On the other hand you get magazines/websites where the journos are gnarcore enduro-bunnies, but can’t write fur toffee.
There we go again with the thinly veiled insults towards more skilful riders. Most ‘average to decent riders’ can jump, well the ones I know can.
There are decent writers at STW. Not sure you’re best placed to judge good writing with such appalling spelling though…
WTF is ‘fur toffee’ sounds rank.
As I said on the thread on the story itself, the notion of a journalist’s having to be a pro level rider to justify being allowed to review a bike is laughable. Taking the line of thought that only someone who can push the bike to the absolute limits can comment on its handling inevitably leads to the conclusion that only Sam Hill or Loic Bruni are sufficiently qualified to do so, and then only while they’re winning.
Pinkbike has more in depth reviews, but they are somewhat flawed, in my view, by certain of their writers’ constant need to frame their reviews within their own rigid (and sometimes ill conceived) notion of what constitutes correct geometry.
PS: I’ll pre-empt any criticism of my use of the apostrophe on the word ‘journalist’ by suggesting that you investigate the use of the possessive with gerunds.
JP