to a central government. It was supposed to be a loose federation, not a single country.

So Boris is as wrong as it’s possible to be!

Hmmm; you could argue that having made that mistake 2 centuries ago, he means that we should learn from it and not make it again?

The US is a union of states who gave up almost ALL their powers to a central government. It was supposed to be a loose federation, not a single country

not really comparing apples with apples there.. Boris is talking about the present establishment, not that of individual ‘states’ in a bygone era, so i think the comment is still very much valid.

has he actually said anything wrong? Obama is (according to wikipedia) part-Kenyan – his fathers side is from Kenya, his mothers is from Europe.

“It is deeply anti-democratic – and much as I admire the United States, and much as I respect the president, I believe he must admit that his country would not dream of embroiling itself in anything of the kind.
“It is incoherent. It is inconsistent, and yes it is downright hypocritical. The Americans would never contemplate anything like the EU, for themselves or for their neighbours in their own hemisphere. Why should they think it right for us?”
Mr Johnson refers in his article to the removal of a bust of Winston Churchill from the Oval Office when Mr Obama became president.
“No-one was sure whether the president had himself been involved in the decision,” he said.
“Some said it was a snub to Britain. Some said it was a symbol of the part-Kenyan president’s ancestral dislike of the British Empire – of which Churchill had been such a fervent defender.”

Oh, what a surprise!

Referring to Churchill Bust: “Some said” – quite specifically Boris not saying it

Do these leftie f***wits never actually read what has actually been written before boarding the outrage bus?

Politicians making efforts to influence another countries electoral process. Dreadful

Obama deserves to win because he seems talented, compassionate, and because he offers the hope of rejuvenating the greatest country on earth in the eyes of the rest of us.

If Obama wins, he will have established that being black is as relevant to your ability to do a hard job as being left-handed or ginger-haired, and he will have re-established America’s claim to be the last, best hope of Earth.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/columnists/borisjohnson/3562965/Barack-Obama-Why-I-believe-he-should-be-the-next-President.html

Although his ancestry and skin colour now seem very relevant to Boris.

Do these leftie f***wits never actually read what has actually been written before boarding the outrage bus?

I think we will find out imminently.

quite specifically Boris not saying it

indeed. Simply inferring it. Getting it out in the open there. With the aid of his public profile. Very different.

Boris is a Yank anyway.

Ninfan –
Oh, what a surprise!

Referring to Churchill Bust: “Some said” – quite specifically Boris not saying it

Do these leftie f***wits never actually read what has actually been written before boarding the outrage bus?

Wow, the ironing is strong.

BJ wrote the words “Some said it was a snub to Britain. Some said it was a symbol of the part-Kenyan president’s ancestral dislike of the British Empire – of which Churchill had been such a fervent defender.”

I’d say that makes “part-kenyan president” BJ’s words.

I think when one finds oneself defending BJ’s shite, one has to admit one is some kind of “special” right wing nut-job ****-wit.

Do these leftie f***wits never actually read what has actually been written before boarding the outrage bus?

Easy now tiger….

I’d question the relevance of BJ even referring to BO’s ancestry e as having ANY relevance to the Brexit discussion. If, it is relevant then it’s fair to say we can question BJ’s ancestry too. Is he not after all, technically an American?…

Link
(Did he renounce it?)

My point being, I’ll restate, how is BO ancestry relative to Brexit & why did BJ feel necessary to refer to it?

I’m not outraged, rather amused – BJ should toddle off to join Farage the rate he’s going.

It is, IMHO, an own goal for BJ..

Here, quoted from the Graun, is what BJ said:

“Some said it was a snub to Britain. Some said it was a symbol of the part-Kenyan president’s ancestral dislike of the British empire – of which Churchill had been such a fervent defender” referring to the said removal of Churchills bust…

Which wasn’t removed just moved..

Link

I’d question the relevance of BJ even referring to BO’s ancestry e as having ANY relevance to the Brexit

He is using a story about the bust of Winston Churchill as the hook to bring you into the article and his arguments against EU membership, it is what good writers do. He is drawing no relevance from Obama’s ancestry to his Brexit argument – but it is relevant to the story because if you didn’t know his father was from Kenya, it would be difficult to understand why people could think he had antipathy to the empire.

BTW the actual article was in the Sun here.

it would be difficult to understand why people could think he had antipathy to the empire

other than the USA’s *fairly* well publisised break from a colonial British past?

other than the USA’s *fairly* well publisised break from a colonial British past?

But that wasn’t what the people who were pushing the story at the time were suggesting.

ninfan – Member

Referring to Churchill Bust: “Some said” – quite specifically Boris not saying it

You’re saying Boris doesn’t write his own column?

BJ seems to be infected by the tide of racism sweeping across the Eton party, with Beetroot Face joining in Goldsmith’s vile slurs on his mayoral rival.

it is what good writers do

Writers of fiction, which is what Bozo specialises in.

Boris is absolutely spot on. The US would never join a group like the EU, as he says they would never be bound by a non US court, they haven’t ratified numerous UN Treaties. They would never accept freedom of movement. Over his Presidency Obama has very deliberately and publically focused towards Asia, exactly what we should be doing. The US knows EU will be materially weakend without the UK with the risk of a collapse greatly increased when Greece defaults, that’s bad for the US so they want us to Remain, its our taxpayers who will help fund a bailout (via European Stability Fund) so no skin off their nose. Ditto foreign policy, the UK is much more closely aligned to US so they want us inside the EU to argue. Freedom of movement and a superior European court are “not their problem”

The US is a union of states who gave up almost ALL their powers to a central government.

@molgrips tell that to the Texans etc. US states retain lots of power including taxation, gun control and the death penalty for example. There are many who would like the power of the Federal bodies reduced.

not really comparing apples with apples there.. Boris is talking about the present establishment, not that of individual ‘states’ in a bygone era, so i think the comment is still very much valid.

It’s not, because the UK to USA comparison is not comparing apples with apples either.

@molgrips tell that to the Texans etc.

Not sure you’re going to get very far with that line of argument. US is more federal than Europe.

Think this article sums it up for me;

blogs.spectator.co.uk/2016/04/barack-obama-wants-boris-johnson-prefer-gutter

And with that cowardly sentence, filled with ‘some saids’ so he could sneak away from its implications, if needed – Johnson abandoned what few rights he possessed to be treated as a decent politician, journalist or man.

BJ seems to be infected by the tide of racism sweeping across the Eton party, with Beetroot Face joining in Goldsmith’s vile slurs on his mayoral rival.

This sort of remark is an attemt to intimidate. I can tell you on the Vote Leave stalls I help staff immigration/freedom of movement is one of fhe major issues people raise with us and the vast majority are working class Brits of varying ethnic backgrounds. Questions asked of Sadiq are what he should expect given his past meetings with people directly connected with extremist views. As the Charlie Ebdo editoral of a few weeks ago if you are acused of racism and intimidated for even asking a legitinate question then that is the sign of something far more sinister.

What does it mean when, upon hearing someone being accused of racism, you immediately assume it’s directed at you?

Boris has form for making stuff up to promote arguments especially about the EU . “some said” is in the absence of an attribution of the quote , simply an indicator of a” fact” or “opinion “that Boris has made up and a device for him to both say the thing and deny responsibility for it as Ninfan so helpfully illustrates.

Referring to Churchill Bust: “Some said” – quite specifically Boris not saying it

Do these leftie f***wits never actually read what has actually been written before boarding the outrage bus?

The comments are from BJ’s “newspaper” column, so yes Boris is quite specifically saying it.

Do these right-wing f***wits actually read what has actually been written before boarding the outrage bus?

I also believe that the Churchill bust was removed before Obama became president. Also, why should a national leader have a bust of another national leader in his office anyway?

Actual facts about the bust:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/fact-checker/wp/2015/01/27/ted-cruzs-claim-that-one-of-obamas-very-first-acts-was-returning-a-bust-of-churchill/

sorry to derail the outrage wagon.

it is what good writers do

I wouldn’t say a good writer because that trick will only work on those who already on the same page as Boris (pardon the pun!)

Boris Johnson is a truly vile human being, who will stoop to anything to fulfil his lust for power and money. The fact that he has inexplicably managed to camaflage this fact with his bumbling buffoon act is testimony to the limited mental capacity of those falling for the act.

Questions asked of Sadiq are what he should expect given his past meetings with people directly connected with extremist views. As the Charlie Ebdo editoral of a few weeks ago if you are acused of racism and intimidated for even asking a legitinate question then that is the sign of something far more sinister.

Not just bollocks, but utter and complete….

Theres something sinister afoot alright. But its not coming from Sadiq Khan….

The Tories’ attempts to smear Sadiq Khan are repellent

“Some said it was a snub to Britain. Some said it was a symbol of the part-Kenyan president’s ancestral…

On Wikipedia “some said” would get flagged as weasel words.

It’s a weird suggestion that Obama removed Churchill because he dislikes the UK because he has some sort of genetic or inherited grudge from his father’s Kenyan genes.

sorry to derail the outrage wagon.

Which outrage wagon would that be?….

There’s still a bust, just that the one (loaned by Blair in 2001) was returned as per protocol. One still remains (the one gifted in 1965).

Questions asked of Sadiq are what he should expect given his past meetings with people directly connected with extremist views

Questions have been asked and answers provided but Goldsmith continues to blow Lynton Cosby’s racist dog whistle.

Which outrage wagon would that be?….

those who felt Boris had made a good point about it.

How many outrage wagons are there in this thread?!

Lots of bollocks here

Starting (apparantly) with Boris’s BS, closely followed by Farage – both in the same mould
The our deputy chancelor weighing in with ‘dog-whistle racism” – WTF is that? Not relevant here, but nice lazy use of “racism”
Kate Hoey’s “patronising, insulting, hypocritical” attack followed by Paddy Pantsdowns equally nonsensical rebuttal on QT last night
Then a fine “one has to admit one is some kind of “special” right wing nut-job ****-wit.”

An excellent way to end the working week!

uestions have been asked and answers provided but Goldsmith continues to blow Lynton Cosby’s racist dog whistle.

“I think Sadiq Khan is using a smokescreen to hide the fact that he has associated with a lot of people who support terrorism and I think that does raise questions about his suitability to be mayor of London and especially when terrorism is such an imminent threat to the UK.

He has never denied that he has associated with these people and it’s also a fact that those people have supported terrorism.

Now the question is why, and on what basis, was Sadiq Khan associating with them.

And I think this is an area for legitimate scrutiny, it’s not Islamophobic or racist to ask questions and to ask Sadiq Khan to provide answers and it’s not.. he can’t hide behind these slogans of racism or Islamophobia.”

The above quote is from Atma Singh,Ken Livingston’s former aide and Labour Labour Party adviser.

It’s also worth noting that it was Sadiq Khan’s former aide Shueb Salar who claimed the brutal murder of Lee Rigby was fake, and that Khan himself was reported as recently as February to still be “following” ISIS / Daesh cheerleaders on Twitter (Majid Freeman and Hamja Ahsan).

And a bit of jamba bullying epic bantz to boot!

The original story written in 2009 is here.