Viewing 24 posts - 1 through 24 (of 24 total)
  • Boardman mtb pro 29er. Anyone got one?
  • cookci
    Free Member

    Hi

    Does anyone have the boardman mtb pro 29er 2016 version?

    Any good for XC?

    Thanks
    Christian

    andreasrhoen
    Free Member

    Don’t have this bike.

    What I like: 120 mm travel.
    120 mm … 130 mm is great.

    Spec looks good!
    2.2 Continental mountain king for XC o.k..
    If you like to use the bike also for trail biking a wider tire with more grip might be an option.
    Maybe check the frame information if you get wider tyres mounted.
    Rims: 19 mm inner bead? This would be a bit “old school”. But later upgrade to 25 mm always an option.

    Cheers!

    chakaping
    Free Member

    I had one for a while, it was good for XC riding yes. Didn’t race it though.

    I did upgrade a few bits, I wrote a review of the bike here…

    Review: Boardman Pro 29er

    matt_outandabout
    Full Member

    120 mm … 130 mm is great.

    Do go on.

    deanfbm
    Free Member

    Got one, it’s great.

    Stuck on a 30t steel ring, dropper (it has stealth routing), stuck a load of volume spacers in the forks and ghetto tubeless the wheels.

    Front end is a bit high so slammed the stem with a shorter headset top cap.

    Find it rides really well for xc. Tyres seem like a good compound, tubeless well, no problem with the narrow rims on xc.

    Can’t go wrong.

    richmtb
    Full Member

    I’ve got one. Very happy with it.

    I swapped the tyres to HRII and Ardent and converted the rims to tubeless. I ran it with a dropper for a while before this got put on another bike.

    Comes with a great fork and drivetrain. The Guide brakes are also excellent

    Great for XC and longer non technical rides. I also did the Glentress 7 on it.

    Got mine for £900. Total bargain!

    andreasrhoen
    Free Member

    120 mm … 130 mm is great.

    Do go on.

    @matt_outandabout:
    mmmhhh – quite picky…

    o.k. – let’s better say then:

    under 120 mm wouldn’t be sooo great!
    😉

    Really great, but more for AM hardtail: 150 mm or so.
    But the pro 29er is an XC bike!

    matt_outandabout
    Full Member

    But the pro 29er is an XC bike!

    Are you sure it isn’t an XC/trail lite bike?

    andreasrhoen
    Free Member

    @matt_outandabout:
    mmmhhh – quite picky…

    hahah

    an XC/trail lite bike

    Yes – but not a bad one – or?
    Not my dream bike for my biking style either.
    But

    XC/trail lite biking

    is also fun – or?

    😉

    matt_outandabout
    Full Member

    Damn, I am no good at this trolling malarkey.

    andrewy
    Full Member

    I’ve just bought the 2017 version. Took it to Bedgbury on Wednesday and promptly set loads of pb’s without trying, so I’m loving it. Fantastic value (especially at BC discount / sale price of £810) and fun to ride 😀

    andreasrhoen
    Free Member

    Congratulations!

    Good to hear.
    Winter sale is over soon…- good time to buy!

    Have fun!
    😉

    andrewy
    Full Member

    Thanks, I will 😀

    cookci
    Free Member

    We are all talking about the hardtail version arent we, not the FS?!

    The HT version defo has internal routing?

    I already have the fs pro… is there enough difference to justify the 2?!

    Thanks

    warpcow
    Free Member

    is there enough difference to justify the 2?!

    Well, there’s…

    andreasrhoen
    Free Member

    Mmmmhhh – you have the FS Pro….

    In this case….mmmhhhh: what’s about an 27.5 inch bike with 2.6 inch tyres or so and an HA of 65 deg? Or similar? In this case I would look for ‘long and slack’ with fat tyres.

    As playful fun bike.
    At least that’s what I would do.

    cookci
    Free Member

    Ha I already have a nukeproof scout 290 comp so i have the fun slack playful bike but its slow to pedal!

    My argument for this bike, is i would like an XC bike!

    That would give me 3 MTB’s… thats not too many right?!

    andreasrhoen
    Free Member

    Hey!
    Scout 290?

    Then you are set!
    You own the perfect combination of MTB bikes!!!

    Only option then for you:
    you need a fine carbon road race bike, 8kg or so….?????

    cookci
    Free Member

    I dont need any more road bikes lol

    andreasrhoen
    Free Member

    CycloCross?
    Gravel?

    (you will hate it….)

    andreasrhoen
    Free Member

    got it!
    Hurray!

    You still don’t have a FATBIKE …
    😯

    This… you will love!

    cookci
    Free Member

    I bought one anyway

    Weighs 12kg out the box for a medium.

    Does it really have a 68.5 degree head angle? It looks slacker than that i.e. identical to the fs pro which is advertised as 68.5 but is actually 67.5

    Anyway im happy with it, feels really modern geo wise and the fork locks out really well

    Do i fit the dropper cabling with the outer for most of it?

    Havent ridden it yet though as it takes me a week or so to get it helitaped etc first

    Caher
    Full Member

    I have. Best bike I’ve owned and I’ve had Kona’s and Speccys. I still have the silver 2015 version with no compelling reason to change it.

    monkeychild
    Free Member

    I have the 2015 version and it is a very capable bike. I don’t get time to MTB anymore so it hangs in the garage unloved.

Viewing 24 posts - 1 through 24 (of 24 total)

The topic ‘Boardman mtb pro 29er. Anyone got one?’ is closed to new replies.