I read his book & it didn’t diminish my distrust of him at all – then again, I’m of the Nicholas Roche school of thought mentioned above. For him to have the UCI Presidency I would expect him to have to come clean with he whole truth at the point he was caught.
Has he shown remorse – yes.
Has he told the whole truth since being caught – no.
Has he disassociated himself from other known dopers – no.
Would he have confessed if they hadn’t caught him – unlikely.
Has he damaged the sport he ‘loves’ – yes.
Has he continued to earn a considerable sum since returning – probably.
IMHO, the penalties for doping are too lenient and, as such, are not a sufficient deterrent. If Millar (or any other drugs cheat) had been told he had a 10 year ban but it can be reduced in stages by naming other doping riders, team officials & doctors involved maybe, just maybe, the sport would’ve got cleaner, quicker.