eat_the_pudding
Member
leeroysilk
It would just change the nature of reality, the laws of physics, everything we’ve learned about the universe and ourselves over the last few hundred years.
All of that really doesn’t matter to you?
Takes all sorts I guess.
Depends, even people who paid attention in school can be very blinkered to new ideas.
Take the idea of freak waves, there was an article in a science publication (well, a magazine, not a research journal) not so long ago that showed how freak waves could occur when two swells meet at a specific angle.
The comments were then filled with vitriolic explanations about how it was all wrong and simply constructive interference and that they’d been taught this in school, weren’t these scientists paying attention?
Understanding physics/chemistry/maths/biology and understanding science are different things. I don’t think the school curriculum really gets that point across. We’re taught to hypothesise, design an experiment, collect results and draw conclusions. But not to go any further because you’ve got a class of 30 kids with the same conclusion, which isn’t how science works (its just chemistry/physics/biology).
It’s like the moment in a-level chemistry when you figure out that not only are electrons both wave and particle but also not orbiting in spheres, and that their orbits aren’t fixed even within the orbitals. Basically throwing GCSE physics and chemistry out of the window and starting again with a new model!
GCSE history is more scientific than double science. Youre taught to evaluate sources and present an argument. Science you’re just taught that everything in the book is a fact. It’s no wonder some people then treat it like others treat religion.