So office banter led to someone saying that bedding sisters would be the ideal sceanrio. I pointed out that would be incest and properly weird and have basically been shouted down.
Thoughts - would you or do you reckon it's yuk?
I appreciate that this place being what it is, this thread is not going to live long.
I've seen several documentaries about this sort of thing on the internet and everyone seems to enjoy it, so it can't be a bad thing to do.
Are we talking bedding your own sisters, which I would actually consider to be incest? 
I wouldn't have generally thought that people made conscious decisions to deploy ethical thought when conjuring the types of fantasies you are referring to.
Yuk, assuming you're referring to a manage a trois.
A colleague teaches a module which a section about disgust and got a debate started yesterday about what was worse - incest or beastiality. All the lads in the class reckoned given the option they'd rather shag an animal than their mum or sister. The lasses, however, simply refused to think about either option.
I'm sure he never meant his sisters, however I might be wrong.
Big bottle of baby oil + sisters = happy days.
Don't they mean bedding their girlfriend and subsequently the girlfriend's sister, not bedding their own biological sister?
I hope you have got your fingers crossed or live in Norfolk.
The same guy thinks the whole mother daughter thing is all good too.
I'm working with mervs.
The sceanrio was bedding both sisters at the same time in a fully interactive way.
Well, sleeping with one of your sisters is incest, so I don't see how increasing the quantity makes it somehow OK.
Anyway, surely the ideal scenario involves the Swedish beach volleyball team and a small poached tofu?
Quite and a menage a trois is no problem it's the sisters bit...
Big bottle of baby oil + sister = happy days.
Quite and a menage a trois is no problem it's the sisters bit...
Guess it's not really incest as they're not necessarily "together" in the operation, despite both being present. If they were, however, it'd be a bit odd. And if they weren't it would be a bit odd. Can't say I've ever considered it.
A small poached tofu?
Like, WTF man? Seriously?
Had crushes and fantasies about a GF's mum and sister, but the reality, well, that's just a bit messed up tbh.
The sister on sister bit would not be to my taste. If that's what you mean by fully interactive.
So if you went out with a lady for a while, split up, and then at some future point went out with her sister, that would be moraly wrong?
by the way what's a merv?
The sceanrio was bedding both sisters at the same time in a fully interactive way.
If not then it would be down to whether the sisters touched each other, which would be odd.
I do know a father and son who often bed mothers and daughters they meet and do same room stuff - it is their ongoing 'thing'. But as far as I am aware, they never get involved in same-family action directly.
It's OK elfin, you're thinking of the Tofu - comedy bird, with a big orange beak and blue feathers that goes SQUAAAAAARK. Easily confused, as they are delicious when poached. I'm thinking of the other Tofu.
Anyway, your girlfriends mum is also her sister? That's way more messed up.
Are we talking bedding your own sisters, which I would actually consider!to be incest?
I'm glad you edited that Don.
You must log in to post.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
