Well I supose that bashing the weather men is a bit of a national pastime but this year they seem to have been particularly bad. There was the barbeque summer of course that turned out to be another washout and earlier in the 'summer' we had a couple of days where severe weather warnings for heavy rain were given out, that turned out to be some of the best of the summer (the tourist industry wasn't happy as apparently a lot of folk stayed at home). Their strike rate since seems to have been dismal, not just a bit inaccurate but way off the mark.
So I suppose that I shouldn't be too suprised that after the weather report on the tv and the met office and BBC weather websites forcast good weather all day today, to find myself out on my bike under a thick, dark grey cloud bank that seemed almost to stretch from horizon to horizon (but not quite) in fairly heavy rain (it's still raining now after I've got back and looks set in for a while, while the websites are still forcasting good weather), it seems a fairly large feature to have missed. It doesn't seem any more inaccurate a forcast than many this summer, I'm just annoyed that I'm now wet rather than enjoying a sunny ride.
Is it me or does the forcasting seem to be getting worse, there hardly seems any point in bothering looking any more? Interestingly not long ago I read a book called "Isaac's Storm" relating to events in the early stages of the science of weather forcasting in the US. The procedure was forcast the weather then observe the actual weather, see what was different and adjust future forcasts accordingly. Does this sort of approach still go on or is it just a case of punching numbers into supercomputer models and reeling off the output (and assuming that that's as good as it gets)? The BBC seems more interested in sending its weather reporters of to Ascot to model hats than improving its reports.
Oh well, let's hope that the autumn is bright and crisp.