Hmmm
I've been thinking about this too. I'm about to buy a fs to replace my ti456. The only problem seems to be that most of the bikes that fall into the 140mm "do it all" catagory don't seem to have as slack a head tube "on paper" as I'm guessing the 456 has- and I do like the slack angle on the 456.
Oh well, I'm testing a bunch of bikes tomorrow so I can make my own mind up rather than what it looks like of paper.
One question, does anyone know if published(magazine reviews, company websites etc) angles are taken at rest unloaded or with sag applied? If unloaded I guess the head angle of the FS will be slacker in action as the back end squats down a bit. Conversely a hardtail will steepen a bit. All conjecture mind.