Well, I’m not planning on publishing this in Nature or anything, but there are no obvious biases. The bikes all tended to be ridden on the same trails (North-East Scotland XC bimbling) and the weather conditions will tend to average out. I don’t really favour a particular bike for a particular type of trail. In fact I quite enjoy riding things on inappropriate bikes, just for a laugh.
That’s probably why the average speeds are so close to each other. If one bike tended to get used on nicer days or smoother routes or something, the differences would probably be bigger.
As for effort, I basically like to ride up a hill as fast as I can whatever bike I’m on. It might not be that fast, but it’s usually as fast as I can manage.
There does seem to be a nice trend with tyre size: going from “normal” to plus drops the average by 0.3mph and then going to full-fat drops it by another 0.3mph. However, going from a hardtail to a full suss seems to incur a larger penalty than a fatter tyre and a 29er comes out a bit faster on average than a 26″ bike.
But, of course, this is all just average speed, which will be dominated by climbing speed. If all you care about is the time taken on the descents then this is irrelevant!