None of the testing organisations are of any use except for insurance purposes- none of them tests with large boltcutters, which is the main tool used to break big locks. They say that they test with hacksaws, small croppers, pliars, hammers, lockpicks, and crowbars, and that these tools are used in most thefts. Which is absolutely true, but they’re all ineffective against quality locks- they’re only useful tools for thieves because so few bikes are locked up well. They chuck in a noisy attack usually with a small angle grinder, just because it gives a nice result but again, it’s not meaningful.
So, it’s a bit like saying “Most houses are broken into by chucking a brick through the window, therefore, we test all house security devices by throwing a brick at them. This front door lock proved brickproof, therefore we declare it Sold Secure Gold. What’s that? You opened it in 2 seconds with a screwdriver? Ah but most thieves use bricks so it doesn’t matter!”
It’s all bobbins. Thatcham were still approving locks with round keys even after companies were taking them off the shelves after the BIC-pen crack became well known.