Home Forums Chat Forum Ukraine

Viewing 40 posts - 7,161 through 7,200 (of 20,612 total)
  • Ukraine
  • blokeuptheroad
    Full Member

    Just a note on White Phosphorus.  All armies, including the British Army use it.  It’s primary use is for producing a near instantaneous smoke screen.  It is not against the laws of armed conflict to use it as a smoke munition. It clearly is however, when used in an anti personnel role.

    It’s horrible stuff, I have personal experience of it and I am absolutely not condoning it, but just clarifying a possible misconception that it’s mere possession or use is automatically a war crime when that isn’t the case.

    binners
    Full Member

    I did, its looking like Russia have killed hundreds in weeks

    Given the nature of the footage emerging of cities reduced to rubble by absolutely indiscriminate heavy artillery, cruise missiles and airstrikes I think it’s hopelessly naive to think the deaths will be in mere hundreds.

    And more importantly, what’s glaringly obvious is the Russians don’t give a shit how many people they kill.

    natrix
    Free Member

    700 applications have been approved out of 32,000 made

    And a lot of those approved applications will be unusable, the Ukranian family that I know of (mum & two primary school age children) have had the chidren’s visa’s approved, but not the mum, i.e. completely useless as they can’t realistically travel without their mum………

    johndoh
    Free Member

    This is going way off thread, but it is really important to draw a distinction between isolated incidents in Iraq v the Ukraine War.

    Agreed

    Just a note on White Phosphorus. All armies, including the British Army use it. It’s primary use is for producing a near instantaneous smoke screen. It is not against the laws of armed conflict to use it as a smoke munition. It clearly is however, when used in an anti personnel role.

    It’s horrible stuff, I have personal experience of it and I am absolutely not condoning it, but just clarifying a possible misconception that it’s mere possession or use is automatically a war crime when that isn’t the case.

    Also agreed, however the use of it in Fallujah was reportedly used in civilian areas.

    The whole of Fallujah was technically a civilian area. They used it to flush people out of buildings without differentiating between combatants & non-combatants.

    blokeuptheroad
    Full Member

    The whole of Fallujah was technically a civilian area. They used it to flush people out of buildings without differentiating between combatants & non-combatants

    Illegal and immoral, no doubt. Even if there were only combatants present it would still be illegal to deliberately fire WP at them.

    Yeah, i think that’s what was decided, but somehow not much was done after the fact.

    Standard shrug of the shoulders and something muttered about operational necessity.

    gofasterstripes
    Free Member

    All of which deserves investigation…

    On the other hand, that and other charges laid make not a jot of difference to the morality (or clear lack thereof) of the actions of the Russian military at this time.

    Plus, they invaded so they have a serious morality defacit to start with.

    Word. And I wonder how much of the Russian military’s actions in this regard has been directed by the Kremlin. Not that it absolves anyone of any culpability, it simply increases the number who are; makes them state endorsed war crimes.

    Sadly I think Vlad is fully aware and in control of civilians ending up in mass graves with a round to the back of the head.

    ransos
    Free Member

    I remember chilling testimony on the World at War, from German women describing the actions of the Red Army in 1945. It would seem not much has changed.

    deadlydarcy
    Free Member

    Anastasiia Lapatina is reporting that Mariupol Council has said Russians have started using their mobile crematoria. Don’t know if I want this to be fake news or not. Fear for the civilian casualty numbers, but even more that Russia is finding a way to “disappear” them. If the bodies aren’t found, they’ll just deny, deny, deny. Jeez.

    rickmeister
    Full Member
    CountZero
    Full Member

    Russians have started using their mobile crematoria

    I think those consist of a pile of vehicle tyres and a can of petrol…

    spekkie
    Free Member

    I guess someone got bollocked for leaving evidence (dead bodies) laying around and they don’t want the same to happen again.

    Grim.

    pondo
    Full Member

    I would love it – love it – if the Ukrainians chase the Russians fleeing Kyiv back into the mother******land, curl round to the south east and cut off the Russian forces in the east. Never gonna happen, but please, God, please…

    Caher
    Full Member

    Some little old lady on the news tonight, who lived through the WW 2, likened the Russian occupation as very similar to the Nazis except they spoke Russian.

    thols2
    Full Member

    Given the nature of the footage emerging of cities reduced to rubble by absolutely indiscriminate heavy artillery, cruise missiles and airstrikes I think it’s hopelessly naive to think the deaths will be in mere hundreds.

    And more importantly, what’s glaringly obvious is the Russians don’t give a shit how many people they kill.

    Exactly. I would be surprised if the Ukrainian civilian death toll wasn’t in the tens of thousands, there is no way on earth that it’s only going to be in the hundreds.

    And, this is deliberate on the part of Russia. Fighting in a city will always be brutal and a lot of civilians will be killed because the defending forces are dispersed among civilians. What Russia is doing goes beyond just trying to eliminate the defending forces, they have a deliberate policy of genocide against the Ukrainian civilians. That’s an order of magnitude worse than anything the U.S. has done since Vietnam.

    thols2
    Full Member

    Ok, so scholars are having a debate about whether it should be called “genocide” or merely “atrocity crimes”. That should make for excellent panel discussions at academic conferences.

    Northwind
    Full Member

    On the subject of visas for ukrainians, the “government”‘s response to the recent petition predictably plays the “russians will sneak in” card which we’re supposed to be terrified of even though they basically hugged russian spies and kleptocrats on arrival…

    But amazingly, it also says “Visas provide clarity and stability to an individual having moved from another country following horrific events” and “For the individual, a visa can help provide them with a better understanding on what they can do in the UK in terms of employment and how long they can stay for.” and best of all, “The Windrush Lessons Learned Review underlined the importance of providing individuals with clear evidence of their immigration status – lots of people were not adequately documented and this caused problems for both them and their dependents later down the line.”

    That’s right kids, the hostile environment and all that comes with it and the system that’s cunningly pretended to welcome ukrainians while putting up hidden barriers, is all for their good! They’ll benefit from the clarity, the understanding, and the better documentation! Really it’d be immoral not to have all these crushing visa requirements and it’s everyone else in europe that’s the scumbags.

    thols2
    Full Member

    My take on this is that the U.S. is making it clear to Russia that the U.S. can escalate if Russia escalates. So far, the equipment that NATO has supplied has been fairly simple defensive stuff that requires little training or Eastern Bloc stuff that Ukraine is already familiar with. By officially confirming that Ukrainian soldiers are in the U.S. being trained on new weapons, they are sending a message that the U.S. can respond to Russian escalation by supplying more sophisticated weapons.

    piemonster
    Free Member

    Exactly. I would be surprised if the Ukrainian civilian death toll wasn’t in the tens of thousands, there is no way on earth that it’s only going to be in the hundreds.

    That’s pretty much where I’m at.

    Apologies for getting drawn into yet another “whattabout them” deflection.

    Should have just pointed out the thread title and moved on.

    nickc
    Full Member

    By any measure, this is very funny…

    piemonster
    Free Member

    So far, the equipment that NATO has supplied has been fairly simple defensive stuff that requires little training or Eastern Bloc stuff that Ukraine is already familiar with.

    I saw this yesterday, although from the same root source and nowhere else.

    And takes me back to Ukraine being “neutral” as a part of peace talks. I just cant see how that’s going to be achieved on anything other than a piece of paper that says “were not aligned with NATO, honest guv” How the hell is Ukraine going to be anything other than an opponent to Russia after this?

    Do the Balkans may provide some ideas as to how diplomatic relations will pan out!?

    nickc
    Full Member

    There’s only so bad you can be.

    I very much hope you’re right, but given that we’ve no idea at all what’s going on on the font lines of this war, and the clear casual disregard that Russians forces have for civilians lives combined with the fact that they frequently use both WP and DU rounds (that caused the birth defects in Iraq subsequently) makes me think you might want to wait before making pronouncements like that.

    piemonster
    Free Member

    By any measure, this is very funny…

    I’m enjoying the responses to that tweet.

    BruceWee
    Free Member

    By any measure, this is very funny…

    That moment when you realise that, what you thought was a parody account, was in fact the real account all along…

    MoreCashThanDash
    Full Member

    That’s right kids, the hostile environment and all that comes with it and the system that’s cunningly pretended to welcome ukrainians while putting up hidden barriers, is all for their good!

    FFS, get them into the UK, even just into holding centres, and then we can sort out the paperwork. I’m ashamed to work for this government – suspect it’s a factor in my mental health.

    greyspoke
    Free Member

    Ok, so scholars are having a debate about whether it should be called “genocide” or merely “atrocity crimes”. That should make for excellent panel discussions at academic conferences.

    There are extensive definitions in international law. So the discussion is essentially the one the prosecution team will have as to what the correct charges are. As more facts become known, the position will become clearer.

    I detect a sneer in your tone @thols2, which is disappointing. The things being discussed are not of purely academic interest. They relate to the process of prosecution that will (we hope) eventually take place. Historically, academia has been deeply involved in developing doctrine in this area and in supplying the manpower to get the system up and running, more so than in many other areas of law.

    thols2
    Full Member

    I detect a sneer in your tone thols2, which is disappointing. The things being discussed are not of purely academic interest. They relate to the process of prosecution that will (we hope) eventually take place.

    Well, Putin and other Russians have publicly said they do not recognize Ukraine as a real country and they aim to destroy it and exterminate anyone who resists. Then they sent tens of thousands of soldiers in and did exactly what they said they were going to do (which is genocide.) Now we have a scholarly debate about whether it’s genocide, despite Putin saying that’s what he was going to do and sending in troops and doing it. I really don’t think there’s any doubt about this one, it’s genocide, just like Putin bragged about.

    MoreCashThanDash
    Full Member

    I really don’t think there’s any doubt about this one, it’s genocide, just like Putin bragged about.

    I agree with you entirely but what we think doesn’t matter – it’s down to the legal experts and scholars to make sure no one avoids a conviction due to a technicality.

    nickc
    Full Member

    I think it would be difficult imagining our politicians being so candid

    gofasterstripes
    Free Member

    The wheels of justice turn slowly, but they grind exceedingly fine….

    Definitely defined means it might stick.

    Now, we just need someone with a very long shephard’s hook to get ahold of him

    piemonster
    Free Member

    First question soldiers, then shoot them

    https://www.welt.de/politik/ausland/article238035659/Ukraine-Krieg-im-Liveticker-Russische-Soldaten-besprachen-Graeueltaten-offenbar-ueber-Funk.html

    Welt report claiming intelligence sourced from the German Federal Intelligence Service

    You’ll need Chrome or similar to translate

    molgrips
    Free Member

    I’m ashamed to work for this government

    You don’t work for them you work for us (thanks). They are just your bad bosses.

    greyspoke
    Free Member

    I believe that technically civil servants are servants of the Crown, just as Government ministers are (when being ministers not MPs of course).

    shermer75
    Free Member

    By any measure, this is very funny…

    This is just priceless!!

    shermer75
    Free Member

    TheBrick
    Free Member

    May have already been pointed out but having read a few reports I wonder if at some point the Russian line will change to:

    All male Ukrainians are being called into the army therefore all male Ukrainians are valid millarty targets. Male Ukrainians were using civilians (the rest of their families they live with) as human shields therefore it was hard to to have some civilian deaths.

    zippykona
    Full Member

    Or conscripting all Ukrainians into the Russian army and those that don’t turn up are shot as deserters.

    piha
    Free Member

    Interesting…….

Viewing 40 posts - 7,161 through 7,200 (of 20,612 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.