Yep, probably more so now they don’t seem to be out and about in the community.

So you’ve got some dangerous equipment that relies on fallible people to remember stuff to keep it safe?

If remembering the thing was important it would be automated. The fact that it isn’t says either it’s not important and you’re making a mountain out of a molehill, or the company is irresponsible.

Make them both sit through a display screen equipment e-learning course until one squeals. You’ll have your answer in less than 5 years mins.

Onzadog
You have two people and a minor “crime”. You know one is guilty and one is innocent but you don’t know which is which.

Is it better to punish both knowing that you are punishing an innocent? Or should you allow them both to go unpunished knowing you’re letting the guilty party go free?

This is easy, the moral dilemma in this instance is not admitting the crime in one, and collaboration to conceal in the other, both culpable in terms of seeking recourse for the crime.

Leniency offered to the one that tells the truth, to not punish specifically for the appropriate deviation is to encourage further collaboration and a culture of guilty only if caught, education can only begin after one or both parties admit guilt.