Community

Forum menu
Most Overrated Band...
 

[Closed] Most Overrated Band(s) ?

Posts: 0
Free Member
Topic starter
 

And why?

...

My vote goes to,

Radiohead - Refreshingly different but far too cerebral and "moaney"

Cream - Bad rip-offs of classic old blues songs, all guitar no rhythm

Pink Floyd - Unmusical, dull, wallowing, pretentious 'sound'

That should ruffle a few feathers, now, post your own


 
Posted : 27/12/2009 11:58 pm
Posts: 31075
Free Member
 

Not a particular fan of either Cream or PF but I still wouldn't say they were overrated. You're wrong about Radiohead though.

Overrated? Hmmm...Hearsay, Jedward, JLS, Same Difference


 
Posted : 28/12/2009 12:00 am
Posts: 13809
Full Member
 

Elbow


 
Posted : 28/12/2009 12:00 am
 ojom
Posts: 177
Free Member
 

radiohead aren't cerebral, they are too GCSE poetry.

Oasis. totally and utterly over-rated.


 
Posted : 28/12/2009 12:02 am
Posts: 30656
Free Member
 

The Beatles because they are shite.


 
Posted : 28/12/2009 12:03 am
Posts: 10194
Full Member
 

the beatles, oasis, coldplay, U2,metallica


 
Posted : 28/12/2009 12:08 am
Posts: 2877
Free Member
 

Oasis +100


 
Posted : 28/12/2009 12:08 am
Posts: 2261
Full Member
 

Pink Floyd - Unmusical, dull, wallowing, pretentious 'sound'

You're having a laugh aint ya??

**Feathers ruffled**


 
Posted : 28/12/2009 12:12 am
Posts: 21
Free Member
 

Bob Dylan - only because I don't like him at all.
Smiths/Morrisey - again - as above but at least he can sing - unlike Dylan.


 
Posted : 28/12/2009 12:21 am
 jedi
Posts: 10249
Full Member
 

paul macartney=caravan entertainer


 
Posted : 28/12/2009 12:24 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

never got the slavish devotion awarded to the Clash.
Darkness were one trick ponies
As for Van Morrison, yeah he can sing but name me 10 good songs by him not including Gloria, Brown eyed bleedin girl, moondance or here comes the night.


 
Posted : 28/12/2009 12:30 am
Posts: 33902
Full Member
 

Cream, all guitar and no rhythm, excuse me? Ginger Baker is an excellent drummer and Jack Bruce a damn fine bass player, which makes a a three-piece band two-thirds rhythm section. Or don't you do maths?
And the Beatles? Well, whether you like them or not doesn't alter the fact they were [b]not[/b] ‘shite', they altered the face of popular music from Tin Pan Alley sourced songs given to any singer with a good voice, kinda like X-Factor winners, in fact, to bands and singers who actually wrote their own material. Calling them shite shows a breathtaking level of ignorance of musical history. Go back to yer Will Young records and leave the proper music to the grownups.


 
Posted : 28/12/2009 12:50 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

The Beatles, reason, shite.


 
Posted : 28/12/2009 12:51 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Yes
Michael Jackson
Madonna
Mozart
Nickelback

Cream? Jees you've lost it.

"Hey there baby, get into my big black car, I wanna just show ya what my politics are!"


 
Posted : 28/12/2009 12:53 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

I'd go with Pink Floyd


 
Posted : 28/12/2009 12:59 am
Posts: 10654
Full Member
 

Micheal Jackson
The Beatles
Queen
Jazz (yes, the whole genre...utter shite)


 
Posted : 28/12/2009 1:00 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

As far as the Beatles being "overrated" is concerned, despite never having been a fan of theirs, I find that they are [i]now[/i] being constantly [i]underrated.[/i] I reckon it's hard overemphasise just how profound the Beatles influence was - and not just on music. Even Monty Python ffs, was influenced by the Beatles.


 
Posted : 28/12/2009 1:01 am
Posts: 0
Full Member
 

without The Beatles there would be no popular music as we know it.
Most over-rated to me is U2, few good tunes but thats it


 
Posted : 28/12/2009 1:07 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

coldplay=pish


 
Posted : 28/12/2009 1:12 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Hmmmm,

I is narked. Jacko, madge, etc ain't bands! They're people(?)

Bands are never overrated. These are groups coming together to produce wondeful sounds.

As for PF - great gig in the sky is still a huge fave.

Darkness - never really met their time

Elbow - been around ages nit just the Seldom
seen kid

I like music me, but it has to come from a band. Play it yourself and you're not overrated


 
Posted : 28/12/2009 1:17 am
Posts: 2
Free Member
 

U2 for sure. Not because their music sucks because some of it is OK but because they're so far up their own arses that it makes my ring hurt.

"Invest, invest, invest in Ireland, the home of the brave! But not us, we'll stick all our money into offshore investements. We meant you, the poor people."

After that, Snow patrol, Black eyed peas, LIL Wayne (WTF!!???), Radiohead (give me a gun!).

I've just done a search and these are the most popular bands on facebook. This is also the list that proves that we should be nuked from space. Humans have zenithed. It is now time for the species to die and pass on.

1. Rihanna (1.52 million)
2. Coldplay (1.49 million)
3. Lil Wayne (1.34 million)
4. Linkin Park (1.33 million)
5. Chris Brown (1.3 million)
6. Metallica (1.22 million)
7. Pink Floyd (1.16 million)
8. Bob Marley (1.13 million)
9. Red Hot Chili Peppers (1.12 million)
10. Justin Timberlake (1.05 million)
11. AC/DC (997,000)
12. Daft Punk (912,000)
13. Beyonce (906,000)
14. Queen (900,000)
15. Evanescence (873,000)
16. Jonas Brothers (843,000)
17. Radiohead (793,000)
18. Kanye West (792,000)
19. Katy Perry (791,000)
20. Akon (753,000)

Justin Timberlake is more popular than AC/DC. Which means more people think his music is better that AC/DC's. So clearly, we all need to die.


 
Posted : 28/12/2009 1:28 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Your forgetting the 'Sex Pistols'. Reminds me of that kit kat advert. 'You can't Sing, you can't play, you look awful, you'll go a long way'

Shame they did 'go a long way' as now we have to still put up with that c0ck John Lydon.

Any one that actually likes them still or thinks that they were actually influencial probably does not know very much about the era.


 
Posted : 28/12/2009 1:29 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Black Eyed Peas is a good shout as well actually - bizarrely popular.


 
Posted : 28/12/2009 1:30 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

without The Beatles there would be no popular music as we know it.

Without the Beatles, some other band would have come along and "changed popular music as we know it"...


 
Posted : 28/12/2009 1:34 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Oasis. Has been no bigger overrated band ever. They've done some good chunes (I'd count 3 or 4), but overall, they are no better than a cover band.


 
Posted : 28/12/2009 2:02 am
Posts: 66093
Full Member
 

The Rolling Stones. 1 good song.


 
Posted : 28/12/2009 4:24 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

+1 for Black Eyed Peas.

Listening to them, especially the long-haired ape-faced bellend that 'raps'* is like w&nking in a cactus-filled sock.

* He raps out of key too! How the hell can someone rap out of key???!!


 
Posted : 28/12/2009 6:27 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

The Corrs - no better than the Nolans. Just glad we no longer hear from them


 
Posted : 28/12/2009 6:40 am
Posts: 4720
Full Member
 

(Old git mode on)
Everything from the last 20 years.
(Old git mod off)


 
Posted : 28/12/2009 7:13 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

all the kanye west,rianna,dizze rascal type black gansta shite....nobody normally says this as the politically correct police will jump on you and call you a raceist.....
err...well no i just have ears and taste,its got nothing to do with what skin colour i see.god its crap all these airbrushed women making out there the sexiest things on earth and all the gold chain covered stupidly oversized clotes type blokes making out there some sort of sex gods.have a cold shower and get off my radio so i can hear some music from people who can actally sing.
(and as for tim westwood, the king peddeller of this tat, go back home to lowerstoft, you fool)


 
Posted : 28/12/2009 9:33 am
Posts: 7626
Full Member
 

without The Beatles there would be no popular music as we know it.

Without the Beatles, some other band would have come along and "changed popular music as we know it"...

thats exactly what i was going to write 🙂


 
Posted : 28/12/2009 9:33 am
Posts: 4986
Full Member
 

Oasis , definately not maybe..


 
Posted : 28/12/2009 9:39 am
Posts: 621
Free Member
 

Red Hot Chilli Peppers
U2


 
Posted : 28/12/2009 9:40 am
Posts: 9238
Free Member
 

odannyboy - I'd go with you on a lot of the old standard hiphop but if you paid more than a passing "He's black, he does urban music" bit of attention to Dizzee Rascal, he's nothing like that.

U2, Black Eyed Peas, Coldplay, most of the chart dance music, most R&B (really formulaic these days)


 
Posted : 28/12/2009 9:57 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

all the kanye west,rianna,dizze rascal type black gansta shite....nobody normally says this as the politically correct police will jump on you and call you a raceist.....
err...well no i just have ears and taste,its got nothing to do with what skin colour i see.god its crap all these airbrushed women making out there the sexiest things on earth and all the gold chain covered stupidly oversized clotes type blokes making out there some sort of sex gods.have a cold shower and get off my radio so i can hear some music from people who can actally sing.
(and as for tim westwood, the king peddeller of this tat, go back home to lowerstoft, you fool)

You're basically using the classic 'I'm not racist but....' - interesting that you don't just way that you're not keen on hip-hop/urban music

There's lots of good intelligent well-made hip-hop/urban music out there - dismissing it all as black gangsta shite probably is kind of racist imo.


 
Posted : 28/12/2009 10:41 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Can't believe it got this far without a visit from the arctic monkeys - all hype and no talent.


 
Posted : 28/12/2009 10:50 am
Posts: 9
Free Member
 

Oasis - utter shite


 
Posted : 28/12/2009 10:52 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Oh well, here's me 2p...

Oasis are my favourite band. Of all time. Ever. They deserve to be held up as producers of astonishingly good music. I still don't know why so many people go "oh yeah, their first two albums were alright, but then they got shite": seems to me people ain't listening to 'em and only because they're too proud to.

Ho hum.

Overrated band: REM. Their music makes me weep. (With pain and desire to have the CD rammed up George W. Bush's a-hole, before shooting the whole shebang into a volcano on Venus.)


 
Posted : 28/12/2009 11:00 am
 nuke
Posts: 5795
Full Member
 

Nirvana


 
Posted : 28/12/2009 11:04 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Coldplay are shite and the Beatles and Morrisey is a fake 😉 and while we're at the Quo make me want to head butt a sword.


 
Posted : 28/12/2009 11:07 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

My choice.......

U2...Yawwwwwwwwn.Bono please realise nobody cares a toss about you or thinks your the messiah.FFS.

Oasis.....good first album, up their own arse for the rest of their career.Both bros need a hard dig in the gob!!!

Beatles....Yawwwwwwn, how many times must i hear about how great they were etc etc. (and also went up their own arse as well).

Bruce Springsteen....tedious shouty **** with a large following of loyal fans for some reason.


 
Posted : 28/12/2009 11:08 am
Posts: 1
Free Member
 

U2 because there music is simply DULL


 
Posted : 28/12/2009 11:09 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Radiohead: will Thomme Yorwke ever stop ****ing moaning? - god what a miserable loser that man is, cheer up, life's alright, ffs.

same for Morissey, i don't care about your pain.


 
Posted : 28/12/2009 11:23 am
Posts: 33
Free Member
 

+ another one for U2.

Stop wearing sunglasses indoors you ***t.


 
Posted : 28/12/2009 11:25 am
Posts: 33902
Full Member
 

without The Beatles there would be no popular music as we know it.
Without the Beatles, some other band would have come along and "changed popular music as we know it"...
But they didn't, did they. That's just using the same dumb argument people use when shown works by, say Mondrian or Jackson Pollock: “Jeeze, I could do that!" Maybe, but the fact is [i]they[/i] had the imagination and creativity and got there first, and that's all that's important. And, frankly, none of your opinions counts for squat 'cos millions of people out there actually [i]buy[/i] the albums and go to the gigs so that's what makes those artists highly rated. Bitch about them all you want, you ain't gonna change anything.
In my opinion, Oasis were overrated just because they were pretty much a Beatles cover band with a change of lyrics; they had nothing that was original. I could possibly have lived with that if the brothers hadn't been such mouthy gobshites.


 
Posted : 28/12/2009 12:59 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

In my opinion, Oasis were overrated just because they were pretty much a Beatles cover band with a change of lyrics; they had nothing that was original. I could possibly have lived with that if the brothers hadn't been such mouthy gobshites.

Nail and head.


 
Posted : 28/12/2009 3:20 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

the beatles.......I just dont get it never have and most likely never will oh and anyone who falls within the modern usage of the term RnB....justin timberlake a great RnB artist of our time?...MY ARSE!!!


 
Posted : 28/12/2009 3:36 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Pink Floyd are not over rated in the slightest, especially when compared to over prog (some good King Crimson, much bad ELP)they were ahead of there time.

Problem is PF went on for a long time with very different musical leads, their Psychedelic era (syd Barret) is not to everyones liking, including mine, and their Rodger Water era (Such as Final Cut) was also only good if you like Rodger Waters as a solo artist, I don't. But when you take the good it is very very good. Albums like Dark Side of the Moon and Wish You Where Here; also Meddles B side (echoes). In my opinion when Pink Floyd work as a band with both Gilmour and Waters contributing equally then the product is amazing.

Also never let it be said that The Wall is there finest work, this album is also heavily Rodger Waters Bias. Although I do like it, but no where near as much as Dark Side or Echoes.

Rank Over - I really do like The Pink Floyd Sound.


 
Posted : 28/12/2009 4:14 pm
Posts: 5153
Full Member
 

I'm glad someone else out there thinks the same as me when it comes to the Sex Pistols - just another boy band put together by a manager to cash in on a trend

I don't agree that Cream or the Arctic Monkeys are rubbish but I conceed that some people go too far in thinking that they are minor deities (anyone ever heard that song by Dan le Sac and Scroobius Pip? 'just a band' :] )

ok, here's some more over rated's

Blur, one or two good songs (i.e. one an album) but a lot of filler in the albums and all that fake cockernee bullsht
the Cure, boring
metallica, crap
Guns N Roses, the big singles that still get played on the radio are showing their age and the rest is all toss
Paul Weller's solo stuff after the first 2 albums (Paul Weller and Wildwood are decent enough the rest are all dire and get progressively worse)


 
Posted : 28/12/2009 6:39 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

anyone who wins the mercury music award.


 
Posted : 28/12/2009 6:41 pm
Posts: 17843
 

slimtubing - will respond to your comment later!


 
Posted : 28/12/2009 6:46 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

The Beatles, again.

A moderately good beat combo who unfortunately 'took the world by storm', a world unfortunately not sophisticated enough to recognise rubbish music played by monkeys.

Look at their later achievements; a millionaire lying in bed for peace? Mull of Kintyre? Thomas the Tank Engine?

... I'm eternally grateful that I was too young to be exposed to them, and then when I was old enough, my critical faculties were well developed enough to realise that they really, really weren't all that.


 
Posted : 28/12/2009 7:02 pm
Posts: 3384
Free Member
 

beatles - yawn.

U2 - get over yourselves

no one mentioned ABBA though?!

oh god, shoot me now. why don't they just piss off and dissapear into the ether of shite that they came from.

sickeningly shit.

AND YET... flipping tv bangs on and on about them with their abba tributes etc etc etc... AAAAAAAAAAAAAGH

oh, and any 'tribute' band. clearly shit cos otherwise they'd be able to make their own music.


 
Posted : 28/12/2009 7:19 pm
Posts: 17843
 

As for Van Morrison, yeah he can sing but name me 10 good songs by him not including Gloria, Brown eyed bleedin girl, moondance or here comes the night.

1. Have I told you lately that I love you?
2. Cyprus avenue.
3. Flamingoes fly.
4. I have finally come to realise.
5. Madame George.
6. Sweet thing.
7. Tupelo honey.
8. In the garden.
9. Wonderful remark.
10. Beautiful vision.

I have around 40 of Van the Man's albums. Let me know if you want some more suggestions!


 
Posted : 28/12/2009 7:26 pm
 nonk
Posts: 18
Free Member
 

bit pointless this tread in my view.its shite its not yes it is no its not yes it is no its not yes it is. 🙄
music is what ever you feel it is.


 
Posted : 28/12/2009 7:35 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Van wrote some lovely songs (He HATES 'Brown Eyed Girl')
Did Ye Get Healed?
Listen To The Lion.
So Quiet In Here.
etc....

Shame he's such a miserable two-hat though.....


 
Posted : 28/12/2009 7:35 pm
Posts: 95
Free Member
 

For me Queen, hate the processed backing lyrics and Brian May's guitar sound, AC/DC should've packed it in years ago. Zappa, boring drivel. Iron Maiden, total mince.


 
Posted : 28/12/2009 7:53 pm
Posts: 17843
 

Shame he's such a miserable two-hat though.....

Don't really see what that has to do with anything. Arguably it's his demeanour that has made him such a great songwriter, alongside his life's experiences.


 
Posted : 28/12/2009 8:06 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

JLS they are rubbish. I cant stand them


 
Posted : 28/12/2009 8:14 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

JLS they are rubbish. I cant stand them

Them's not even reached "rated" status yet so don't fret. 🙂

Dylan.
Springsteen.
"Prog" rock.
Coldplay.
Snowpatrol , how these ****s have headlined T in the Park (twice) is beyond me. ooh but they're Scottish...........aye, but they're shite.

Loads more but I'm now having a turn thinking about shite music. 😛


 
Posted : 28/12/2009 8:23 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

A few runners up namely Oasis, Beatles, Coldplay, Yes, Dire Straits and Police

But the outright winner must be, wait for it, the tediously repetitive band that is Genesis


 
Posted : 28/12/2009 9:57 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

[i] one mentioned ABBA though?!

oh god, shoot me now. why don't they just piss off and dissapear into the ether of shite that they came from.

sickeningly shit.

AND YET... flipping tv bangs on and on about them with their abba tributes etc etc etc... AAAAAAAAAAAAAGH[/i]

hear hear. hated them then, still hate them now. and as for that 'film' based on the musical based on their work - what a crock of sh&te. Absolutely the worst filme ever in the history of celluloid. At least Plan 9 From Outer Space had a plot

[i]oh, and any 'tribute' band. clearly shit cos otherwise they'd be able to make their own music.[/i]

yeah, covers are easier to learn than your own material, but a lot less rewarding, especially when people actually [i]like[/i] your own material. but if you don't have a recognised 'writer' in the band you're buggered


 
Posted : 28/12/2009 10:46 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

If we're allowed solo artists it has to be Bob Dylan.


 
Posted : 28/12/2009 10:52 pm
Posts: 9590
Full Member
 

I have never got Bob Dylan either.

The Corrs are scarily dreadful as are R.E.M.


 
Posted : 28/12/2009 11:14 pm
Posts: 5970
Free Member
 

There are no overrated bands, just differences in taste. If I like something you don't like, and I'm a HUGE Radiohead fan, for example, then I win 🙂 Because I derive enormous amounts of pleasure from their music and seeing them perform, and all you get is a bitter taste in the mouth....


 
Posted : 28/12/2009 11:17 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

ColdPlay.
U2
Oasis.

Oh, and any of that X-factor bildge.

All boil my head, and have me gunning for the remote if they come on.. 😐


 
Posted : 28/12/2009 11:32 pm
Posts: 9
Free Member
 

Whilst I appreciate that some people think Radiohead can be a bit dour, at least they are original. Oasis are stil playing exactly the same shite, just rehashed, as they were over 15 years ago, which I suppose appeals to your average beer swilling england shirted youth.


 
Posted : 28/12/2009 11:38 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Pink Floyd - Unmusical, dull, wallowing, pretentious 'sound'
......
C'mon, they weren't that good!

Oasis
Adam Ant

SB


 
Posted : 28/12/2009 11:42 pm
Posts: 34968
Full Member
 

I sort of feel sorry for you all. All that bile and angst, it must be hell.

There isn't a band on this thread that I don't appreciate at least [i]a[/i] song. Some of them aren't anywhere near a favourite band or anything, but some of the comments are comical really, jealous much?


 
Posted : 28/12/2009 11:47 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Purplefunkymonkey: snowpatrol are sh*te but they're Irish not Scottish.


 
Posted : 28/12/2009 11:56 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

[i]Oasis are stil playing exactly the same shite, just rehashed, as they were over 15 years ago,[/i]

actually, they're not. not any more 🙂

BTW I never really got Pink Floyd either. Or Genesis.

Status Quo were never really 'rated' either, so can't be 'overrated' 😉

[i]All that bile and angst, it must be hell.[/i] no, not really, That's reserved solely for ABBA


 
Posted : 29/12/2009 12:08 am
Posts: 2
Free Member
 

So we're all agreed that U2 are overrated and need to be shot (into space preferably)?

Splendid, I'll sort out a chap to do the deal, you'll all need to put something in the kitty.


 
Posted : 29/12/2009 12:31 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

can I just watch "Under A Blood Red Sky" again before you do that? ta


 
Posted : 29/12/2009 12:35 am
 mboy
Posts: 12648
Free Member
 

bananaworld - Member

Oh well, here's me 2p...

Oasis are my favourite band. Of all time. Ever. They deserve to be held up as producers of astonishingly good music. I still don't know why so many people go "oh yeah, their first two albums were alright, but then they got shite": seems to me people ain't listening to 'em and only because they're too proud to.

Definitely Maybe - Sheer Genius of a biblical scale. NO WAY could you accuse Oasis of being overhyped because this album although very successful, took a lot longer to reach any real success than it should have done. It was no overnight success story, and I remember just how sceptical people were of this band of misfits from Manchester until they listened to the Album. Underhyped even?

What's the Story Morning Glory - Another bloody good album (though not quite as good as its predecessor), found it much easier to succeed than the first album as the band now had a name already. Overhyped? Yes/No/Maybe, it certainly deserved the credits it got so I don't think it was.

Everything after What's the Story - TOTAL AND UTTER SHITE! Overhyped crap being churned out by a band that lost their edge pretty much the moment they became popular. Perhaps the booze and drugs they could now afford were the culprits?

By far and away the most overhyped, total and utter piece of shite band I have ever had the misfortune to listen to are of course... Coldplay. Has Chris Martin ever sung a note in tune in his life ever? How the hell did they get so popular? I have never heard anything remotely worthy of being signed by a record company by Coldplay (and sadly heard way too much by them over the years mainly thanks to Radio 1!), yet they release album after album and keep going on and on and on... Am I the only person that doesn't seem to quite get this?

I see U2 have come in for some criticism on this thread though... Fair to say that a couple of their albums haven't been worthy of the hype, but then look back at projects like the Joshua Tree, and Rattle and Hum, and you'd have to eat your words if you had labelled them overhyped! Bono may not be everyones cup of tea, and he undoubtedly has the ability to come across as a rather hostile charity worker trying to make the world guilty if they haven't pledged their life savings to an African Family all too often, but the band have created some all time great Albums over the years gone by.

Anything off any reality TV or Talent Show doesn't count here... Why? Cos I take it as a given that if they guy/girl/group has to rely on the unwitted massed watching car crash TV on a Saturday night peddled by the biggest Shark of them all, Mr. Simon Cowell, that they are totally overhyped crap not worthy of the airtime they get. Even Coldplay have had someone discover them (even if that guy was tone deaf), to have to "be discovered" by some bilge talent show, then get 5 minutes of fame singing a song that was written and recorded first by someone significantly more talented (even more ironic this year given that the song was stolen from a 16 year old American Girl!) is quite simply breathtakingly piss poor. If they were any good in the first place they'd have got off their arses, gone and spoken to a few record producers and tried to start something of their own long before Mr. Cowell should happen across their sorry tale...


 
Posted : 29/12/2009 5:14 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

samuri - Member
So we're all agreed that U2 are overrated and need to be shot (into space preferably)

if you did this we would get atacked by aliens and blow up the planet
and as for coldplay just go and Fu** right off
rnb is also the worst music posible


 
Posted : 29/12/2009 10:30 am
Posts: 45
Free Member
 

Just because you don't like it doesn't mean it's over-rated - you just don't get it...maybe.... I suppose those bands/artists considered to be in the top few of all time must be considered over-rated by many as not everyone can get them.

I saw RHCP before they were big here ('89) so I liked that they later had a few hits but now they're mainstream I suppose which is a shame.

I suppose some can't get past Dylan's voice but for those with less simple tastes there is a lot to admire - obviously really because it's all about his music with him.

As for anyone thinking Zappa is boring, well I assume you haven't listened to much of his stuff - the variety is wider than anyone elses by far so boring doesn't make sense; in terms of musical skill pretty much at the top and comparable to classical composers as well as rock artists.


 
Posted : 29/12/2009 10:34 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

As for anyone thinking Zappa is boring, well I assume you haven't listened to much of his stuff

Well, no, sadly, I have suffered his crap round at mates' houses. The dreary doowop/rock'n'roll/flower power/etc pastiches, the sixth form jazz/classical pretentions that all turn into the same boring fretboard ****ing. Zappa is the musical equivalent of a 'You Don't Have To Be Mad To Work Here...' sticker.

The Clash were a spent force after the first album.

I never quite saw the fuss over Nirvana; they were pretty middle of the road musically and lyrically so I guess a lot of it must have been image?

U2. Horrid.

At the moment Arctic Monkeys, Killers, Kaiser Chiefs.. jeez. Plodding generic McIndie. No ta.


 
Posted : 29/12/2009 11:52 am
Posts: 7130
Full Member
 

I saw RHCP before they were big here ('89) so I liked that they later had a few hits but now they're mainstream I suppose which is a shame.

I don't get this. I saw them in 89/90 - and my opinions haven't changed (shite then, shite now). Why is it a shame when a band becomes mainstream? You either like it or you don't.

...which sums up music really. You either like it or you don't. No worries.


 
Posted : 29/12/2009 11:56 am
Posts: 2
Full Member
 

Robbie Williams (does he count?).

And +1 for Bruce Springsteen ("tedious shouty").


 
Posted : 29/12/2009 12:16 pm
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

The Beatles.

Someone was saying how special they were etc, and, yes, the White Album is very good and very unique and was groundbreaking in the way is wasn't any one thing, but was what the four of them (well maybe except Ringo, but that a whole other story...) liked regardless of how it fit their 'image'. However, much of their other work was not special, but marketed well - they are unique in that they were one of the first - and certainly the first successfully - marketed 'boy bands'. As such, the lessons learnt from their success is still being seen within the music industry to this day. However, many of the records they produced, although popular at the time, are overrated in retrospect.


 
Posted : 29/12/2009 12:39 pm
Page 1 / 2