Ads are strange things.. take the flash controversy. There’s been many threads on here from people complaining about them and questioning whether by being annoying they can possibly work at all as a successful marketing tool – and yet the more and ad is complained about the more it is clicked on. This is true. ten years of looking at the numbers has taught me that the ads complained about most work the best, by a long way. I agree that this is a little sad but it’s a fascinating insight into our own psyche really as consumers. If surveyed, most people (mostly men actually) state they take little notice of advertising and that advertising has little effect on their buying choices – which totally flies against all the measured research into the effectiveness of advertising.
Take other flash ads that frequent our site.. often the words, ‘annoying’, ‘flashy’, ‘irritating’ ‘arrgh!’, ‘make them stop!’, ‘I ignore them’, ‘I’ll not be buying from them…’ type responses are common. But then I look into our stats in the back end and guess which ads are clicked on more than any others… by an awful long way. From an advertisers POV the less obtrusive they make their ads the less effective they are.
Those Go Compare ads on the tellybox… Do you think anyone at all finds them anything but irritating? The people who produce them probably hate them just as much if not more.. But when asked to name car insurance comparison websites most people will put that brand high on their list of responses.
The psychology of advertising is truly fascinating.
Premier users get to switch off the majority of the advertising on this site anyway and Jon’s now added the words ‘Advertorial’ into the description of that story on the front page just to make it clearer for all.