Viewing 36 posts - 681 through 716 (of 716 total)
  • Retirees to the forum.
  • surfer
    Free Member

    Don’t forget that there’s always the chance of a relatively short but steep increase in spending at the end if you end up in care, but that’s a risk rather than a given

    But you only pay for that if you have the money. My mum has lived for years with dementia. Her quality of life is zero and has been for several years. She has sold her home and spent all of her savings, (minus circa £23k whereby the care home charges stop and the LA then starts to pay) to cover her care costs. Whatever money you have will be spent very quickly at several thousand per month, even for a non luxurious care home.

    mattyfez
    Full Member

    Whatever money you have will be spent very quickly at several thousand per month

    Yup, My nan died just after chrismas, she was in care for about a month after hospital discharge… £900 per week…it’s a staggaring amount of money.

    tjagain
    Full Member

    Mattyfez – and suprisingly not very profitable  £900 per week per patient will barely make a profit – and self funders are often used to subsidise state funded where the £500 or so a week is less than costs

    intheborders
    Free Member

    Yup, My nan died just after chrismas, she was in care for about a month after hospital discharge… £900 per week…it’s a staggaring amount of money.

    Compared to what?

    Works out at £5.36 per hour, all in.

    mattyfez
    Full Member

    I wasn’t commenting on value for money or not, I was commenting that it’s a vast amount of money.

    thegeneralist
    Free Member

    Compared to what?

    What a doofus question. Compare to living at home/ kids house/ wherever she was living beforehand plus shopping costs, heating and services.

    intheborders
    Free Member

    Compare to living at home/ kids house/ wherever she was living beforehand plus shopping costs, heating and services.

    But she’s now being cared for, so not really comparable.

    I was commenting that it’s a vast amount of money.

    It’s not really, maybe it was once (60’s maybe), but not anymore.

    tjagain
    Full Member

    Oh nursing home can be a huge cost.   £1000+ per week is not uncommon.

    gordimhor
    Full Member

    Maybe I can put this in some kind of perspective as a care worker my entire annual wage just under £20000 would not pay for 5 months care for my mum at approximately £1200 per week

    tjagain
    Full Member

    Thread drift alert.  15years ish ago I did a business plan for a care home – I wanted my own.  Staffing at halfway decent terms and conditions to the minimum standards required would mean around £300 – 400 a week per bed.  Equipment costs are ridiculous – a therapeutic bath can cost £10 000!  A simple hoist £1000+

    At today’s cost I guesstimate the total cost per bed per week is around £700 – 800 for basic care.  Add some frills and that goes up.  Add in some vacancies and then any chance of a profit is gone

    CountZero
    Full Member

    Getting away from care home costs, now I’m retired, and not constrained by working hours or shifts, I’ve recently taken a three day beginners course in archery, which I passed, got a signed certificate and everyfing! I’ve now joined my local club, (which wasn’t cheap), and I’ll be taking coaching lessons with a club bow and other equipment, until I can get to the nearest shop, which is Wales Archery, in Caldecot.
    It was made clear that online purchases are to be avoided, due to the uncertain quality of the equipment, which can cause injuries, like a bow limb fracturing under stress!
    Also, it’s really recommended that the bow be set up to fit the owner, a bit like a bike, really, so that’s an expense to look forward to.

    The club has access to indoor facilities, so I can carry on through the winter, which I hadn’t thought about, which will get me out of the house. 😎

    blackhat
    Free Member

    4% rule was somewhat undermined by the low interest rate environment but might just be coming back into relevance as interest rates “normalise”.  My financial planner friend endorses the following rule of thumb: subtract your age from 100 and divide that number into your pot of money as an approximation of what you can pretty safely draw without running out of money.  ie at age 60 you can take 2.5% of your pot safely etc.

    frankconway
    Full Member

    CZ – do you dislike any of your neighbours?

    iainc
    Full Member

    My financial planner friend endorses the following rule of thumb: subtract your age from 100 and divide that number into your pot of money as an approximation of what you can pretty safely draw without running out of money.  ie at age 60 you can take 2.5% of your pot safely etc.

    really, I can’t see the logic there.  This assumes you live from 60 to 100 (v unlikely) and you withdraw a 40th every year, during each those 40 years, during which there is no growth to the pot from the figure in it at age 60 (again v unlikely)

    julians
    Free Member

    My financial planner friend endorses the following rule of thumb: subtract your age from 100 and divide that number into your pot of money as an approximation of what you can pretty safely draw without running out of money. ie at age 60 you can take 2.5% of your pot safely etc.

    thats a super cautious approach, cant see me following that advice, but to each their own, everyones attitude to risk is different

    intheborders
    Free Member

    really, I can’t see the logic there.  This assumes you live from 60 to 100 (v unlikely) and you withdraw a 40th every year, during each those 40 years, during which there is no growth to the pot from the figure in it at age 60 (again v unlikely)

    And based on watching grandparents/parents etc the money needed does reduce over time, and you ain’t taking it with you.

    blackhat
    Free Member

    It’s a rule of thumb – it’s to help those trying to picture how much they might realistically draw without finding themselves destitute with years of life ahead of them.  It should also help mitigate the risks from sequencing issues but it isn’t a hard and fast rule.  And when you think about it doesn’t imply taking 2.5% of the original pot each and every year.  My financial planner friend’s client list is concentrated on finance professionals at the top end, so he gets a hearing from those who might have half an idea what’s going on.  He also pointed me to a book titled “Beyond the 4% Rule”, which I would recommend.  It explores a range of methods of deciding how much you want to draw each year.  I need to re-read it but I got to a number of 2.75% initial draw, rising with inflation, unless my pot had had a very poor previous year.

    surfer
    Free Member

    This assumes you live from 60 to 100

    Also assumes you will spend the same amount in your hundredth year as your sixtieth!

    blackhat
    Free Member

    Financial planners often assume a “smile” profile on spending – higher expenditure in the first years of retirement as you do more travelling and treats while you’re fit enough, a settling down phase and then a ramp up towards the end when care needs are higher.  In the end, for all the analysis and planning you do, s**t happens, so you can only think in broad brush terms.

    FB-ATB
    Full Member

    online purchases are to be avoided

    deffo- when Mrs FB got her archery instructor permit to use at scouts we went to a LAS to get her bow-probably spent close to 4hrs choosing & tweaking equipment. They had their own range so could test & try after all the set up & while the arrows were being made.

    They also had ye olde yew longbows. After I was admiring them, they let me have a go with one.

    gravedigger
    Free Member

    The 4% rule is based on investing in US stock, so a UK or even global investment portfolio will yield different results – for a UK dominant portfolio the percentage is more like 3.1%. And it also assumes the usual 60/40 portfolio.

    You can improve on this rate by employing some additional strategies, described very fully in the book “Living off your Money” : https://amzn.eu/d/5JQLJcS

    Regarding seeing an IFA, they are probably using a cashflow tool, like Voyant Go.

    Although this software is not normally publically accessible you can get access by joining the Meaningful Academy website, which is a significant, but one-off, fee of £695, but you get the first years access to a single user version of Voyant Go, and can then retain access at £120 p.a. You also get some training modules on how to use it and also on the way this IFA advies his clients to manage their money – basically partitioning money into buckets of risk vs time.

    You can model inflation, investment returns, events like downsizing your house, taxes, etc.

    You can find videos on youtube describing the software.

    footflaps
    Full Member

    which is a significant, but one-off, fee of £695

    Someone must have written an open source version…

    DrJ
    Full Member

    Regarding seeing an IFA, they are probably using a cashflow tool, like Voyant Go.

    Maybe similar concept to this, which is free 🙂

    gravedigger
    Free Member

    Not looked at this properly but this guy on youtube also has a spreadsheet : https://youtu.be/T494TnOD9sE?si=bHeJEFP5tI09UH1B

    The is also RetireEasy whch is cheaper : https://www.retireeasy.co.uk/

    And EvolveMyRetirement, whcih can run Monte Carlo on you investment plans https://evolvemyretirement.com/

    I don’t think any are as flexible as Voyant.

    ton
    Full Member

    if i had taken advice or gone into calling it a day, like some of you guys seem to want to, i would have still been working…………..  lol

    @lessmoneymoretime

    olddog
    Full Member

    if i had taken advice or gone into calling it a day, like some of you guys seem to want to, i would have still been working…………..  lol

    @lessmoneymoretime

    Very much this.

    alpin
    Free Member

    Money is the replaceable, time isn’t.

    As such the GF and I sold everything last year and now bum around in a van. It’s a nice van. Kinda semi-retired. GF has a few clients and can work remotely. I’ve done basic tools with me and in theory could do some odd jobs. Otherwise I get the occasional bit of corporate work building various sets around Europe which pays quite well.

    Figured we would rather enjoy our time and health whilst we are still fit and young enough to do so rather than working just pay rent in a place neither of us really wanted to be.

    My mum died at 68. My old man quit work at 64 with a great pension, but sadly his health (lungs) are screwed. He had three or four years of golf and social life before being more or less house bound.

    GF’s folks are socially active, but no longer particularly nimble on their feet.

    Seems like a bit of a waste.

    We figured, with the way things are going, that we’ll be expected to still be working into our 70s before state pension kicks in.

    I’ve been outside of the UK for over 15 years now and as such (as far as I understand it) am not eligible to pay capital gains tax.

    I’ve 260k (Was over 350k pre-covid 😔) in various funds. Just over half of it is in SIPP and ISA, which I can no longer pay into due to being outside of the UK for so long. The rest is in a Hargreaves Fund&Share account. I’m 40 now.

    Probably need to get some decent advice regarding the capital gains thing and whether the SIPP and ISA are tax free. We’re currently officially of no fixed abode.

    Both of us are likely to inherit a decent chunk once or respective folks pop their clogs.

    Don’t really know what I’m saying other than time is not replaceable, money is.

    5lab
    Full Member

    Do you have any assets that might be liable for capital gains? If you withdraw it slowly (as a British tax resident, not sure if it’s the same for overseas), you get something like £6k per year of gains tax free, so if your money doubled you can get 12k per year out

    alpin
    Free Member

    Only assets I have is the money in HL and then the van plus tools. Never told Germany about the cash as there you pay 6% tax on any yearly gains regardless as to whether you take money out or not.

    Really not sure what the deal would be if I were to buy a house somewhere in say Italy or France.

    As it stands I’m not registered anywhere for tax purposes.

    gravedigger
    Free Member

    That guy on youtube linked to above (with the spreadsheet) has a link to an advice channel – go to his About page on YT and the link is at the bottom.

    Chris Boourne provides lots of videos talking about tax concerns on pensions and investments, might be worth reviewing.

    https://www.youtube.com/@chrisbourne-taxfreeinvesti9688/about

    mattyfez
    Full Member

    As it stands I’m not registered anywhere for tax purposes.

    In Spain if you spend more than 183 day you are considered resident for taxation purposes. Whether you tell them or if they catch you is a different subject but you do become liable.

    julians
    Free Member

    Alpin – presumably if you’re not paying any tax (by virtue of not being tax resident anywhere) theb you’re not 9aying any national insurance anywhere either,so will not be able to claim full state pension when you get to that point in life?

    Just something to consider, I obviously don’t know your full circumstances so you may have it all under control

    alpin
    Free Member

    @julians correct…. Although being self employed in Germany for 15  +years I never opted to pay into their system. Investment is high and returns a joke*. My accountant advised me to keep shuffling money into private funds (which I’ve done) and ignore the German system.

    However, I’ve only paid UK NI for nine years, having left the UK aged 25. You need ten years contribution to get the basic UK pension. I’ve been outside the UK for too long to voluntarily make up the difference. Was planning to register myself as resident in the UK and pay one years NI, but having learnt about the CGT exemption I’ve decided to wait until I’ve drawn a decent lump sum. I’ve got until age 66 to re-register in the UK and pay the remaining year’s NI.

    *GF has 13 years contribution as is currently due 48€/month.

    Kryton57
    Full Member

    GSitting here musing, I can’t help thinking I’ve got this incredibly wrong and the “dream” of an early retirement is nothing but a faux passage of entitled thinking toward a false dawn of a happier life.

    Visting carribean family, part of a conversation was of our Aunt who 2 years after the passing of her husband told us she’s decided to leave the family business (pottery & urns) for her siblings to manage.  Shes 78.    She supplemented this with how happy our uncle – and she – was to have always been involved in the business. She owns her small wooden Caribbean house and a 42inch TV and a modest car, and asks for nothing more than money from the business to pay her utilities, food and a once every two year cruise joining her sons family who live in the US.

    So why aim at numbers like 60, 67 or earlier, isn’t this really about creating a more happy environment within which to live and work before deciding the time is right to drop the work bit?

    Speaking for myself, I’m kinda thinking now that upon the mortgage settlement in 12 months that I should seek an exit from my stressful corporate job and really find something I enjoy turning up for daily – although I’ve no idea what that is yet – until I finally decide to quit, rather than aiming at age or financially defined exit. 🤷‍♂️

    doris5000
    Full Member

    Speaking for myself, I’m kinda thinking now that upon the mortgage settlement in 12 months that I should seek an exit from my stressful corporate job and really find something I enjoy turning up for daily

    Good luck!

    A good mate of mine is a builder. He loves his work, but he’s under no illusions that he could carry on in the same way to 78.

    We periodically see threads on here like “I’m fed up of my fancy job in X, I want to retrain, downsize, get into something I’d enjoy, like cabinetmaking/forestry/dogwalking/etc”. I often wonder how those stories panned out.

    Personally I tried ‘doing what I love’ (being a musician/DJ/producer) in my 20’s and early 30’s. It was a lot of fun but the stress of self-employment and low income got pretty hard. Which is why I now think about retirement dates, so I can get back to doing music again, but with a financial safety net!

    I don’t really dislike my current job. But equally I’ve no great wish to carry it on longer than I really need to.

    Kryton57
    Full Member

    I don’t really dislike my current job. But equally I’ve no great wish to carry it on longer than I really need to.

    This is the crux for me.  I don’t dislike it so much per se and it’s well paid role with a decent pension contribution at 8%, but I think I moan / make too much of it and the politics that I drag myself down.  I also think the corporate / UK expectation that you “must” work “more” than your contracted to means that sometimes it’s not always easy to find role that allows you and your employer to accept you to happily cruise along meeting an average set of expectations within your comfort zone.

    If I could find a job that allowed the latter after next year I think I’d be in a better mental place for sure.

Viewing 36 posts - 681 through 716 (of 716 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.