Hi,
I’m consolidating my OnOne 456 and Surly Krampus down into one a single hardtail.
I had intended to go for a 29er, as at 6’3″, it seems the right size and I love my 29er full sus.
However, I am wondering whether I should consider a 650B+.
The main reason I initially discounted it was that although I love the 29+ Krampus’ wheels on a “for the fun of it” ride, I have always found they take more effort on smoother surfaces, especially uphill.
This “one bike” will be my main commuter machine. My commute is about 30k round trip, half road, one blooming massive tarmac into rocky bridleway hill (way home) and a downhill course in the morning. The Krampus is undeniably slow for this ride compared to my 29er FS because of its wheels… hence my plan to go with a 29er.
However, this bike will also be my bikepacking and local XC (mix of rocks and woods) rig.
Which leads me to wonder about B+.
Everywhere seems to say “B+ = faster”, but that is for trail riding. I’m wondering what its like on smoother stuff like roads, rocky bridleways etc.
Is it noticeably quicker than 29+ (I guess it might weigh a little less?)? Any experience from taller riders about B+ vs 29er? I believe that B+/2.8 is smaller by a noticable amount compared to a 29er?
Whether I get 29 or B+, I’ll be getting lightish Nextie carbon rims on Hope hubs (compared to the stock Krampus rims and Knards). I don’t feel that trying a cheap pair of B+ rims will help my decision, as they will probably weigh a tonne
For reference, the bikes I am considering include the Sonder Broken Road, Sonder Frontier, Cotic Solaris Max, Stanton Sherpa, Sonder Transmitter Carbon (if I went B+).
I’ll test ride any bike before buying it, but just wanting some thoughts to guide what I end up looking at (and trekking somewhere to test!)
Any thoughts / experience?
Thanks!