I am happy that justice has been done.
But how can the defending lawyer try to pervert the course of justice with made up statements
Lord Harley, representing Mr Wojcicki, told the court he was a “diligent driver” and said Mr James had swerved in front of the minibus and did not give the defendant the chance to brake.
“For him to come into the path of my client took less than a second. It was all over in a second,” he added.
shouldnt there be a contempt of court, i understand the defendant needs a defence, but when does that break the law when making up stuff?
or am I missing something with our crap legal system