- Genesis Tour de Fer – why shouldn't I?
So I have a hankering for a (relatively) speedy bike, suitable for lots of miles and smiles. Something for the roads, but able to take plenty of cycle path, and the odd bits of smooth singletrack I might spot. I also like the idea of a bike that can easily do light weight bikepacking, and handle heavier weight tours too. I went to my LBS yesterday and they had a lovely Croix de Fer 10 in that gorgeous deep red. Up to that point was thinking of the Croix de Fer 20, but really can’t get on with the white frame. But got a brochure, and I’m thinking the Tour de Fer is most suitable – slightly tougher for touring, racks and mudguards, and -most importantly- a triple chainset. I am a pootler, not a racer, and I’ve only ever ridden MTBs and BMXs, so no super light and nimble road bikes to compare it against… As well as the above, will use it for 30 mile per day commute once or twice a week.
So what’s your thoughts?? Thanks!Posted 4 years ago
I’ve been building one up (very slowly!) with the aim of taking up cycle touring. It’s only had a spin round the corner to take a photo so far but in that short trip it rode very nicely 🙂
[url=https://flic.kr/p/sqCX9L]Just add racks & panniers for adventure[/url] by Simon Barnes, on Flickr
Not sure I’d want it for any kind of speedy riding as it’s on the hefty side but I have other bikes for that.Posted 4 years ago
Now I changed to flat bars for extra comfy and pootling ability
Soon to come, some Dura-Ace bar end shifters and Pauls Component mounts to convert them to thumbies….
Flat bars enabled me to put Deore trekking hydro discs on, which work a treat with the rotors that were on it.
I had a whole new set of wheels built by my brother PeterPoddy…
Exposure dynamo front hub, XT rear on XM319 rims, 36 rear 32 front.
Nice touches…. spoke holder…
Side stand mount…
Nice cable routing…
I put one of my custom covered saddles on and a X-Lite Metal Matrix post…Posted 4 years ago
I also put some lighter 35c tyres on, Vittoria Voyager Hyper ones, cheap at PX. 422 each which saved 370g per tyre on the standard Schwalbe Marathons.
By changing those tyres and the seatpost I saved 1.85 lbs.
No it isn’t light but thats not the point. It’s meant for loaded touring. I really like it, with the new tyres it feels a little zippier than before too. It’s really comfy and stable, but not ponderous. You have a more upright position than a CDF and you sit “in” the bike. I was riding down a potholed street after a long days riding and doing it one-handed without realising it (I was very tired).
Durable enough for the weekly commute – the standard drivetrain may be a little low geared for a fast commute but I love it. Although the drivetrain spec seems a little lowly it changes perfectly and I’m well impressed.Posted 4 years ago
A Fuji Tourer is £499?! Wow!
Aware it’s no lightweight – what kind of weights are we talking here? I’m looking to buy a bike that’s ready to go – the chainset especially as the last thing I want is to upgrade a brand new bike. I live at the bottom of an unavoidable steep hill, I don’t want to kill myself in the first five minutes of every ride!Posted 4 years ago
So, in an about-turn and a moment of doubt, I’m now swaying to the Croix de Fer 10. For reasons, including: it’s lighter; I have a spare rack; touring will probably only occur very infrequently. I want something nippier than my Kona Hahanna for long day rides, with drop bars, and with discs. Hmmmm…Posted 4 years ago
Just ridden home from work on mine, it’s lovely. I didn’t even curse the evil headwind very much!
Tour de Fer handlebars are too narrow. Why put 40’s on nowadays?
The handlebar widths are size specific. I think you’ll find most manufacturers use narrower bars on their smaller sized bikes.Posted 4 years ago
I see that the Tour weighs 33+lbs?! Definitely swithering towards the Croix with that in mind, but oh! those gears. I tried riding my Kona up the hills in the middle ring today and it was totally beasting. My commute is early mornings, perhaps no one will see if I push?!
But the Tour vs the Croix – will the Croix be terrible for touring? What’s the difference, other than it being a fair bit lighter? Touring unlikely to occur often – but bike will be used for a plethora of things. I don’t hook my feet on my panniers on either my Inbred, or my Hahanna… Cheers!Posted 4 years agoOllyMember
why shouldn’t I?
I have no interest in “road riding”, so i couldnt care less (ok, within reason) how much the bike weighs, as long as it rides well. TdF is fantastic VfM if you ask me. There are other options, from the Genesis range and elsewhere, but the theory behind a good solid pavement bike, that will take a beating, lug a load, and take chunky tyres for “off-road” riding is a good one.
Ive got a Surly Disk trucker, and use it daily pretty much. Shops, Pub trips, Commuting when i can be bothered.
Do it.Posted 4 years ago
So think I’m leaning back to the Tour de Fer! I realise it weighs just over 31lbs. And I’m assuming that weight includes 2.5lbs of racks and bottle cages. And then I could save nearly 2lbs from lighter tyres and seatpost (thanks to Robdob’s comment). Et voila, 26.5lbs! 😀Posted 4 years agoback2basicsMember
just to comparePosted 4 years ago
planet x uncle john tourer here , and with racks it comes in at 13kgs, thats with ultegra chainset, also has discs and drop bars and rear saddle bag with 2 tubes and various touring bits (section of tyre, full allen keys and chain braker etc etc) and just 2 cages, oh and a largish pump…iaincSubscriber
I have a CDF30. The big benefit of the TDF is that it comes with the racks, guards etc, plus a well sorted drivetrain for lugging it and kit around. I think it’s pretty good value given the components and as others have said, once you have some bags and kit on it, the weight becomes a non issue.Posted 4 years ago
I have just weighed the front rack I took off my TDF. 552g without bolts. Rear rack probably weighs a bit more as its bigger so I reckon 1200g for both racks. That’s 2.6lbs for the racks alone.
It’s easy to spec a bike in the shops without all the kit you need and make it look light!
The tyres that come on the bike are awesome touring tyres that will handle some light off road too and surprising to get standard on a £900 bike. The tyres and racks alone retail at £100 and are pretty much standard kit for a tourer.
I have a dynamo hub and permanently attached lights on mine so it’s never going to be light!!Posted 4 years ago
Good to hear MrK! I’m a bit late to the conversation but I was going to chip in that my commuter (with guards, rack, Alfine gears and dynamo lights) weighs somewhere around the 34lb/15kg mark and it’s fine, I do 24miles a day and love every minute. For a long time I considered changing the steel frame and fork and thereby dropping about 1.5kg, but the thing is that it feels right, which is a really hard thing to find sometimes, so I decided to keep it! 🙂Posted 4 years ago
Alas, got to a well-stock Genesis dealer for a chat, and seems there are no more Tour de Fers left, except perhaps on a shop floor somewhere
If you’re anywhere near Manchester and need a 56cm then Bikeshak have one in stock… http://www.bikeshak.com/bikes/cyclocross-touring/genesis-2015-tour-de-fer-bike-rosso-red-56cm/Posted 4 years agotonMember
earlier in this thread, someone mentioned the tourer being too heavy.Posted 4 years ago
a lightweight bike does not make a very good tourer. i toured on a thorn audax frame, which is a great bit of kit, and a lot lighter than say a surly lht. with a rear rack with 2 full panniers and a bar bag, it rode like it was made of jelly.
The topic ‘Genesis Tour de Fer – why shouldn't I?’ is closed to new replies.