Engineering Drawing...
 

MegaSack DRAW - 6pm Christmas Eve - LIVE on our YouTube Channel

[Closed] Engineering Drawing Practise

12 Posts
9 Users
0 Reactions
781 Views
 wors
Posts: 3796
Full Member
Topic starter
 

Dimensioning - putting equal - equal on a dimension for 2 holes around a centre line say with the centre distances of the holes on too. Good Practise or not?


 
Posted : 26/01/2012 10:15 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Never seen "equal" on a drawing but not 100% what you're asking!


 
Posted : 26/01/2012 10:23 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Over dimensioning IMO. One or the other.


 
Posted : 26/01/2012 10:23 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Dimension them on a common PCD? Think it's up to you/company/client practise - as long as there is sufficient info on the drawing to re-draw it/manufacture it based only on what is on the drawing sheets then you've passed the first/major hurdle 😉


 
Posted : 26/01/2012 10:27 am
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

You got to think about the guy who has to build it. Have you provided all the info he needs? How you present that info isn't that important as long as its correct and easy to understand and is consistent


 
Posted : 26/01/2012 10:29 am
 flip
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Put the = sign on either side of the centre line along with the dimn. normal practice.


 
Posted : 26/01/2012 10:33 am
 wors
Posts: 3796
Full Member
Topic starter
 

There is enough info on the drawing, I always thought putting = = around a centre line was bad practise, but my current boss doesn't. Not that it matters.

I guess I have been influenced by the older guys who I used to work with who drew everything by hand.


 
Posted : 26/01/2012 10:35 am
 kevj
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

It in not necessarily bad practice and I have seen examples of this on many drawings. The only problem is if the reader is not able to quantify what '=' means from other dimensions.


 
Posted : 26/01/2012 10:37 am
 cp
Posts: 8945
Full Member
 

Dimension between the holes, with a equal each side is usually sufficient in our place.

EDIT - and for our subbies

eg/

[img] [/img]


 
Posted : 26/01/2012 11:03 am
 flip
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Yes but the OP said around a C/L there isn't one on that example.


 
Posted : 26/01/2012 11:05 am
 cp
Posts: 8945
Full Member
 

I know - I was showing what was sufficient for us & our subbies.

If they were absolutely position critical holes, eg. dowel holes, location holes or some such, I wouldn't be using = X =, everything would be off datum faces. For stuff like mounting holes, tapped holes etc... I'd say either as I've done above or with a CL, doesn't really matter.


 
Posted : 26/01/2012 11:08 am
 flip
Posts: 0
Free Member
 

Ah yes.

This is making me miss engineering 😐


 
Posted : 26/01/2012 11:12 am
Posts: 1153
Free Member
 

Me too.

Spend my time on illustrator instead of solidworks these days 🙁


 
Posted : 26/01/2012 11:24 am