This is another one of those posts I need to write just to get other peoples views of the carbon/steel pros/cons debate.
Scenario. Having realised I can’t cut it in the upper echelons of vets road racing, I’d already decided to just race circuit races at my local venue, maybe one or two forays into open road racing. I’m not racing this year BTW. So actual racing will be perhaps 13 circuit races a year and maybe one road race (re starting next year)
So the frames. I get a very good deal on Giants, I was going to buy a Defy Advanced SL with the ISP.
What I actually really really like are Colnago Masters and a few other new breed steel race bikes.
The Defy is technically a better frame, my head knows that.
The steel is ‘nicer’ and will bring pleasure even when I don’t race, as would the Defy.
This head over heart.
So I want the steel, but I know the Defy would be far lighter, climb and sprint better that’s what evolution has done. But how much better, enough to regret buying steel?
I’m not after a retro steel bike, it would be SRAM (which I have) a set of 1400g standard profile wheels and top end Deda finishing kit.
Watching city centre racing is encouraging with steel frames quite often at the fore, and that’s just a super fast version of the worst I’d be doing.