Portrayal of dominant chauvinism as radical and marginalized?
Ok so how do you explain the overwhelmingly male demographic for his shows? It’s not like they are internet addicts or aren’t otherwise busy with their work/wives/families. It’s because The Left has forcibly displaced man’s natural dominance in both the home and the workplace. Why do you guess that there is no equivalent female Peterson? Weird uh? Well not really, it’s exactly because women/communists/unicornkins currently hold all of the cards and they forced white men into beta roles via technology and collective rape-guilt. So there is no requirement for a female Peterson even if a woman were smart enough to be one. What we have now is an illustration of an archetype. Eve first tempting Adam by removing her hijab, and then when he made a grab she effectively bound him forever by accusing him of harrasment and rape-thoughts even though it was her intention to gain the upper hand by tempting him.
So now it is that any time the male seems like he is about to get the upper-hand, all of these ’empowered’ women just cry ‘rape’. Of course, the sensible male would not wish to be tried in that kangaroo court and so have his life destroyed, so what does he do? The male goes back to the computershed. Back to the internet. Deep inside the internet to find succour and comfort in the arms of identity politics. I mean the fight against identity politics. Wait. Ok This is why (for instance) Alex Jones had the courage to reclaim his top-level dominance hierarchy among humans. He knows he’s powerless against the interdimensionals, but he sure as HELL takes no shit. Right? Which reminds me, if I have time later we could maybe discuss the interesting narrative of He-Man vs Castle Grayskull. I think that archetype is just amazing, man. When you really think aboot it. Though I really wi$h I didn’t haveta. I’m just afraid of what will happen if we let Them win. (Do I hear a distant dogwhistle or is that tinnitus)?